The president is dragging the church into a culture war. We shouldn’t let him.

President Donald Trump holds a Bible as he visits outside St. John's Church across Lafayette Park from the White House Monday, June 1, 2020, in Washington. Part of the church was set on fire during protests on Sunday night. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

“And now I am going to pay my respects to a very, very special place.”

This is how the president dramatically concluded Monday evening’s speech about the continued protests and clashes with police underway in nearly every metropolitan area. Minutes beforehand, and 30 minutes before Washington, D.C.’s curfew went into effect, police fired rubber bullets and tear gas into a crowd of peaceful protesters to clear the path from the White House to St. John’s Episcopal Church, which during protests on Sunday evening had a small fire set in its basement.

Advertisement

The president held up a Bible with the same confidence that I have when I use a power tool—which is to say, very little.

After protesters, along with priests from Washington’s Episcopal Diocese who had been offering them water and hand sanitizer, were gassed and dispersed, the president walked across the street to the church, stood outside and faced the cameras.

The president held up a Bible with the same confidence that I have when I use a power tool—which is to say, very little. “Is that your Bible?” a reporter shouted to him. “It’s a Bible,” he muttered back, in a true you-have-to-see-it moment:

Then he left. He did not pray. He did not go inside. He had not even informed the rector of the church nor the governing bishop that he would be coming. Perhaps in the president and his advisors’ eyes, he didn’t need to. He had his picture taken holding the Bible in front of one of the country’s most famous churches, boarded up.

The message was not difficult to parse: You and your church are under attack. I will use your symbols, you can use my power. I am going to protect it and defeat the attackers with whatever force is necessary. We’re on the same side.

He did not pray. He did not go inside. He had not even informed the rector of the church nor the governing bishop that he would be coming.

As McKay Coppins summarized in The Atlantic: “Most white conservative Christians don’t want piety from this president; they want power. In Trump, they see a champion who will restore them to their rightful place at the center of American life, while using his terrible swift sword to punish their enemies.”

St. John’s and the rest of the Episcopal Church saw this for what it was. “We want St. John’s to be a space for grace, as a place where you can breathe,” the Rev. Robert W. Fisher, the church rector, told The Washington Post. “Being used as a prop, it really takes away from what we’re trying to do.”

It is clear that the president is trying to pull the church and the Gospel into a culture war that is tearing our country apart.

Today, perhaps in an effort to shore up the 60 percent of white Catholic voters who helped put him in the White House, the president visited the St. John Paul II National Shrine, also in Washington. (Someone may have counseled the president that we Catholics are more often wooed with shrines and saints than with Scripture.)

Coupled with last night’s stunt at St. John’s (to use only immediately recent examples), it is clear that the president is trying to pull the church and the Gospel into a culture war that is tearing our country apart.

It even feels disingenuous to say “culture” war when actual violence is ravaging our cities and the real military is being readied to intervene. In “normal” times, manipulating the church like this would be (and has been) crass; under current circumstances, it is dangerous and antithetical to the Gospel message of peace. The church should resist it at every turn.

The president has stepped far over the line of what the church should tolerate, just like he did in the much-discussed campaign phone call with Catholic leaders that was ostensibly about Catholic education.

Thankfully, Wilton Gregory, the first black archbishop of the nation’s capital, understood this. “I find it baffling and reprehensible that any Catholic facility would allow itself to be so egregiously misused and manipulated in a fashion that violates our religious principles,” Archbishop Gregory said in a statement released as the president was arriving at the shrine.

While the world continues to devolve into unordinary times, the church today re-enters the opposite liturgical season. Today’s Gospel reading in the lectionary, which is proclaimed at Catholic churches all over the world, concerns the relationship between the church and secular government:

Knowing their hypocrisy he said to them,
“Why are you testing me?

Bring me a denarius to look at.”
They brought one to him and he said to them,
“Whose image and inscription is this?”
They replied to him, “Caesar’s.”
So Jesus said to them,
“Repay to Caesar what belongs to Caesar
and to God what belongs to God.”

The president’s visit lasted from 11:20 to 11:40 a.m. Mass at the shrine started at noon.

It is not quite correct that the church should not “take sides” in conflicts. True, the church is not and should not be political in the sense that is beholden to an ideology or political party. But the church absolutely is called to take sides: the side of peace, of the marginalized, of the powerless crying out. These are what and who belong to God.

[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]

Advertisement

The latest from america

Robert MacDougall in “Boys State” (photo: A24) 
In a new award-winning documentary about Texas Boys State, democracy is fraught with conflict.
Ryan Di CorpoAugust 14, 2020
We use the words “mystery” and “miracle” not to say that science has been stumped but rather to express the expansive claim that an event makes upon us.
Terrance KleinAugust 14, 2020
It has been two years since the Pennsylvania Grand Jury Report was published, documenting in disturbing detail at least 1,000 cases of abuse by 300 predator priests spanning seven decades.
Colleen DulleAugust 14, 2020
The precedent for attacking an opponent on religious grounds is more apt than you might think.