Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Jeffrey MeyersJune 28, 2019
(iStock)

Dorian Lynskey attempts to explain “what Orwell’s book actually is, how it came to be written, and how it has shaped the world” in The Ministry of Truth: The Biography of George Orwell’s 1984. But his discussion of Orwell’s life is familiar from many biographies. The literary sources of his novel are also familiar from a number of critical studies, and Orwell’s reputation and influence are well known from John Rodden’s two books.

The Ministry of Truthby Dorian Lynskey

Doubleday, 368p $28.95

Orwell would have hated the protest of counterculture rock stars (Lynskey’s hobby horse), who crudely stole Orwell’s ideas about Big Brother in their revolt against paternal authority. Lynskey undermines the significance of Orwell’s “influence” on popular culture by admitting that “Nineteen Eighty-Four has become a vessel into which anyone could pour their own version of the future” and by quoting Paul Johnson’s observation that since everyone “hijacks the wretched man for every conceivable political purpose, the net result is almost exactly nil.”

Lynskey denies that Nineteen Eighty-Four was influenced by Orwell’s serious illness. But he contradicts himself by stating that Orwell’s health declined dramatically when he was writing the novel and that Winston Smith “embodies Orwell’s horror at his own physical decay.” Lynskey unconvincingly tries to rehabilitate Orwell’s wife, Sonia. But she had rejected Orwell when he was well, did not visit him at his farmhouse on the island of Jura or in his Scottish hospital, did not type his manuscript, married him on his deathbed, was drinking with friends the night he died and then became the rich widow of a famous writer.

Nineteen Eighty-Four is not a nightmare vision of the future but a concrete portrayal of the present and the past.

Lynskey does not realize that Nineteen Eighty-Four is not a nightmare vision of the future but a concrete portrayal of the present and the past and that its great originality comes more from a synthesis of familiar material than from any prophetic or imaginary speculations. Lynskey claims that Orwell “did not lose faith in the future” and that his novel is not “devoid of hope.” But O’Brien definitively asserts that in 1984 punishment, like Hell, is permanent: “a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.” Winston Smith says, “If there is hope, it lies in the proles,” but the proles are so ignorant and oppressed that they have no will to revolt and (Lynskey concedes) “have immense power but fail to use it.”

Despite its faults, this could be a useful introduction to Orwell’s novel. But readers who already know a lot about Orwell do not need it.

More: Books

The latest from america

As Sam Tanenhaus makes clear in 'Buckley: The Life and the Revolution That Changed America,' it is impossible to understand American politics and culture without grasping Buckley’s immense influence.
Tom DeignanJune 26, 2025
In "Sister, Sinner: The Miraculous Life and Mysterious Disappearance of Aimee Semple McPherson,' Claire Hoffman delivers with a fast-paced page turner on the life of Aimee Semple McPherson. This biography brings into print another review of the achievements and personal failures of this major
Michael E. EnghJune 26, 2025
Readers of Dave Barry’s latest, 'Class Clown: The Memoirs of a Professional Wiseass: How I Went 77 Years Without Growing Up,' will find enjoyable excerpts from many of his most notable columns, surrounded by additional memories, commentary and, occasionally, the perspective of hindsight.
Kerry WeberJune 26, 2025
In 'Requiem,' her fifth book, Virginia Konchan takes the sacred seriously. She’s jocular with her subjects, including God, yet in doing so she demonstrates sustained attention toward the divine. God is among her natural poetic vocabulary.
Nick Ripatrazone June 26, 2025