Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Sufjan Stevens performing at Pitchfork Music Festival, July 16, 2016. Photo by Nina Corcoran

Theology is at once about everything and nothing. In the search to speak rightly about the divine, one can touch on any subject under the sun. Generally, this ability can be a source of great joy. Yet speaking only for myself, there are few topics so disheartening, depressing and humbling as ecological theology. Disheartening because the scope of the ecological degradation caused by humans is truly overwhelming. Depressing because we, the species who create this destruction, are so often ignorant of even the most basic knowledge of the planet. Humbling because, as Elizabeth Johnson notes, the world and the cosmos are so wonderfully vast, complex and ancient.

The texture and variety of Stevens's new album creates liminal spaces between the sacred and the profane.

To borrow from Carl Sagan, our all-consuming concerns fall away when the speck of our planet is seen against the vastness of the cosmos and we realize that the fate of Earth rests upon us as a species working together. No one alone can fix it. From this vantage point, salvation, the eternal union of creation with the divine, seems incredibly far off.

These realities were at the center of this month’s annual convention of the Catholic Theological Society of America in Albuquerque, N.M., where I gathered with 340 other theologians to unpack the relationship between ecology and theology. David Hollenbach, S.J., the president of this year’s convention, suggested that President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States’ commitment to the Paris climate accord can be seen as objectively sinful because “it undermines the shared trust that keeps other nations committed to the accord, with potentially devastating consequences for the entire planet.” While so much more was said, this one quote from Father Hollenbach seems to offer a sum total of the relationship humanity has to the Earth. The Earth suffers because of our failure to recognize humanity’s collective responsibility for creation.

The same weekend, the independent record label 4AD released “Planetarium,” a collaboration between singer-songwriter Sufjan Stevens, composer Nico Muhly, The National guitarist Bryce Dessner and percussionist James McAlister. While the conceit of the 17 tracks is a meditation on the major celestial bodies of the solar system, the album is very much about humanity. The cosmos is treated not so much as a natural wonder as a source for myths that serve the drama of the human search for meaning. From the title of the album (Planetarium, a human-made structure) to the sweeping interplay of classical instrumentation and mechanized sound, the listener encounters the majesty of space through human filters. The texture and variety of the album’s soundscape creates liminal spaces between the sacred and the profane, the mundane and the cosmic, prompting us to consider how we finite creatures want to live in the face of the infinite.

As a theologian, whatever transcendent decentering the music accomplishes, I am most interested in Stevens’s poetic lyrics, which fans have long admired for their rich layering of Christian, Greek and Roman mythic imagery over the writer’s narrative storytelling and autobiography. In the final three-song sequence, the story of humanity is refracted through the light of our Anthropocene era. The instrumental “In the Beginning” leads into “Earth,” the penultimate, 15-minute track at the heart of album’s narrative arc. For all the meaning we cast onto the heavens, for all our “hallelujahs,” Earth is where “living things refuse to offer/ Explanations of their worth/ We in turn avenge the Author/ With paranoia and prediction/ Exploration, competition/ Ceremony, inner anguish/ Lord, I pray for us.” Humankind launches head first into labor and industry only to see too late the beauty of the Earth.

In the end, with “Mercury,” the final track, people are as quicksilver as the Roman god. There is no set answer, no known future for the many crises of our own design. But we are reminded that each person is a “Carrier, friend” of our divine and earthly histories, so “Where do you run?”

Like any effective work of art, “Planetarium” recasts the work we have before us, especially in these difficult times confronting the Earth. Maybe it would be better if more of us saw the project of theology itself as a planetarium in the cosmology of salvation. Then we might stand a greater chance of remembering, for the sake of creation, not to make too much of ourselves in the face of the infinite.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
JR Cosgrove
6 years 5 months ago

To borrow from Carl Sagan, our all-consuming concerns fall away when the speck of our planet is seen against the vastness of the cosmos

Yet this spec is probably unique in all the universe. Either that or it was designed and there may be millions of other similarly designed planets. It could not have happened naturally. Too many coincidences.

David Hollenbach, S.J., the president of this year’s convention, suggested that President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States’ commitment to the Paris climate accord can be seen as objectively sinful

An incredibly arrogant statement to say what is sinful for someone else. I and tens of millions of others happen to agree with Trump on this as the whole Paris Climate accord is a sham. So are all these millions of other people objectively sinful as well? If identifying something as a sham and acting on it is sinful, we are in really bad shape, Maybe it would have been sinful not to act on it.

JR Cosgrove
6 years 5 months ago

An ironic outcome from modern technology is that solar costs are getting extremely low and may be feasible for large scale usage in the next 10 years.

The perfect place to build the largest solar installation in the world is on the 2000 mile US/Mexico boarder. It could be done for a couple billion dollars. The Mexicans would pay for it and use their labor and be situated inside of their border so they would own it.

They would sell the electricity to the US and Trump would have his wall and the Mexicans would enthusiastically pay for it.

john hernandez
6 years 5 months ago

Strange Why the attacks on President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate change agreement ignore the fact that American workers would suffer unfairly and that he has stated that America will lead by EXAMPLE vs. going along with an agreement favoring China and India at the expense of America. He has not disavowed working towards alternative fuel sources but is seeking a balanced approach, environmental and economic.

Douglas Fang
6 years 5 months ago

It seems that for hardcore Trump’s supporters, nothing that Trump had done really mattered. They would not blame him even if he just randomly killed some people as he said it himself very clearly in an infamous interview:


I never see such an astounding case of cognitive dissonance on full display as this is in modern society. This would be a case study for psychology, sociology, and theology for years to come in the future.

The latest from america

A Reflection for Saturday of the First Week of Advent, by Joe Hoover, S.J.
Joe Hoover, S.J.December 08, 2023
A Reflection for the Second Sunday of Advent, by James T. Keane
James T. KeaneDecember 08, 2023
My mom and I decided to start a new Christmas tradition—reading a chapter of the Christmas classic by our fireplace every night leading up to Christmas Day.
Michael O'BrienDecember 08, 2023
After a canceled trip to Dubai due to a bronchial infection, Pope Francis went into the center of Rome to continue the tradition of praying before the elevated statue of Mary next to the Spanish Steps.