Is cultural renewal possible without a culture war?

Teaching seminars on how law intersects with religious values, I have noticed how my students tend toward “fight or flight.” On the one hand, a “lawyer as gladiator” rhetorical model fosters tendencies to caricature an author’s argument so that they can more easily take it down. On the other hand, anxiety about the ultimate social sin—to judge another person’s identity or choices—leads them to merely summarize others’ arguments, thus avoiding putting their own positions and beliefs on the line.

Out of the Ashesby Anthony Esolen

Regnery Publishing. 256p $18

Both extremes distract them from the work of fully understanding the “other side” so as to face the more complex questions at the heart of a conflict or a problem to be solved. What is the antidote? The “sweet spot” is often found by learning how to ask thoughtful questions.

Out of the Ashes, by Dr. Anthony Esolen, is full of “fight.” The publisher’s press release describes the book as a “Battle Plan for Winning the Culture War.” The primary audience seems to be true believers on the traditional and conservative side of the political spectrum. This full-throated battle cry leaves no room for soft apologies or compromise with the enemy. Catastrophic hyberbole is a favorite rhetorical technique, as evident in the take-down of all current approaches to education: “There are only two things wrong with our schools: everything that our children don’t learn there, and everything they do.”

If the book’s intended goal is to be simply a “battle plan,” it could be described as a success. In particular, it is a helpful map to appreciate the connections between the various critical components of this brand of a conservative worldview: family, gender, work schedules; education, leisure and civil society; and convictions about the ideal size and role of government. The analysis is also sprinkled with beautiful passages and images from the classics and other literature that provide much food for thought, even when one does not agree with aspects of the interpretive frame.

But those who are looking for a serious effort to understand, meet or engage center-left or even center-right perspectives will be disappointed. And so the book will probably largely miss the opportunity to engage those who may share Dr. Esolen’s questions about the excesses of progressive ideology, oppressive work schedules and corrosive interactions with technology, even if they disagree with certain aspects of his vision for social change.

According to Dr. Esolen, for example, the breakdown of patriarchy and distinct men-only spaces is a lamentable root cause of the decline of social trust and the disintegration of the family. He argues that “enforced and unnatural equalizing of people is deeply unjust.” “Women sew, but men invent the sewing machine. Or they would—if we encouraged them to be themselves and gave them the space for it, without the distractions of the opposite sex nearby.”

A particularly troubling part of the book is Dr. Esolen’s argument that the encroachment of women into work and public life is to be blamed for a host of evils, including blocking productive civil public discourse. In Congress, the “creative enmity” of days gone by has disappeared because “in the presence of woman [sic], men become more intransigent, not less.” Instead, womanly sympathy “is essentially personal and intimate. It flourishes best at the hearth, the bedside, the table. It is passionate self-giving that makes the home.”

"Out of the Ashes" promises a plan for cultural renewal, but seems to skip the most difficult steps.

The book promises a plan for cultural renewal but seems to skip the most difficult steps—for example, how to address the systemic poverty, often exacerbated by racism, that leads many people to impossibly difficult economic and parenting choices and inhumane work schedules.

In this respect, Dr. Esolen’s scathing critique of the left might also apply to his own blind spots: “The progressive cannot diagnose his own disease. But that does not mean that he rejects the way of the Cross entirely. He makes everyone else walk it.

Why would anyone who does not align with this “side” of the culture wars be interested in reading this battle plan? Because it could be helpful to spend some time listening to extended arguments—and even passionate ones—outside of one’s own “echo chamber.” Notwithstanding the serious flaws discussed above, it is, for the most part, a well-written, if unfiltered, sustained argument.


My suggestion is to start with the last chapter, “Pilgrims, Returning Home.” In many ways it tracks current discussions of the “small is beautiful” options for cultural renewal, and it gives a mostly positive glimpse of what is at stake for Dr. Esolen, what are his deepest hopes and concerns. By holding that frame steady, I was able to move away from my own combative reactions to other aspects of the book in order to engage his argument with a set of thoughtful questions.

Ashes are not only a mark of prayer, conversion and penance. They can also nourish the soil for plants and living things—not only in the places that we might expect, not only in the ways that we might predict.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
1 year 11 months ago

I doubt I would take time to read Dr. Esolen's book, but some of his views are interesting. The productive way to deal with social change and masculine/feminine differences is to create dialogue, not try to turn back the clock. The Church should be able to lead they way in developing dialogue because it has the tools to do so. The problem for the Church is that it fails to see and understand the tools it has, so it takes the "every tool is a hammer" approach. It also wants to beat women back into a past role and uses the instruments it has as hammers, which ruins the instruments and does little but annoy women.


The latest from america

Colm Tóibín may have you reaching for your abandoned copy of "The Importance of Being Earnest" or "Dubliners," even if you have not touched those books since high school.
Emma Winters March 22, 2019

“No sooner had Jesus knocked over the dragon of superstition,” wrote George Bernard Shaw in ”Androcles and the Lion,” “than Paul boldly set it on its legs again in the name of Jesus.” Shaw’s line captures the outsize and frankly uneasy influence that St. Paul had on the early church.

Daniel LuzerMarch 22, 2019
Are conspiracy theorists just trying to maintain their empires and hawk merchandise? Am I a conspiracy theorist about conspiracy theorists?
Brandon SanchezMarch 19, 2019
Bing Crosby and Ingrid Bergman in ‘The Bells of St. Mary‘s’ (photo: Alamy)
Crosby was the most Catholic superstar the United States has ever seen.
John AndersonMarch 08, 2019