Quebec law bans some government employees from wearing religious garb

A new law in Quebec prohibits wearing religious symbols or vestments for some government employees, including public school teachers, state lawyers, judges and police officers. (CNS photo/Philippe Vaillancourt, Presence)

QUEBEC CITY (CNS) -- A new law in Quebec prohibits the wearing of religious symbols or clothing by some government employees, including public school teachers, state lawyers, judges and police officers.

The National Council of Canadian Muslims announced June 17 it will legally challenge the new bill.


"Late last night the Quebec government legalized discrimination on the basis of religion," wrote the organization. It called the last-minute amendments about the surveillance provisions of workplaces "deeply troubling."

[Don’t miss the latest news from the church and the world. Sign up for our daily newsletter.]

Quebec's majority government passed the bill, 75-35, using closure June 16 after long hours of deliberation. Some last-minute amendments concerning surveillance provisions made the law more stringent than anticipated.

Minister of Immigration, Diversity and Inclusion Simon Jolin-Barrette introduced Bill 21 March 28. It sparked controversy and heated debates; many feared it might alienate some citizens, especially Muslim women. Most religious groups -- including Christians and Muslims -- were not invited to participate in May's hearings at a National Assembly commission.

The government said it wishes to strengthen separation of the state and religions, religious neutrality of the state, equality of all citizens and freedom of conscience and religion. This was the fourth attempt by a Quebec government in the last decade to pass a law about secularism. Recent polls have all showed that Bill 21 benefits from a strong popular support.

Bill 21 includes a notwithstanding clause overriding some parts of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, mainly those about religious liberties, in order to shield it from too many legal challenges. The prohibition to wear religious symbols will only apply to new employees. Those who already had a job affected by this law will be able to wear religious symbols as long as they keep their current job.

[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]

Quebec Premier Francois Legault said after its adoption that Quebecers have been expecting such a law "for a long time" and that they clearly want to prohibit religious symbols for "people with (state) authority."

Opposition leader Pierre Arcand said this new "botched" law "removes" rights for people.

"Waking up with fewer rights for people that I love in a place that I love," said Lisa Grushcow, a Montreal rabbi. "It's worse than we had expected. There will be lots of legal challenges."

On June 14, the Quebec Assembly of Catholic Bishops said it feared Bill 21 "will nourish fear and intolerance, rather than contribute to social peace." On different occasions this spring, the bishops said they agree with the idea of promoting a secular state, but that it should not be at the expense of fundamental religious rights.

"We believe that it's better to fight prejudices and fear for the other in a rational way, by educating people about the diversity of religious, spiritual and cultural experiences and traditions, rather than by prohibitions," the bishops said.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
arthur mccaffrey
4 weeks ago

Pope Francis has spoken about "cultural colonialism" with regard to the effects of gender theory. Why can't we apply the same concept to immigrants who have no interest in assimilating and simply want to transport their religious and cultural practices wholesale into another country? It is not as if Quebec does not already have a rich culture of its own which would be in danger of being smothered by these newcomers. This new bill is an attempt to preserve Quebec culture and identity.


The latest from america

The role of caring for elderly family members is increasingly falling to mid-life adults. (iStock/kali9)
We can honor our parents by supporting a paid family leave program, one that is not limited to raising children but also recognizes the growing financial and physical burdens of caring for elderly family members.
Amy ZiettlowJuly 17, 2019
Fast food makes only one promise. That it is fast. Christ promises to feed us with food that will last.
Terrance KleinJuly 17, 2019
From left, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., respond to remarks by President Donald Trump after his call for the four Democratic congresswomen to go back to their "broken" countries, during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, July 15, 2019. All are American citizens and three of the four were born in the U.S.
The Editors: These comments need to be called out as racist, xenophobic and sexist.
The EditorsJuly 16, 2019
People wait to apply for asylum in the United States along the border on July 16 in Tijuana, Mexico. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)
“It is contrary to American and Christian values to attempt to prevent people from migrating here when they are fleeing to save their lives and to find safety for their families,” Cardinal DiNardo said.
Kevin ClarkeJuly 16, 2019