Catholic sisters send Senate a message: Don't touch Medicaid

A demonstration for affordable health care in New York City on July 13. Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Fla., chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, called on the Senate July 21 to fix problems with the Affordable Care Act in a more narrow way, rather than repeal it without an adequate replacement. (CNS photo/Andrew Gombert, EPA) A demonstration for affordable health care in New York City on July 13. Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Fla., chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, called on the Senate July 21 to fix problems with the Affordable Care Act in a more narrow way, rather than repeal it without an adequate replacement. (CNS photo/Andrew Gombert, EPA)

Thousands of Catholic sisters are pleading with senators not to tinker with Medicaid funding as Republican leaders attempt to make good on campaign promises to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

“As Catholic women religious, we have witnessed firsthand the moral crisis of lack of quality, affordable healthcare in this country,”reads a letter signed by more than 7,000 sisters. It was delivered to Senate offices on July 24.

Specifically, the sisters say that they are “most troubled by the cuts it would make to Medicaid by ending the Medicaid expansion and instituting a per capita cap [on spending].” The women religious said the G.O.P. plan “goes against our Catholic faith teaching,” describing it as “the most harmful legislation for American families in our lifetimes.”

Close to 75 million Americans, mostly low- and middle-income individuals, receive their health insurance through Medicaid, a federal program that was expanded when the Affordable Care Act was enacted in 2010.

The women religious said the G.O.P. plan “goes against our Catholic faith teaching.”

Sister Simone Campbell, the head of the lobbying organization Network, was part of a delegation to Capitol Hill that delivered the letters. She told America that the “benefit of having sisters do this is that sisters are often trusted messengers. We don’t have a partisan interest in this; it’s caring for the people.”

“Since many of our communities do health care, we know the struggle, we know the price that would be paid, and that is respected by people around the country,” she added.

The Affordable Care Act has been in limbo in recent weeks. A Senate plan to repeal key provisions of Obamacare appeared to have floundered after a number of both conservative and moderate Republican senators signaled that they would vote against the measure.

But after a White House meeting last week during which President Trump urged Republicans to make good on their promise to repeal Obamacare, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on July 24 that he would bring a health care-related bill to the Senate floor this week. He did not say which version of the plan the chamber would initially consider.

Mr. McConnell needs 50 of the 52 G.O.P. senators’ votes just to begin debate. More than the two Republicans he can afford to lose have said they are opposed to the Republican-backed legislation.

Sister Campbell said the letter was delivered to all 100 senators, with the message on Medicaid being: “Don’t mess with it.”

“It is another piece in a very large chorus of people saying this is bad for our country, this is bad for our state, this is bad for our people; don’t do it,” she said.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has also waded into the health care debate, releasing several statements over the past few months urging senators not to repeal the Affordable Care Act without ensuring that Americans would be able to keep health insurance. Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Fla., chairman of the bishops' Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, called on the Senate to fix problems with the A.C.A. in a more narrow way, rather than repeal it without an adequate replacement.

“Both the American Health Care Act legislation from the U.S. House of Representatives and the Better Care Reconciliation Act from the Senate were seriously flawed and would have harmed those most in need in unacceptable ways,"Bishop Dewane said last week.

In an analysis issued on July 20, the Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of “repeal and replace” would increase the current number of uninsured Americans by 22 million by 2026.

For her part, Sister Campbell riffed on a political interpretation of the Lord’s Prayer when describing her group’s efforts to persuade senators not to alter health care laws.

“We need to be engaged in the social issues of our time for the sake of the common good,” she said. “That’s where Jesus was; that’s where we’ll be.”

“That’s all we’re doing,” she said. “Give us this day our daily health care.”

Material from the Associated Press and the Catholic News Service was used in this report.

Vincent Gaglione
3 weeks 3 days ago

It is worth noting that the health care of a large number of women (and men) religious in this country depends on Medicaid and Medicare. That is because the paltry collections in the nation's dioceses to support the retired religious are not enough to pay for all their health care needs.

The fact that government aid is necessary to the survival of these religious also is an indictment of all those Catholics of a certain age and persuasion who rhetorically swoon about their wonderful Catholic school teachers who helped them into economically comfortable lives yet who refuse to contribute mightily to their benefactors' needs.

You can read into the following comment what you want: I won't comment vis-à-vis the religious on the comfort level of the lives of USA Bishops who don't take vows of poverty!

John Walton
3 weeks 1 day ago

Completely incorrect -- the Bishops decided that the nuns shouldn't pay social security taxes, as the parishes and dioceses would have to pay their commensurate portion, thus making them (the nuns) ineligible for medicare. Bad move Bishops, most of them long having met their Maker.

Frank Pray
3 weeks 2 days ago

The sisters' hearts are in the right place, but not necessarily their heads. Leadership must take the high view of all costs to the whole country over the long haul. We are over $18 trillion in debt, and social welfare programs are a major part of that black hole. Health care costs are paid primarily to extend the lives of persons over 80. But those costs mean less money to educate the young, or to provide capital funding for new businesses, or repair infrastructure. Every charitable impulse deprives as well as confers. Tough choices have to be made by leaders having the big picture and a commitment to the common good.

Chuck Kotlarz
3 weeks 2 days ago

Reagan’s tax cuts increased debt as a share of GDP from 31% to 61% and the Bush tax cuts increased debt from 54% to 99%. Federal spending as a share of GDP was the same in 2014, as it was in 1980. The top federal income tax rate was 70% in 1980.

John Walton
3 weeks 1 day ago

Reagan's tax cuts also provided the greatest increase in real per capita incomes for the bottom decile of wage earners since the Kennedy tax cuts. Sheesh, I wish you LIBS would look at the economic data!!! Tax cuts for the purportedly rich disproportionately benefit the lowest wage earners as paradoxical as that might seem.

Vincent Gaglione
3 weeks 2 days ago

What am I missing in making sense of the comments here.

Which is the moral issue?

Is giving good healthcare to the sick...no matter their economic condition... a moral issue?

Is resolving the national debt a more important moral issue?

The use and application of the surplus wealth in this nation, to my way of thinking, is the biggest moral issue, never mind what we spend on defense!

My political persuasion does not incline me to deny anyone good healthcare for any reason, including going into debt. That is just one of the opinions that I have formed as the result of the Catholic education that I received in my formative years.

Charles Erlinger
3 weeks 2 days ago

I can't see that you are missing much, if anything, with regard to the moral issue.

I continue to be astonished that so little congressional and administration effort is devoted to supporting applications, both technological and operational, that could increase efficiency, reduce cost, and encourage patient decision making involvement in the health care delivery system. Can anyone imagine what the costs and inefficiencies might be in the securities trading systems if we still had 60-70 year old technology, as well as operational and business practices in place?

Of course there are implementation challenges. They have been encountered and surmounted over and over again in numerous other industries.

Chuck Kotlarz
3 weeks ago

Vince, health care, as you note, should be a moral question alone. Some perhaps believe we must choose between health care and the national debt. Despite healthcare’s high cost, other factors, not health care, have led to a high national debt.

Thirty developed nations provide universal health care with 100% coverage, longer life expectancy and lower costs. Historically, good government has distributed available improved health outcomes and without government, the U.S. will continue to have the worst results and highest cost of thirty countries.

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

I’ve never even owned a dog. Isn’t that a prereq for parenting these days?
Ashley McKinlessAugust 18, 2017
Injured people react after a van crashed into pedestrians in the Las Ramblas district of Barcelona, Spain, Aug. 17. Terrorists killed at least 12 and injured more than 50 others. (CNS photo/David Armengou, EPA)
The pope denounced the attack as “a grave offence against the Creator.”
Gerard O'ConnellAugust 18, 2017
Last week, as events unfolded in Charlottesville, Va., my black Dominican father was pulled over by I.C.E.
Olga SeguraAugust 18, 2017
On Aug. 21, there will be a total solar eclipse and its path will fall across the entire continental United States.
Margot PattersonAugust 17, 2017