Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Nell Andrzejewski holds up an image of Our Lady of Guadalupe as thousands of participants gathered at Chicago's March for Life rally on Jan. 15. (CNS photo/Karen Callaway, Chicago Catholic)

A few days before the annual March for Life, a new national poll indicated shifting public attitudes, crossing party labels, in favor of increased restrictions on abortion.

"When you ask Americans what they think of abortion ... you get very, very strong numbers in favor of restrictions," said Andrew T. Walther, vice president of communications of the Knights of Columbus, during a Jan. 23 news conference livestreamed to reporters.

The Marist survey of 2,729 adults was conducted in December and sponsored by the Knights of Columbus. It contains breakdowns by political affiliations and ethnicity but not religious beliefs, so there was no information on how many respondents were Catholics.

Fifty-two percent of the respondents indicated that they thought of themselves as "pro-choice," while 42 percent self-identified as pro-life. But when the questions became more detailed on abortion policies, the numbers shifted.

Across political and ethnic lines, overwhelming majorities of respondents indicated they would like "significant restrictions." That included 91 percent of those who called themselves supporters of President Donald J. Trump, and 55 percent of those who identified themselves as Hillary Clinton supporters. The poll further showed that 79 percent of both African-American and Latino respondents favored significant restrictions.

Further, 74 percent said they wanted the Supreme Court to rule on these restrictions, indicating support for overturning the court's 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, which legalized abortion virtually on demand.

Eighty-three percent said abortion should be allowed only to save the life of the mother, while 77 percent said it should not be permitted under any circumstance.

In line with Trump's new executive order reinstating what's called the Mexico City Policy, which bans tax dollars from funding groups that promote or perform abortion overseas, 83 percent opposed that use of tax money in other countries, and 62 percent opposed the use of tax money generally.

Fully half the respondents thought abortion "has a negative, long-term impact on a woman's life," while 19 percent were unsure.

Fifty-nine percent believe that abortion limits were either "important" or an "immediate priority, and the same percentage agreed when asked if they thought abortion was "morally wrong."

The same level of support was expressed for an abortion ban after 20 weeks of pregnancy, and 60 percent believed that medical professionals with moral objections should not be legally required to provide abortion services.

The 44th annual March for Life, which draws thousands to Washington to commemorate the anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe decision, will be held on Jan. 27. 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

The author, his father and his infant son outdoors in front of a tree.
Our shared name is a constant reminder that the work I do today is not on behalf of some shapeless ideal of a better world, but for the world that my children will grow up in.
John DoughertyMay 19, 2022
A black-and-white photo of Msgr. Nelson Baker wearing a biretta.
When it comes to abortion debates, we need fewer polemics and much more compassion, especially of the kind Venerable Nelson Baker put into action.
Matt Malone, S.J.May 19, 2022
Loyola Montreal will begin accepting female students in 2023 (photo courtesy of Loyola Montreal)
“To open the doors to a Jesuit Catholic school for as many students as we can in the Montreal area is really important to us.”
Sarah VincentMay 19, 2022
Catholic health care ministries are at odds with the American Civil Liberties Union on many issues. But are there areas where the two can agree—or collaborate?