'White Trash' blends literature, politics and pop culture of the past 4 centuries to tell the story of class in America.

White Trashby Nancy Isenberg

Viking. 446p $28.00

Reporting on the Donald Trump phenomena back in May, John Harris wrote in the British newspaper The Guardian that while Trump was indeed frightening, his liberal critics relied on “caricatures of rednecks and white trash.” Meanwhile, writing for the conservative National Review, Kevin B. Williamson railed that the “white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Donald Trump’s speeches make them feel good. So does OxyContin.”

Never mind that numerous analyses have found that Trump’s appeal actually cuts across socioeconomic (if not racial) lines. Either way, if Trump’s candidacy is a problem, pundits on the right and left have thought of it specifically as a “white trash” problem.

Trump’s presidential run is not mentioned in Nancy Isenberg’s comprehensive and fascinating new study. But she does show that for several centuries now, the white underclass has perplexed elites and other observers.

What Isenberg refers to as white trash—not to mention rednecks and crackers, along with more antiquated terms like clay-eaters—have proven to be easily manipulated, yet also transgressive. They have, at times, reinforced the dominant power structure but at other times challenged it. The political ramifications have been (as Trump might say) “huge.”

Isenberg’s aim is to explore the “pervasiveness of a class hierarchy in the United States.”

Contrary to popular myth, Isenberg—a Louisiana State University history professor and the author of Fallen Founder: The Life of Aaron Burr and Sex and Citizenship in Antebellum America—contends that England’s colonial cheerleaders “imagined America not as an Eden of opportunity but as a giant rubbish heap that could be transformed into productive terrain.”

Isenberg wisely structures her early chapters around lesser-known yet illuminating figures like Richard Hakluyt (1530-91), who, along with his son of the same name, were “England’s two chief promoters of American exploration.” Other insightful sources include the travel writer William Byrd II (Virginia, 1720s) and the early “ornithologist and poet” Alexander Wilson (early 1800s).

Particularly revealing is Isenberg’s analysis of the famed radical Thomas Paine, who wanted Americans to “break with the Crown” yet also “not to disturb the class order.” Hence, according to Isenberg, “vast numbers of convict laborers, servants, apprentices, working poor and families living in miserable wilderness cabins are all absent from [Paine’s] prose.” Sadly (presumably because of a paucity of sources), we don’t hear much directly from these people in Isenberg’s book either.

Still, from John Locke and Ben Franklin to Andy Griffith and Sarah Palin, the breadth of Isenberg’s material is impressive. If Lin-Manuel Miranda (of the Broadway show “Hamilton”) can find hip-hop in America’s early days, then why not Isenberg? She compares Davy Crockett and others to “certain masters of gangsta rap [who] had to make up for their lowly status by dressing themselves up in a boisterous verbal garb.”

One of Isenberg’s key figures is Andrew Jackson, whose “rough edges” made it easy to forget he was a “slaveholding planter whose reputation situated him not in the halls of power but among the common stock.”

In short, for better or worse, powerful political figures could forge a connection to the powerless. By 1840, Isenberg writes, the once-lowly “squatter” had “morphed into the colloquial common man of democratic lore.” But America’s race and class warfare came to bloody fruition when “Confederate ideology converted the Civil War into a class war.”

In the book’s second half, Isenberg ably guides the reader through the diverse class ramifications of the eugenics movement, the Great Depression, restrictive housing covenants and the presidencies of the Southerners Lyndon B. Johnson, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. The book starts to feel more like a freewheeling magazine piece, with riffs blending literature, politics and pop culture. Isenberg’s kitchen-sink analysis is impressive, though its coverage of so much territory invariably draws attention to what she has left out. (Why analyze “Deliverance” and “The Beverly Hillbillies” but not, say, rural depictions in “Twilight Zone” episodes, or the notorious torture scene in “Pulp Fiction,” which is oozing with Southern-fried sleaze? Or even Eminem’s rap, “White Trash Party”?)

On the political end, Isenberg could have used a more forthright analysis of why, since the 1960s, poor whites have moved so rapidly and loyally rightward, even though they “were the beneficiaries of rehabilitative efforts during the New Deal and in L.B.J.’s Great Society.”

There is another potential problem, albeit unintended, with Isenberg’s book. In recent years, there has been an explosion of online interest—often from white nationalist groups—in slavery as it was experienced by whites in America. Isenberg herself emphasizes the terrible conditions of such “coerced labor,” noting that as far back as the early 17th century, “leaders of Jamestown had borrowed directly from the Roman model of slavery.”

Bigots have selectively explored this history and asked: If these people could “get over” slavery, why can’t African-Americans? Isenberg, of course, is suggesting nothing of the sort. But in the eternal American conflict over race and class, emphasizing one often means failing to acknowledge the importance of the other.

Ultimately, though, Eisenberg’s is a necessary and important book. It is hard to refute her when she forcefully argues: “We must stop declaring...that Americans...escaped the burden of class that prevailed in the mother country of England.”

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
4 years 3 months ago
Donald Trump definitely appeals to the uneducated and the Republican Party has had a decades-long campaign of misinformation aimed at the uneducated. One example of this is talking about the national budget as though it is a household budget. My sense of the "white trash" issue is that "white trash" arises wherever there is a permanent underclass based on race. In that case, fair skin and eye color is associated with the "upper class" and people begin to put a lot of importance on race rather than on achievement. If all a person has to be is light-colored, they often don't bother to put effort into education or success in employment. This opinion is based only on my experience of growing up in a place without a racial underclass and moving to a place with a racial underclass when I was in high school.

The latest from america

Aaron J. Leonard’s new book draws from almost 10,000 pages of F.B.I. files on an array of folk artists. It aims to illustrate the considerable impact that the U.S. government’s campaign against Communism had on folk artists in the 1940s and early ’50s.
Joe PagettaJanuary 21, 2021
Eric Holthaus experiences climate change as a wound, a rending in the fabric of society and ecology.
Christiana ZennerJanuary 21, 2021
Emma Donoghue's new novel unfolds over the course of All Hallows’ Eve, All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ Day—with a chatty cast of priests, nuns and philosophizing orderlies running about—adding to the sanctified air.
Tom DeignanJanuary 21, 2021
This debut novel by 29-year-old Marieke Lucas Rijneveld won the 2020 International Booker Prize.
Diane ScharperJanuary 21, 2021