San Diego bishop calls Trump’s border wall “ineffective and grotesque”
President Donald Trump inspected eight border wall prototypes yesterday in southern California, saying that without “a wall system, you’re not going to have a country.”
“Drugs are pouring through California,” he said, adding that those who enter the United States illegally are “like professional climbers.” Nevertheless, he said, “When we put up a real wall, we’re going to stop 99 percent, maybe more.”
Trump: “When we put up a real wall, we’re going to stop 99 percent, maybe more.”
The head of the Diocese of San Diego, Bishop Robert McElroy, reacted to the president’s visit with a terse statement: “It is a sad day for our country when we trade the majestic, hope-filled symbolism of the Statue of Liberty for an ineffective and grotesque wall which both displays and inflames the ethnic and cultural divisions that have long been the underside of our national history. Our faith is in the God who is the Father of us all, and who urges us to see Jesus himself in the immigrants and refugees who seek safety and freedom.”
Kevin Appleby, senior director of international immigration policy for the Center for Migration Studies in New York, also criticized the proposed wall, saying that it “is a symbol, but it also has harmful consequences on border communities and the migrants themselves.”
As the United States has built barriers on the Mexico border, it has simply redirected the flow of unauthorized entries to more remote areas of the desert, Mr. Appleby said. While Mr. Trump says the wall can stop illegal immigration, according to the Center for Migration Studies, the larger problem comes from people who enter the country legally and overstay their visas. Overstays account for about two-thirds of new undocumented immigrants, a pattern that began in 2007.
Visa overstays account for about two-thirds of new undocumented immigrants, a pattern that began in 2007.
“Economic and other factors are influencing migration across the border,” Mr. Appleby said in an interview with America. An enforcement-only approach will not stop the problem of illegal immigration, he said. “We need comprehensive reform.”
The U.S. bishops have been urging a comprehensive overhaul of the immigration system for more than 15 years. In 2003, bishops from the United States and Mexico issued a joint pastoral letter, “Strangers No Longer,” in which they outlined a Catholic approach to reform.
The bishops have recognized a sovereign nation’s right to regulate its border, but they argue enforcement should be targeted, proportional and humane. Reform, they say, must go beyond border security, and it should offer undocumented immigrants a pathway to legal status, maintain family-based immigration and develop a market-driven temporary worker program.
“It’s shameful that we insist on building walls that separate rather than construct bridges that connect,” said Pat Murphy, a Scalabrini priest, in response to Mr. Trump’s California visit. Father Murphy runs a center for migrants in Tijuana, Mexico, just south of San Diego.
“I wonder what message we are giving to the people of the world and especially the migrants who are forced to leave their homes in search of a better life,” he said. “There must be a better way because no wall, no matter how high, will change the reality of so many people forced to migrate—or simply die.”
Investing in economic development in the countries sending migrants would do a lot more to stem illegal immigration, according to Mr. Appleby. Migrants, he said, would prefer to stay in their homes and support their families. As evidence, he noted that the number of undocumented immigrants from Mexico living in the United States dropped by 1 million between 2010 and 2016, thanks to Mexico’s improving economy. But the number of migrants from Central America, a region beset by violence, continues to escalate.
“The only sustainable solution to [illegal] migration is addressing the root causes of why people are compelled to leave their countries,” Mr. Appleby said. “The problem is that Washington doesn’t have the attention span to stick with the issue. It won’t be solved within an election cycle.”
[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]