At Citizens Assembly, Ireland’s abortion laws come back into focus

Few issues have mobilized and polarized the Irish public as much as abortion. By law, abortion is prohibited in the Republic of Ireland, with the exception of when the life of the mother is endangered, including the risk of suicide. But in recent years, the call to liberalize Ireland’s abortion laws has created significant political pressure, with left-leaning parties like Sinn Fein and Labour favoring a referendum on abortion, a notion resisted by the more conservative parties of Fine Gael and Fianna Fail.

During the election of 2016, the government committed to creating a citizen’s assembly to make recommendations on key issues of the Constitution, including climate change, fixed-term parliaments and abortion. In October, Taoiseach Enda Kenny, the prime minister of Ireland, opened the assembly in Dublin, with 99 randomly chosen citizens to represent the Irish electorate in terms of gender, age and location. Their first priority will be the issue of abortion.


At a hotel in Dublin over four weekends, the assembly will be examining what is widely referred to as the Eighth Amendment, which gives effect to Ireland’s ban on abortion. It declares that the Irish State “acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right.” It was voted into the Constitution by referendum in 1983 and passed on a significant margin, carried by 67 percent of the electorate (albeit on a turnout of 54 percent).

But the electorate of 2016 is a different generation entirely. One recent poll, carried out by the Irish Times/Ipsos MRBI in July, found that two-thirds of respondents were in favor of repealing the Eighth Amendment to allow for abortion in some cases, for example, cases of rape and fatal fetal abnormalities. The poll followed a United Nations ruling in June that Ireland’s abortion ban violated the human rights of women. The following month, several government ministers refused to follow the government’s instruction to vote against an abortion bill that would have allowed for abortion in the case of fatal abnormalities (under current laws parents must carry a pregnancy full-term). The Constitutional protection to the unborn’s right to life meant the bill was not legally viable, but the minister’s refusal was prompted by frustration at the government for not acting on calls for a referendum.

The citizen assembly’s recommendations, based on their views after discussion and submissions from various groups, will be forwarded to the Dáil (Parliament) and Seanad (Senate) for a further vote next year. The process has drawn criticism from the pro-choice campaign, who feel the assembly is little more than a delay tactic, while many in the pro-life campaign feel the process already has a pre-arranged outcome and a referendum is inevitable.

Two weeks before the first meeting of the assembly, the Catholic Primate of All Ireland, Archbishop Eamon Martin, described the Eighth Amendment as underpinning the fundamental principle that all human life is sacred. He also pointed to what he described as the contradiction between calls for the repeal of the Eighth Amendment and the increasing urgency as a society about caring for the planet and its creatures. "To deliberately and intentionally take the life of an innocent person, whatever their state or stage of life, is always gravely morally wrong," Archbishop Martin said, adding that the focus should be on services and support for women facing unplanned pregnancies.

At the first meeting of the assembly in October, Enda Kenny stressed the importance of allowing for all opinions to be heard, in an era where people with diverse opinions are often “pitied, ridiculed, virtually hounded or indeed destroyed.” Kenny was specifically referring to social media sites, which have provided fertile ground for derision on both sides and have put the participants of the assembly within reach. Addressing the group directly, Kenny said the issues to be discussed are beyond politics; they are hugely challenging, deeply complex and profoundly ethical. He said, “Your work in addressing and achieving this vital consensus on behalf of us all will affect—indeed profoundly affect—how we live our individual lives and our national life in the Republic of Ireland in the years to come.”

The first discussion on abortion begins on Nov. 25.

Rhona Tarrantis America's Dublin correspondent.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
1 year 12 months ago
This is one time when the Irish people in my opinion ought to heed the recommendation of the Irish Roman Catholic Bishops. Pray for all concerned, in Christ, the Life...


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018