David Walsh attempts to convey the incredible privilege of being a person

Politics of the Person as the Politics of Beingby David Walsh

Notre Dame Press. 312p $39.00

The central insight of David Walsh’s book is that “...the person is transcendence, not only as an aspiration, but also as his or her very reality. Nothing is higher. That is what this book strives to acknowledge.” Walsh, professor of politics at Catholic University of America, proposes that the change that overcame philosophy around the time Descartes declared his “I think therefore I am”—the shift from metaphysics, or the study of being as being, to epistemology, the study of knowledge or how we know—is, overall, a good thing that has veered off course by focusing on the autonomy of persons rather than their ultimate value.


Walsh admires the work of Kant, along with that of Martin Buber, Nietzsche and Heidegger, among many others. Which is what makes this book a surprise for one trained in scholastic philosophy. After all, hasn’t personalism been done before? Mounier, Marcel and Maritain, led the way after World War I. Yet, Walsh maintains, they never managed “to engage the intellectual mainstream” because they mistook “the wish for the fulfillment” and never dove into a “more sustained reflection on the philosophical transformation that was sought.”

Thus the idea of autonomy stole the show and led to philosophers like Peter Singer saying that persons, especially infants, are expendable. Echoing Buber, Walsh responds, “The other must always be a Thou if he or she is to escape being an It.” And so he endeavors to push personalism past mere advocacy into the realm of development and discovery.

He does this by describing his vision of personalism in chapters devoted to personalism itself, morality, reality and science, God, art, history and politics. In these chapters Walsh reiterates his definition of the person as something transcendental—“transparent” like God, but not God.

The two chapters that stood out for this reader were on morality and art. The chapter on morality is titled, in Nietzschean parlance, “Persons as Beyond Good and Evil.” Walsh admires “the great iconoclast” because “Nietzsche’s critique of conventional morality was at root a moral critique.” Also: “Nietzsche has an unfailing ear for the humbug that crept into the most well-meaning exhortations to goodness. And he never failed to expose it.” Nietzsche reminds us that life is “an unending struggle” and that truth should be “integral to moral discourse.” Persons, Walsh says, are beyond good and evil because they are always struggling to move toward one or the other, not because good and evil don’t exist.

Kant described “this dynamic as a mysterious unfathomability that has not been well served through its identification with the notion of autonomy,” for since we have labeled what it is to be human as autonomy, then “the vitality of the moral life is arrested.” In other words, “Autonomy overflows into a metaphysics of the person...autonomy is itself overturned in the direction of the personal horizon with which it unfolds.” Everything must be looked at remembering who is doing the looking.

The chapter on art is titled, “Art as the Radiance of Persons in Reality” and is itself a radiant exposition. Walsh begins by noting that the category of “art” did not really exist until modern times; previously, art was always in service of something else, usually “religion and power.” Because of the decline of religion, “art and science have been released from all oversight but their own.” This has led to advances in both, yet also “a decline in accessibility.” Walsh describes how art should be radiant with truth and ends the chapter with his own philosophical paean:

All of reality is therefore one gigantic metaphor of the person, the disclosure of what cannot be disclosed that can nevertheless be glimpsed with the eye of love. The astonishment before the cosmos is the same as the astonishment before the human heart, for they are continuous as the astonishment within which the person dwells. Art lives within that irruption. It attests to the life beyond life that is the source of life.
Politics of the Person as the Politics of Being is a dense and difficult read, but also very rewarding. In trying to describe the indescribable astonishment that each person is, Walsh keeps alive the idea of philosophy not only as linguistic analysis but also as the seeking of wisdom and truth.
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.


The latest from america

“People who have never heard of Weegee can describe him,” Bonanos writes, because he created Hollywood’s idea of the newspaper photographer.”
Eve TushnetOctober 10, 2018
The major foci of Foucault's work were the histories of madness, the social sciences, penitentiaries and sexuality.
José DueñoOctober 10, 2018
The Catholic Church needs to recognize that moved from a secular public sphere—marked by separate and specialized spheres of economy, science, faith and so forth that manage their own concerns in an insular way—to a postsecular public sphere, in which a multiplicity of voices and expertise are
Maureen K. DayOctober 05, 2018
Karen J. Johnson focuses on the minority of white Catholics who felt that racial equality was a moral and religious, not merely political, issue.
Benjamin IvryOctober 05, 2018