USA Northeast Province releases names of Jesuits credibly accused of sexual abuse

Photo: iStockFordham University at Lincoln Center (photo: iStock)

Following similar moves by other U.S. provinces, the USA Northeast Province of the Society of Jesus on Jan. 15 released a list of members with credible allegations of sexual abuse of minors.

“At the heart of this crisis is the painful, sinful and illegal harm done to children by those whom they should have been able to trust,” John J. Cecero, S.J., the provincial of the Northeast Province, said in a statement. “We did not know any best practices to handle these violations many decades ago and regrettably made mistakes along the way.”

Advertisement

The list includes 50 names and includes allegations dating back to 1950. Fourteen of the named Jesuits are still living. The Associated Press reported that all the alleged abuse took place before 1997. At least 32 of the Jesuits on the list have allegations that were first reported in or after 2002, when a series of articles in The Boston Globe exposed widespread cover up of sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests and when U.S. bishops adopted a zero-tolerance sexual abuse policy. The Northeast Province covers Jesuit ministries in New England and New York as well as northern New Jersey.

The list includes 50 names and includes allegations dating back to 1950. Fifteen of the named Jesuits are still living.

Among those named on the list are a former headmaster and president of Fordham Preparatory School, an all-boys high school adjacent to the campus of Fordham University in the Bronx. Eugene J. O’Brien, S.J., was headmaster of the school from 1960 to 1970 and also served as president from 1970 through 1979. According to the province, abuse allegations dating back to the 1960s against Father O’Brien were first reported in 1993. A 2008 article in The New York Times reported that an allegation of abuse of a minor against Father O’Brien was settled in 1997 by the Society of Jesus and the Archdiocese of New York for $25,000.

Christopher J. Devron, S.J., the president of Fordham Prep, said in a statement that “there are no Jesuits on any of these lists who serve currently either at Fordham Prep or Fordham University or live presently on the University campus.”

“Any incident of abuse by a priest or teacher is one too many,” Father Devron added, “for the victim-survivors, their families, and the Church.”

The list released by the Northeast Province does not include details about where the credibly accused Jesuits lived. But at least some of them were assigned to live at Murray-Weigel Hall following their removals from ministry, a nursing home and residence located “adjacent” to Fordham, according to a statement from Fordham University president Joseph M. McShane, S.J. The residence is a short walk from Fordham Prep and near at least two other high schools.

Some of the accused were assigned to live at Murray-Weigel Hall following their removals from ministry, a nursing home and residence located “adjacent” to Fordham.

Fordham University and Fordham Prep distanced itself from decisions to place Jesuits accused of abuse at Murray-Weigel, saying in statements that the province assigned Jesuits to Murray-Weigel.

“Fordham University has not historically been empowered to decide who is assigned to reside at Murray-Weigel Hall,” Father McShane said in his statement. “Nonetheless, at Fordham’s insistence, the Northeast Province has recently removed all men with known credible accusations against them from Murray-Weigel Hall.”

In addition, Father Devron’s statement said, “The Province has agreed to not assign these men as residents to that community in the future.”

Also included on the list is John T. Ryan, S.J., who from 1989 to 1994 was an associate editor for development at America. In a statement, Matt Malone, S.J., the president and editor in chief of America Media, said he was made aware earlier this month of the allegations against Mr. Ryan, who left the Jesuits in 2002.

The Northeast Province is the final province in the United States to release a list of Jesuits facing a credible allegation, which the province said is determined by a “preponderance of evidence that the allegation is more likely true than not after investigation.

“Father Ryan is the only Jesuit on any of the provincial lists of credibly accused Jesuits who was an employee of America Media,” Father Malone said. He said that after a review of files and interviews with current staff who remember Father Ryan, “I have received no information that indicates that any member of America Media staff, then or now, had any knowledge of Father Ryan’s alleged misconduct with minors.”

Two other Jesuits included on the provincial lists—Eugene J. O'Brien, S.J., and John J. Gallen, S.J.—have ties to America.

The Northeast Province statement lists one of Father O’Brien’s assignments as the Gregorian Foundation, whose offices were located in the building that housed America in New York. Father Gallen was named in the list released by the Midwest Province last month, which noted that his “assignment” from 1995 to 2007 was at “America House Jesuit Community.”     

In his statement, Father Malone also noted that the building, owned by America from 1962 to 2017, housed “both Jesuits who were employed by America Media and other Jesuits who were not employees of America Media.” Beginning in 1984, that community was “the exclusive responsibility of the religious superior of the New York Province.”

Father Malone said he could not address the issue of residency for Father Ryan or any of the Jesuits on the province lists, saying that “province officials have requested that all questions unrelated to the employment history of the men on these lists be directed to their respective province office.”

A spokesman for the Northeast Province said he did not have access to the residency assignments of Jesuits on the list.

The Northeast Province is the final province in the United States to release a list of Jesuits facing a credible allegation, which the province said is determined by a “preponderance of evidence that the allegation is more likely true than not after investigation. Credibility can also be established by conviction in a court or by the admission of the truth of the allegation by the Jesuit.”

In December, other U.S. provinces released lists of Jesuits with credible allegations of abuse against minors. The Midwest Province released a list of 65 Jesuits with an “established allegation” of abuse of a minor that dated back to 1955. The Maryland Province published a list that included 19 Jesuits with credible allegations of abuse against minors dating back to 1950. Forty-two Jesuits with allegations dating back to 1955 were included on the Central and Southern Province list and the West Province published the names of 111 Jesuits dating back to 1950.

The Jesuits have more than 16,000 members across the world and they describe themselves as “the largest male religious order in the Catholic Church.”

This story is developing and it will be updated.

Correction, Jan. 15, 12:42 p.m.: The number of accused priests still living from the Northeast Province is 15, not 14 as originally reported. 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
gretchen nock
3 months ago

I would like as part of your 4th Estate duty to see who knew what, and when did they know it. Who moved them, ignored them and ultimately kept it going. The list is nothing without this.

tacronicus.cornelius@gmail.com
3 months ago

A really important point! Who within the organization was covering for the men who betrayed their vows to God and victimized Christians they were supposed to be serving? Those false shepherds need to be punished severely, each and every one of them.

Ken Osis
3 months ago

So, 50 Jesuits predominantly ministering to young people are credibly known to have sexually abused minors in 79 years.

Will you please tell us how many Jesuits were alive and in ministry during that same 79 years and just how many individual children were victims?
This will disclose to the Catholic community if being a male adult consecrated religious and ordained presbyter has offended more, the same of less than the male population of Catholic adult men, married and single, alive during the same period in the same province.
Many of us, you see, are realistic about things. We know that a person despite baptism, access to Eucharist and Reconciliation and also being Confirmed and Ordained is still not capable of sinless perfection.
We do not attribute a hyper-Christian status to clergy and do not get hysterical about fellow Christians disclosed as wilful murderers, rapists, adulterers and thieves while at the same time we do not condone any mortal sin in either group.

We do however, expect a high standard of pastoral competence in both the acceptance or rejection of people putting themselves forward for admission to ministries and offices within the community of believers and in the surveillance and governance of those admitted to such ministries and offices throughout their lives.

Old-fashioned and counter-cultural, I know, nevertheless ...

Phillip Stone
3 months ago

It might be worth stating the bleeding obvious so here goes.
Despite humanist and secular ideas developed since "the enlightenment", Almighty God has not given anyone the absolute right to privacy.
During counselling with a middle-aged woman raised in a Catholic family, she disclosed her outrage and indignation from childhood until then at having a guardian angel from whom she could keep nothing secret.

Everyone has been given the right to mortal sin by the same God Almighty. That is the meaning of free will. Just the same as the angels, humans exercise this and just the same as the angels, are held to account for it.

Am I mistaken in thinking that vows taken when entering the married state and when entering the various offices and communities within the fellowship of believers are equivalent?

So rightly, there can be no secrets between spouses in all issues pertaining to their married state and commitments to one another, so too amongst those in each, any and all ministry.
We are offered salvation as a member of a community, a fellowship, a communion while retaining the truth that we could only be judged and condemned for our own particular, individual, chosen sins = grave matter, full knowledge, full consent of the will.
The only thing that is none of our business is the one-on-one relationship between the person and God in that regard - all the other issues having social implications may be kept under watch by others.

So, we need to know the divorced and remarried, the serial adulterers, the drunkards, the violent and the sexually perverted persons within our Christian community so as to guard against their particular danger to us and those in our charge.

What am I on about, you may ask.

Doctors get to know a lot of things, I give one instance alone here.

A young man, pretending to be holy and self-sacrificing by volunteering work within the St Vincent de Paul charity common in Australia, was a wolf in sheep's clothing. Armed with the power of the money donated by good Catholics for the purpose of supporting those in poverty, he used to prey on recently widowed or abandoned young women by getting close to them by tea and sympathy and paying their bills. and then having sex with them.
I disclosed this to the President of the local conference who did nothing, claiming I must break the confidence of my source before he would even consider it credible.
Part of a bigger picture, eh?

Molly Roach
3 months ago

The meaning of free will is that we have been give the freedom to reject sin and to choose what is good. No baptized person has the "right" to commit mortal sin--that is a very distorted understanding.

Jim Spangler
3 months ago

What is interesting is that Cardinal Cupich (the favorite of Rome) was the Bishop of the Diocese of Spokane and knew that the Northwest Providence had a house full of abusers living on Gonzaga Campus in Spokane. They had no supervision and were allowed to move about without the public knowing who they were and what they had done. Our dear Cardinal Cupich does not want to go down rabbit holes, because he is afraid that he will run into a snake that will swallow him whole, which it should. Cupich, Tobin, Woerl, and others are all familiar with the homosexual abuser network within the Church. They were all political appointments of Cardinal McCarrick who made his recommendations to the pope. The whole damn bunch need to take a five mile hike off on a three mile pier. They are liars, manipulators, and care less about the Church and no longer believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior. Their only interest is access to lavish living, and a lavish lifestyle. There is no room for these people within the Church. They have destroyed credibility, and trust. Now they expect the Laity to swallow their garbage. Cut them off at the collection plate. Write your Bishops, let them know that you will no longer support this out landished practice, These people need to be laicized, and derocked. Lord send down Your Spirit and rebuild Your Church.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Join Kirsten Powers, CNN analyst and USA Today columnist, and Rev. James Martin, S.J., Editor at Large of America Media and New York Times best-selling author, for a live show celebrating the 100th episode of Jesuitical.
America Media EventsApril 24, 2019
You give us hope when we’re reporting on challenging issues in the church.
James Cappabianca April 18, 2019
For decades, Lopez has sought to re-establish our ethical relationships with the land and the other creatures who dwell on it. But Lopez, like many authors, struggles against labels.
Vincent J. MillerApril 18, 2019
St. Thomas arrives at the very center of what happened at the Last Supper, of what would happen the next day on the cross and of what happens at every subsequent Eucharist. With his own hands, Christ gives himself to us.
Terrance KleinApril 18, 2019