Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Francis X. Clooney, S.J.October 09, 2016

Cambridge, Mass.—As many readers will know, I have been studying Hinduism for over 40 years, since I first visited Kathmandu, Nepal, in 1973, to teach at St. Xavier’s School. Over the years, people have asked me what difference this study has made for me. I have always had to give a complicated answer: “not much, and everything.” I live here, in the United States, not in Nepal or India, and at best am a missionary in reverse, bringing Hinduism to the attention of American Christians; I have not become a Hindu, I am still a Catholic priest and a Jesuit; I am not a pluralist who believes that all religions are varying affirmations of the same truth, I prefer to go deep in my own tradition to interpret pluralism; I am a Catholic theologian, just a slightly different kind. People sometime persist: How then has Hinduism made a difference in my practice of Catholicism, as a priest? Often enough, I add that I almost never mention India or Hinduism in my homilies in my Sunday parish (where I’ve helped for over 19 years) – but that my study of Hinduism has changed how I preach, what I am looking for and what I find in the readings of any given day. It is hard to explain how this works out – to be deeply influenced by Hinduism in preparing my homilies, while yet almost never mentioning Hinduism from the pulpit.

But I found today that my reading of the Gospel deeply resonated with my study of Hinduism, and that it perhaps serves as a good example. Let me explain this by several general observations and then several particular comments on the Gospel read in church today, the ten lepers.

On the general level: First, I think it quite in keeping with Hindu tradition that I never mention Hinduism from the pulpit: the point is to address people where they are, in the tradition where they belong, without disturbing them by complicated new information. One finds God where one is, not by going somewhere else. So why would I preach on Hinduism, to Catholics? Simply explain the words of the Bible to Catholics, that is enough. If one preaches to Hindus, I suppose, words from a Hindu scripture would be enough. Second, Hindu teachers tend to read texts without much reference to historical context or to current events: they dwell in the story at hand, and bring its details to life. I am not much of a story-teller anyway, I am sure, but I am always content likewise simply to go inside the readings of the day, letting the words roll over me, so to speak, to become, for the moment, all that matters: in Greek, which I can check, and with a sense of the Hebrew that I must pick up from checking others’ translations. So one goes deep inside a Gospel passage, for instance, and sees what one finds. This is all the matters for speaker and listeners on a Sunday morning. Third, sacred texts are texts; the ideas may be fine, but the transformative power of the text lies in each and every word, so one must read very closely and carefully. All one needs to do is help us all to really hear the words. To preach well, depends a lot simply on reading slowly and attentively; Hindu teachers too often simply go over a text, word by word.

I had pondered today’s simple Gospel all week long:

On the way to Jerusalem Jesus was going through the region between Samaria and Galilee. As he entered a village, ten lepers approached him. Keeping their distance, they called out, saying, ‘Jesus, Master, have mercy on us!’ When he saw them, he said to them, ‘Go and show yourselves to the priests.’ And as they went, they were made clean. Then one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, praising God with a loud voice. He prostrated himself at Jesus’ feet and thanked him. And he was a Samaritan. Then Jesus asked, ‘Were not ten made clean? But the other nine, where are they? none of them found to return and give praise to God except this foreigner?’ Then he said to him, ‘Get up and go on your way; Was your faith has made you well.’ (Luke 17:11-19)

Having read so many Hindu texts, my expectation usually is that the message is in the details. So with my congregation, I began with a question: Why does Jesus send them on their way to the priests before he heals them? We may be misled, by the end of the passage, into thinking that only the Samaritan had faith. Yet all ten were people of faith, willing to expose themselves and risk everything by going to the priests, even unclean: obey, even when there are no visible reasons to. It was only on the road that they were cleansed of their disease. Their faith came first, before any signs of a cure.

Given my interreligious learning, I am also alert to the danger of making one religion look good at the expense of another: so even here, there is no point in making it seem as if Jews are ungrateful and the Samaritan leper the example of gratitude. All ten risked everything in going to the priests; the nine Jewish lepers (if they were all Jewish) were obeying the command of Jesus, to go first to the priests. Obedience too is a virtue. It could hardly be surprising that a Samaritan leper would be the one to consider that encounter with the priests less important—the priests are presumably Jewish, and he is not: what does he have to lose, in turning back? This is not a Gospel that makes Jews look bad and Samaritans look good. I have known too many Hindus to want to make one religion look good, merely at the expense of another.

But what then is special about this tenth leper? He praises God on the way back, and might just as well have praised God on his way home to Samaria. So why is he special? It is here that a Hindu instinct comes to the fore, since anyone who has studied Hinduism will immediately resonate with what the Samaritan actually does: “He prostrated himself at Jesus’ feet and thanked him.” Thanks yes, but in the posture of surrender, prostration, jumps out as the perfect gesture: for it is there, where Jesus is, that the healing actually took place. To be at the feet of the Lord Jesus, a Hindu teacher will tell us, is the perfect place to be, the highest goal in life. This is a superlative act of great love that any Hindu would recognize.

It is also a sacramental moment: the words are not enough, praising God is not enough, nor even thanking Jesus “keeping his distance” as at the start of the story. “Here and now” too would resonate with most Hindu readers. And so, in my homily, I detoured briefly to the first reading from 2 Kings, where Elijah cures Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Aram. I went there not because of the leprosy, surely the intention of those compiling the Sunday readings, but because of what Naaman wants as he leaves:

Then Naaman said, ‘If not, please let two mule-loads of earth be given to your servant; for your servant will no longer offer burnt-offering or sacrifice to any god except the Lord. (2 Kings 5:17)

Two mule-loads of earth: it is hard to imagine being more material, physical, local, than this: Naaman wants the very soil of Israel, that he might stand of it for his prayer: not just to thank God, or praise the God of Israel, but in a rather primal fashion, to abide on the soil of Israel for his worship. This too—an idea with Biblical roots, to be sure—makes perfect sense in light of my understanding of Hinduism: God here and now, such that one can prostrate before God, and in a holy place, on sacred ground, because God was here. God, who is everywhere, is especially present in some holy places. Both Catholics and Hindus appreciate material, holy, tangible things.

Such was the substance of my reading of the text. Readers may observe that there is no proof here, no claims about the influence of Hinduism on the Bible, and no claim about a reading of the Gospel that could not have happened otherwise. All this is true. But my point is more subtle: what I noticed and noted in the Gospel both moved away from the theme of “thanksgiving”—but later returned to it in a heightened fashion. I became sensitive to certain odd dynamics—the command to go to the priests before the cure occurred, the praise of the Samaritan who had no real reason to go to the priests and who easily turn back, and the event of his prostration—because I have read so many Hindu texts that resonate with such turns and eventualities.

Still, of course, one might expect more, if one wishes for a Hindu reading of a Gospel. But there is more power, that goes deeper and lasts longer, in the subtle and simple. I doubt if I would have noticed what I did in the Gospel, without my study of Hinduism. That study has brought out the power of this tale of thanksgiving as utter devotion, here and now. And that is the point: studying another religion helps us to find in our own what we would not have ever noticed there.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
6 years 12 months ago
Christians and Jews share the same Faith. We are told that the reading of Holy Scripture is in itself a Supernatural Act (Note: Silently reading Scripture and not aloud was an oddity according to the Father's, likely because of the strength of the Jewish Oral Tradition). I am not aware of any requirement to understand... We even see it as important to pronounce the words over the deceased at a burial. The Liturgy literally tells us that the words of the Gospel washes away sin. It's highly unlikely that every Jew that showed up at Herod's Temple always understood the Hebrew Scripture being read at the Temple. Many dispersed Jews spoke other languages. Akin to every Catholic understanding every word of the old Latin Liturgy... I personally think about the Poor uneducated Irish who risked imprisonment or their lives attending a Latin Mass in a clearing in a field away from the English conquerors. Imagine that-listening to a Scripture in Latin with no Missal! More and more Mystery! One could go on and on! It's truly a wonderful Mystery! No matter the instrumentality of how one gets there... Scripture also says that God desires that all men be saved. (Even the deaf in the Oral Tradition!). In fact, Catholic Liturgy reverences the Holy Scriptures and reverence Scripture using the literal equivalent of the body of her Lord Jesus (or words to that effect). Doesn't take much time reading the Gospels that one comes across talk of instantaneous healing occurring from touching Jesus. It's a great Mystery, and I am no expert! And end here... It's important to remember that the Church teaches that the Holy Scriptures are inspired by God (Note the word "inspired" in Catholicism has a specific meaning). That one doesn't require a PHD from an Ivy League School to encounter the living God. For He meets us where we are. Lord give me the faith of a peasant... Suscipe Vivat Jesus! in Christ Jesus-God come in the flesh, Blessed be the Holy Trinity...
jose mathews
6 years 12 months ago
Thanksgiving is part of culture or for that matter Jewish culture. In the Book of Genesis Abel offered his thanks to God which was accepted by God the Father while Cain's offerings was rejected by God because of his unbelief in God or lack of willingness to thank God. The lone leper a Samaritan came back and thanked Jesus for the cure while the so-called Jews left on their own way without bothering to thank or completely forgetting about the Cause behind the miracle, that the Person of Jesus was not attended to thereafter, which is symptomatic of the present generation of people. We are turning away from the Creator, the Cause and indulging in selfish or material activities or we learn to practice sin,conveniently setting aside Biblical values and teachings of Jesus.
Venkat Gopal
6 years 11 months ago
"So why would I preach on Hinduism, to Catholics?" If this is really your position Indeed "Why would you preach about Christianity to Hindus?" Why did you travel to India to convert them to Christianity." Please practice what you preach and be consistent - not changing according to the audience -saying each person go deeper into their own traditions when speaking as a Catholic priest to a Catholic audience, yet travelling to India to get them to renounce their tradition and accepting yours! "To be at the feet of the Lord Jesus, a Hindu teacher will tell us, is the perfect place to be, the highest goal in life. This is a superlative act of great love that any Hindu would recognize" Quite true. Hinduism says that all paths lead to the same goal. Now where can we find a Catholic who says: "To be at the feet of the Lord Rama/Krishna/Buddha, a Christian teacher will tell us, is the perfect place to be, the highest goal in life. This is a superlative act of great love that any Christian would recognize"? If one wants to be truly Catholic (i.e. expansive and broad minded) look to the tradition of Sanatan Dharma (aka Hinduism) which says "Like waters of the various rivers all flow into the ocean so do all faiths lead us to the Creator" Indeed a Hindu teacher will say "Be at the feet of any realized saint or master which includes Lord Jesus but is not exclusive to Lord Jesus - we have had many incarnations before (Lord Rama/Krishna/Buddha) and since and will continue to have as long as the yearning is there for people to meet a great soul"
Henry George
6 years 9 months ago
Fr. Clooney, S.J. I really don't know what to say if a Jesuit thinks it is only because he studied Hinduism that he became aware of what the Gospel means. Have you read the Christian Mystics as thoroughly as you have read Hindu Texts ? Have you studied what the Fathers of the Church have to say about the Gospels ? Do your professed duty and study Christianity - for if you did you would not have to rely upon Wikipedia to tell you what you should have known about Nicholas Ferrar. Please read up on the Christian Traditions, for therein lies the roots of your faith.

The latest from america

Rep. Kevin McCarthy, a Republican from California, leaves the floor of the U.S. House floor after being ousted as speaker on Oct. 3. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
There is a deeper problem than the chaos in the U.S. House: the question of what a government is for, and how it is to function beyond matters that a bare majority can vote through.
Sam Sawyer, S.J.October 04, 2023
Pope Francis did not attend Vatican II, but from the beginning of his pontificate, he set out with determination to continue its implementation.
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 04, 2023
I have spent the better part of the past two years trying to understand what synodality is. Today, it finally started to click.
Zac DavisOctober 04, 2023
During this coming election cycle, Americans (including Catholics) need to hear far more about the moral duty to protect the environment.
The EditorsOctober 04, 2023