Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
donald trump stands in front of a pro life sign speaking at the march for life in 2020U.S. President Donald Trump addresses thousands of pro-life supporters during the 47th annual March for Life in Washington Jan. 24, 2020. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America pushed back April 20, 2023, on a statement from the former president's campaign that abortion should be left to the states and not be a federal issue after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in its June 2022 Dobbs decision. (OSV News photo/Leah Millis, Reuters)

WASHINGTON (OSV News) — A national pro-life group pushed back on a statement from former President Donald Trump arguing that abortion should be left to the states post-Dobbs, calling the position “unacceptable.”

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a group which works to elect pro-life candidates and which previously backed the one-time Republican president and many of his endorsed candidates, issued a statement April 20 criticizing comments Trump’s campaign made to The Washington Post.

“President Donald J. Trump believes that the Supreme Court, led by the three justices which he supported, got it right when they ruled this is an issue that should be decided at the state level,” a spokesperson for the Trump campaign said in an article about how the declared or likely Republican 2024 presidential contenders are navigating a shifting legal and political landscape in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

The high court overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision and related jurisprudence that had made abortion a constitutional right, and returned the matter of regulating abortion to the legislature.

“President Trump’s assertion that the Supreme Court returned the issue of abortion solely to the states is...a morally indefensible position for a self-proclaimed pro-life presidential candidate to hold.”

“Republicans have been trying to get this done for 50 years, but were unable to do so,” Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung told the Post. “President Trump, who is considered the most pro-life president in history, got it done. He will continue these policies when reelected to the White House. Like President Reagan before him, President Trump supports exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother.”

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA Pro-Life America, pushed back on those comments in her own April 20 statement, saying, “President Trump’s assertion that the Supreme Court returned the issue of abortion solely to the states is a completely inaccurate reading of the Dobbs decision and is a morally indefensible position for a self-proclaimed pro-life presidential candidate to hold.”

The criticism was notable for Dannenfelser and her organization, which often praised Trump for governing as “the most pro-life president in history.”

President of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America: “Life is a matter of human rights, not states’ rights.”

The Trump campaign’s statement to the Post also was noteworthy as Trump has remained largely mum about the landmark Dobbs decision. Media reports including The Washington Post’s coverage, have indicated Trump told advisers he does not wish to engage on the issue of abortion. On his Truth Social platform Jan. 1, Trump blamed the issue of abortion and pro-life voters for the Republican Party’s underperformance in the 2022 midterm election cycle.

Dannenfelser argued in response to the campaign’s statement, “Life is a matter of human rights, not states’ rights.”

“Saying that the issue should only be decided at the states is an endorsement of abortion up until the moment of birth, even brutal late-term abortions in states like California, Illinois, New York and New Jersey,” she said. “The only way to save these children is through federal protections, such as a 15-week federal minimum standard when the unborn child can feel excruciating pain.”

Dannenfelser added SBA “will oppose any presidential candidate who refuses to embrace at a minimum a 15-week national standard to stop painful late-term abortions while allowing states to enact further protections.”

“The Supreme Court made clear in its decision that it was returning the issue to the people to decide through their elected representatives in the states and in Congress,” she said. “Holding to the position that it is exclusively up to the states is an abdication of responsibility by anyone elected to federal office. This holds especially true for the president, more than any other federal official, because he or she has a responsibility to forge national consensus and progress on the most egregious human rights violation of our time.”

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

City and state/province, or if outside Canada or the U.S., city and country. 
When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.

The latest from america

"This is not about politics," Bishop Seitz said. "It's about the Gospel."
Kate Scanlon - OSV NewsFebruary 23, 2024
“I’m just curious,” sociologist Tricia Bruce told OSV News. “I come with questions. I don’t come with an agenda or something that I’m trying to do or get out of this.”
Maria Wiering - OSV NewsFebruary 23, 2024
“If you talk today with the widows who have lost their husbands, and mothers who have lost their sons, you will understand why Russia did not succeed.”
Gerard O’ConnellFebruary 23, 2024
A conversation with Phadadria M. Randall, L.C.S.W., on “Inside Man” (2006) for Black for History Month.
John DoughertyFebruary 23, 2024