Our readersOctober 16, 2020
Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, celebrates Mass at St. Pius X Church in El Paso Sept. 23, 2019. The El Paso bishop tested positive Oct. 3, 2020, for the coronavirus disease and is in self quarantine. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)

Bishop Mark Seitz of the Diocese of El Paso weighed in on Catholic voting and single-issue political strategies in an analysis published on America’s website that is sure to become recommended reading for voters of faith (“Bishop Seitz: Single-issue voting has corrupted Christian political witness”). He addresses society’s ills through the viewpoint of faith, not politics, and criticizes “single-issue political strategies disconnected from an integral ethic of human life.”

“Catholics who wish to take the demands of our faith and social teaching seriously have long had reason to feel politically homeless at election time,” the bishop writes. “Neither party and neither presidential candidate reflects in a consistent way the ethic of love and life expressed by Jesus in the Gospels.”

The article continues to generate feedback from our audience. The following in a sampling of online reader comments, edited for length and clarity.


This article should be required reading and discussion in all Catholic parishes, schools, colleges and universities, religious education programs and seminaries. It should be analyzed for its capacity for moral reasoning, how to apply Catholic social doctrine to the injustices that prevail, and to understand what goes into the intellectual formation of a bishop. Obviously, we need more like Bishop Seitz. Single-issue voting is another reason young people are leaving the church.

—Gabriel Marcella

As a pro-choice American Catholic, regarding a woman’s right to determine whether and how she prevents pregnancy and whether she carries a pregnancy to term, I just want to say this: In no way do I read Bishop Seitz as having endorsed or supported or turned a blind eye to my position. He is calling all Catholics, pro-choice Catholics included, to wake up every morning to recall [their faith] not only in mind but in practice. I, for one, am profoundly grateful for his trust that we are capable. He didn’t give anyone a pass here. He shared his faith and his hope.

—J. Jones

This is a brilliant article, naming many of the frustrations I faced as a single-issue conservative voter for decades. The complexity of our current politics makes a perfect decision in this election impossible. So we are faced with choosing the lesser of two evils, or pragmatically choosing our preferred red or blue while holding our nose, or maybe going third party (yet again). But we are called, at every moment, to do what love requires. This article will be a big part of my discernment for this election.

—Paul Pfaffenburger

This is a very helpful guide as I struggle with my vote this year. I note that Bishop Seitz ends up saying that it is my decision and not making a blanket statement about a Catholic cannot vote for [fill in the blank] because of a single issue. This article is giving me some consolation and a direction for my prayer as I approach my vote when my mail-in ballot comes. May God grant us right judgment and holy wisdom!

—Daniel Leetch

Thank you for a nuanced view of our political problem of single-issue voting. One aspect of preventing abortion that is given little attention is understanding why women seek abortions. It is a decision based on both emotion and practical considerations. If we could find a way to teach about choosing wisely before pregnancy occurs, we would be doing good in the world. And such teaching would be far more subtle than “keep your legs together.” In the meantime, we need to consider the welfare of our government when we vote in this election. We are in a dangerous place.

—Lisa Weber

The issue of abortion is out of the hands of either the Democratic Party or Mr. Biden, should he be elected. The issue is in the hands of the Supreme Court. If the court decides not to overturn Roe v. Wade, the only way to change the law is by constitutional amendment or by packing the Supreme Court with justices who, contrary to judicial ethics, have committed to a decision before hearing the case.

—Arthur Menu

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

City and state/province, or if outside Canada or the U.S., city and country. 
When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.

The latest from america

During this second surge medical and support teams had no time to be anxious about themselves as scores of Covid-19 cases began arriving at Holy Family’s emergency room doors.
Kevin ClarkeMay 13, 2021
The 54-year-old priest said in a May 9 letter to the university community that based on the results of this review, he would begin taking part outpatient therapy program for alcohol use and stress management.
This week on “Inside the Vatican,” host Colleen Dulle and veteran Vatican correspondent Gerard O’Connell examine how binding the Vatican's letter and the U.S. bishops’ agreements are, along with what decisions the bishops now face.
Inside the VaticanMay 13, 2021
It’s the second time Francis and Fernandez have met and added yet another wrinkle in the Argentine pope’s sometimes strained relationship with the governments of his native country.