Click here if you don’t see subscription options
In this Feb. 26, 2019, photo, Cardinal George Pell leaves the County Court in Melbourne, Australia. Australia’s highest court on Tuesday, April 7, 2020 will judge Pell’s appeal against convictions for molesting two teenage choirboys more than two decades ago. But the legal battle over the world’s most senior Catholic convicted of sexually abusing children may not end there. (AP Photo/Andy Brownbill)

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Australia’s highest court on Tuesday will judge Cardinal George Pell’s appeal against convictions for molesting two teenage choirboys more than two decades ago. But the legal battle over the world’s most senior Catholic convicted of sexually abusing children may not end there.

The High Court could deliver Pope Francis’ former finance minister a sweeping victory or an absolute defeat. Or the seven judges could settle on one of several options in between that could extend the appeal process for another year or more.

The 78-year-old cleric cleric has spent 13 months in two high-security prisons at high risk of having a coronavirus outbreak, and he would have strong grounds for being released on bail if the court case is extended.

Pell was sentenced by a Victoria state County Court judge in March last year to six years in prison for sexually abusing two 13-year-old choirboys in a back room of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in Melbourne in December 1996 while he was archbishop of Australia’s second-largest city.

Pell was also convicted of indecently assaulting one of the boys by painfully squeezing his genitals after a Mass in early 1997. Pell must serve three years and eight months behind bars before he becomes eligible for parole.

One of the former choirboys died of a heroin overdose in 2014 aged 31. Pell has largely been convicted on the testimony of the survivor, now the father of a young family aged in his 30s, who first went to police in 2015. The identities of both victims are concealed by state law.

A jury had unanimously convicted Pell of all five charges in December 2018, but he was spared prison for three months while he underwent replacement surgery for both knees.

The High Court has examined whether the Victorian Court of Appeal was correct in its 2-1 majority decision in August to uphold the jury verdicts.

Pell’s lawyers hope that the High Court finds that the appeal court made mistakes, acquits Pell and he is freed the same day from the Barwon Prison outside Melbourne where he spends 23 hours a day alone in his cell.

Prosecutors have argued that if mistakes were made, the case should be sent back to the appeals court to be heard again — a process that would set Pell back to where he was a year ago.

Melbourne Law School Professor Jeremy Gans, who attended the two-day High Court hearing last month, said a delay in the case’s resolution could encourage Pell to apply for bail, given his relatively short sentence, advanced age, poor health and the COVID-19 risk in prison.

“He’d have a pretty compelling case for bail in these circumstances,” Gans said.

Pell withdrew an earlier bail application without a hearing. Some lawyers suspect he did not want his release on bail to reduce the urgency for overturning the convictions.

Much of the High Court appeal focused on whether the abuses of the two choirboys in the priests' sacristy could have been committed in a window of only five or six minutes that the evidence suggested Pell had available to him after a Mass.

If the High Court decides there was insufficient time, the judges could acquit him of the oral rape conviction and three convictions for indecency that stem from the sacristy allegations. But the conviction for squeezing the surviving choirboy’s genitals more than a month later could still stand.

Some lawyers regard this as an unlikely scenario, but it would result in Pell being quickly released given the time he has already served.

Even a result at the extremes — Pell is acquitted of all charges or his appeal is entirely dismissed — may not put the case to rest.

Victoria state has abandoned a prohibition against double jeopardy which used to guarantee that no one was tried or punished more than once for the same crime.

The change was made in response to developments in DNA matching which has provided damning new evidence against suspects long after they were acquitted.

If a new witness brought compelling new evidence of either Pell’s innocence or guilt, a new trial could result.

“Nothing is final in Victorian law anymore,” Gans said.

If Pell does win his appeal, he will experience a different kind of freedom in a country locked down by coronavirus than he did three years ago when he voluntarily returned to Melbourne from the Vatican determined to clear his name.

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

City and state/province, or if outside Canada or the U.S., city and country. 
When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

At center: Republican U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson sits beside Democratic President Joe Biden during the annual National Prayer Breakfast at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Feb. 1, 2024. (OSV News photo/Evelyn Hockstein, Reuters)
Your enemies are children of God—and that includes the presidential candidate you can’t stand and his supporters.
“Brothers and sisters, humility is everything. It is what saves us from the Evil One,” Pope Francis said at today’s general audience, concluding his cycle of catechesis on virtue.
Pope FrancisMay 22, 2024
“Authentic palliative care is radically different from euthanasia, which is never a source of hope or genuine concern for the sick and dying,” the pope said in a message to the first International Interfaith Symposium on Palliative Care in Toronto.
Pope Francis greets Agbonkhianmeghe Orobator, S.J., and Julie Sullivan, the president of Santa Clara University, on March 18, 2024. 
Father Agbonkhianmeghe Orobator is the first dean of the Jesuit School of Theology in Berkeley born outside of the United States.