U.S. bishops ‘gravely disappointed’ with House passage of Equality Act

Wikimedia Commons

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- Five U.S. bishops, chairmen of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' committees or subcommittees, said May 17 they were "gravely disappointed" with the U.S. House of Representatives passage of the Equality Act.

In an 236-173 vote, the House approved the measure, H.R. 5, which would add the new terms "sexual orientation" and "gender identity," as well as "pregnancy ... or a related medical condition," to the definition of "sex" in federal civil rights laws, the bishops noted. It also would expand the types of entities covered under those laws and it exempt itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

Advertisement

 

"Rather than offering meaningful protections for individuals, the Equality Act would impose sweeping new norms that negatively impact the unborn, health care, charitable services, schools, personal privacy, athletics, free speech, religious liberties and parental rights," said the chairmen.

[Don’t miss the latest news from the church and the world. Sign up for our daily newsletter.]

Signing the statement were: Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas City, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities; Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Florida, chairman of the USCCB Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development; Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Kentucky, chairman of the USCCB Committee for Religious Liberty; Bishop Michael C. Barber of Oakland, California, chairman of the USCCB Committee on Catholic Education; and Bishop James D. Conley of Lincoln, Nebraska, chairman of the USCCB Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage.

"Our faith calls us to uphold every individual's dignity and rights against unjust discrimination -- including in employment, housing and services -- regardless of characteristics or background," the bishops said.

"Rather than offering meaningful protections for individuals, the Equality Act would impose sweeping new norms that negatively impact the unborn, health care, charitable services, schools, personal privacy, athletics, free speech, religious liberties and parental rights," they continued.

H.R. 5 contains "unsound definitions of 'sex' and 'gender identity' (that) would erase women's distinct, hard-won recognition in federal laws," the bishops said. "Its sex-based nondiscrimination terms would end women's shelters and many single-sex schools. It would close faith-based foster care and adoption agencies that honor children's rights to a mother and father."

[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]

The five prelates added that the bill "would even act as an abortion mandate."

"We must pursue justice and equality for anyone denied it; but this is a regrettable approach," they said. "We are gravely disappointed with the act's passage in the U.S. House."

Earlier in May, Archbishop Kurtz and Bishops Dewane, Barber and Conley were part of a group of a dozen Christian leaders who signed on to a letter to House members voicing religious freedom concerns with the Equality Act.

In the letter, the signers said they have "grave concern over the devastating consequences to religious freedom" should the bill pass in its current form.

The Equality Act "would devastate the core ministries of a wide range of religious groups, especially those ministries that serve the most vulnerable and that help form members of our faiths to serve the common good," they said.

"These religious freedom concerns are not hypothetical or academic. The Equality Act undercuts the religious freedom of millions of Americans who live out their faith by serving others through religiously motivated charitable ministries and organizations."

The letter cited several potential ill effects:

-- "Houses of worship and other religious spaces will be turned into places of 'public accommodation.'"

-- "Federal funds will be denied to thousands of houses of worship, schools, and charities that currently receive them."

-- "Religious adoption and foster care providers would be devastated, harming innocent children and families."

-- "Many privately funded shelters for the homeless and victims of domestic violence would be rendered illegal, ripping a hole in the social safety net."

-- "Core rights would be stripped from religious colleges and universities."

-- "Houses of worship, religious charities, and religious individuals will lose the protection of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act."

-- "Religious individuals would be forced to take part in weddings and funerals that violate their religious beliefs."

Archbishop Kurtz and Bishops Dewane and Conley, on March 20, sent their own letter to members of Congress on the Equality Act, contending the bill would "regulate thought, belief and speech," "explicitly retract religious freedom" granted by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, "hinder quality health care," "endanger privacy," "threaten charitable services" and "exclude people from various career paths and livelihoods."

"The Equality Act would impose sweeping regulations to the detriment of society as a whole" and its "definitions alone would remove women and girls from protected legal existence," the three bishops said in March. "Furthermore, the act also fails to recognize the difference between the person -- who has dignity and is entitled to recognition of it -- and the actions of a person, which have ethical and social ramifications. Conflating the two will introduce a plethora of further legal complications," they said.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Annette Magjuka
4 months ago

Sorry bishops, the "religious liberty" (to discriminate) should not be paid for by taxpayer funds. If your religion includes firing LGBTQ people, banning them from your schools, making women second class citizens, refusing needed medical care to women medically dangerous pregnancies (giving preference at all times to her fetus, never to the health of the "host"--the WOMAN), etc etc--sorry, guys, that is NOT OK. You love the term, "unjust discrimination," implying that discrimination against women and LGBTQ people is "just." I fully support the house bill. I am hoping and praying that the Democrats sweep the elections in 2020 so we can stop the insanity and cruelty that is happening in our country. The bishops have a hell of a nerve, insisting on the right to discriminate. They should be spending every waking hour prostrating themselves in shame over the sex scandals and cover up of priests RAPING CHILDREN. Bishops, take a seat. You have zero moral authority.

Nora Bolcon
4 months ago

Amen Annette!

SHELLEY HIBBLER
3 months 3 weeks ago

Annette, I whole heartedly agree! Religious freedom shouldn’t include being discriminatory!

E. Commerce
4 months ago

This would seem to violate the 1st Amendment?

Richard Barbieri
4 months ago

It seems the bishops claim the gift of prophecy, while speaking in catastrophic tongues. Odd that these MEN sound so concerned with harms that might be done to WOMEN, and that they actually maintain that the act would “regulate thought and belief.” No wonder some fear theocracy more than democracy.

Nora Bolcon
4 months ago

Same treatment, not special treatment, is all women and girls need or want in our country and in our churches.

Bishops need to start realizing we are done with their discriminating against women and LGBT anywhere and that if they want our church to survive much longer in the western hemisphere they had better repent of their misogyny and start ordaining women the same as men and that means women priests, bishops, cardinals and Popes.

We know now that America has one of the lowest abortion rates in the world because women get to choose instead of old grey bishops. Everywhere abortion is a crime abortions are at their highest rates globally, as well as maternal death rates. We will no longer die to keep up your lies.

Bishops you are the ones who need to change and start treating women the same as you want to be treated just as Jesus commanded you, and always exactly the same as men, both in and out of church.

SHELLEY HIBBLER
3 months 3 weeks ago

Nora, exactly! More and more minorities are leaving the church bc of such discriminatory practices. These bishops need to stay out of our appointments w/ doctors and stop trying to control us all together.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Tania Tetlow, president of Loyola University New Orleans, remembers her friend and mentor Cokie Roberts, who passed away on Sept. 17.
Tania TetlowSeptember 20, 2019
To listen carefully to an arguing group is to gain a peculiar glimpse into the desires and anxieties of that group.
Pádraig Ó TuamaSeptember 20, 2019
His face painted red with urucum, a man participates in a march by indigenous people through the streets of Atalaia do Norte in Brazil's Amazon region on March 27, 2019. Indigenous were protesting a central government plan to turn control of health care over to municipalities, in effect destroying a federal program of indigenous health care. (CNS photo/Paul Jeffrey)
But the Pan-Amazon Synod’s organizers say much of the unhappiness with the its working document simply reflects Eurocentricism. Many critics “have little knowledge of the Amazon and in some cases have no commitment to its people.”
Eduardo Campos LimaSeptember 20, 2019
Dancers perform before Pope Francis leads a vigil with young people at the Soamandrakizay diocesan field in Antananarivo, Madagascar, Sept. 7, 2019. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
In all three countries, Pope Francis pleaded for protection of the environment. Mining by foreign companies to extract precious minerals has been a major problem in Madagascar and Mozambique. In Madagascar, deforestation is especially a threat.
Gerard O’ConnellSeptember 20, 2019