Now that the midterms are over, let’s stop obsessing over the Trump Show

U.S President Donald Trump gestures outside the Elysee Palace after his talks with French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris on Nov. 10. (AP Photo/Thibault Camus)U.S President Donald Trump gestures outside the Elysee Palace after his talks with French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris on Nov. 10. (AP Photo/Thibault Camus)

The presidency of Donald J. Trump has produced at least one boost to the prospects of American democracy: The turnout in this month’s midterm election, among both Democrats and Republicans, was at its highest since 1970, at least. The incessant barrage of political spectacles that the president excels in providing—an unfortunate result of what I called, earlier this year, a “cult of the presidency” that constantly demands our attention—is getting people to the polls. If this reality TV star has turned politics into his latest show, voting offers us the chance for a cameo, in the form of an opportunity to help squash the opposing team of fellow citizens.

I would like to think that more participation is a good thing, especially against widespread voter-suppression efforts. But I am worried about what we are participating in.

Advertisement

The Democratic conquest of the House of Representatives promises to heighten the drama. Now, rather than being relegated to the minority-party sideshow, Mr. Trump’s foils can escalate their #resistance. We are on the edges of our seats. Can Democrats topple him with subpoenas and inquiries? Will he make a deal with them to get his border wall? What insults are in store for Nancy Pelosi? Whatever happens, at least, we know this: It will be about him, him and him, and about us versus them.

I would like to think that more voter participation is a good thing. But I am worried about what we are participating in.

For some years now, I have been living in an alternate universe by writing a book on a radical political tradition that also happens to have essentially bipartisan support in this country: cooperative business. It finds champions from Paul Ryan and Mike Pence on the right to Bernie Sanders and Kirsten Gillibrand on the left. And yet, perhaps precisely because of that lurking consensus, this tradition does not get nearly the attention or prioritization it deserves. A good idea does not make for a good wedge.

This may be for the best. If pro-cooperative policies did get more attention, they would get swallowed into a wormhole. If someone on one side advocated them loudly, everyone on the other side would have to stand in relentless opposition. By being discreet, bills encouraging credit unions and employee ownership have passed with bipartisan support during recent months.

When the president and cable news notice them, issues are not issues anymore, just spectacles. These include some of the major decisions concerning the protection of life.

A significant majority of Americans agree about the reality of climate change and the need to take action, for instance—at least in the abstract. But politicians treat the planet as a black-and-white matter of partisanship, thanks to their respective party coalitions. Research suggests that Republicans would be quite supportive of proactive climate policies if they heard it from Republican politicians but not if they only hear it from Democrats. Meanwhile, we are losing the opportunity for meaningful collective action.

The young have had enough of the show. They cannot afford to tolerate political entertainment at their expense.

Tooth-and-nail battles over abortion have also prevented agreements that could reduce the number of deaths in the short term, such as pairing restrictions with better health care and workplace provisions for mothers. Grandstanding on one side produces a mirror on the other. Gone are the days of a Democratic Party aspiring to make abortion “rare,” much less permitting outright anti-abortion leaders like Jimmy Carter.

Health care, gun control, the social safety net, incarceration, immigration, L.G.B.T. rights—each of the questions that relate to protecting the dignity of life in this country are ruined by made-for-TV performances. Reasonable policies on virtually every divisive issue have been demonstrated in other countries to work better than in our system. Yet the chances of learning from such examples appears to be approximately nil. Meanwhile, politics descends ever further into poisonous race-baiting, the scapegoating of vulnerable people and the cynical manipulation of procedure.

The thing is, maybe we actually like victimizing each other and never addressing basic problems. Maybe it is part of American moxie, the urge to dominate the world that we have succeeded at so brilliantly over the past century—economically, militarily and culturally. In this view, compassion is an exercise in restraint, even mediocrity. It holds us back from ensuring that a small minority of us can become spectacularly powerful. Other countries might do better at serving their people, but we prefer hegemony.

The young have had enough of the show. They are electing women and people of color who cannot afford to tolerate political entertainment at their expense. This week, Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezjoined hundreds of youth activists to demand action on climate change at the office of her presumptive Majority Leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi. Those activists are making a spectacle of their own—not about any one person, not about which party wins or loses, but about having a future on habitable planet.

Theirs is a basic, almost boring demand. It is either win-win or lose-lose. And they will only succeed by showing that their cause is bigger than the egos of the party leaders, because unlike most of those in charge, they will have to live with the consequences. Of course, activism can become its own kind of reality TV. The test of the politics in the next two years, and always, is whether we can undermine the power-seekers and serve each other.

Democracy is not a cameo. It is a way of being a neighbor.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cosgrove
3 weeks 4 days ago

Who are obsessing over Trump? And just what are they specifically obsessing about?

Mark M
3 weeks 4 days ago

Who?
The snowflakes and many Jesuits who can’t seem to understand the electoral college system. The same little ones who don’t understand why each state has two senators or why the numbers of state representatives in the House of Representatives varies. The same who don’t understand the joke about the three wolves and one lamb voting on what’s for dinner.

F C
3 weeks 4 days ago

Why do American conservatives of the Trump variety resort to abuse so quickly when they're challenged? Guilty conscience?

Bev Ceccanti
3 weeks ago

Really? Can you be more specific? I thought the article was difficult to understand too.

Stanley Kopacz
3 weeks 2 days ago

There's just something fascinating about an idiot with nuclear codes.

Terry Kane
3 weeks 2 days ago

Stan -
Some unfinished business from a different midterm thread-
Here are some more sites you might find interesting:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming
http://www.aei.org/publication/18-spectacularly-wrong-predictions-made-…
https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/climate-change/climate-alarm
Well, maybe you won't find them interesting because you probably already knew everything they have written, and you know better than all these scientists (they must not be the hard working ones of whom you wrote).
Perhaps you can answer: 1- How does one discern what the climate should be? 2- Is change not the only constant on earth? 3 - How do you explain Long Island's existence?
Thanking you in advance.

Terry Kane
3 weeks 2 days ago

^5

F C
2 weeks 5 days ago

The best evidence now says that managing climate change responsibly is the biggest collective challenge ever faced by humanity. I'd like to see way more leadership from the Church helping us to focus on this issue and its implications for our spiritual lives. How can we love God and our neighbour without husbanding God's creation, the earth?

mogli mogli
2 weeks 5 days ago

The intention for these films to sway hearts, minds and voting intentions...how ever u can watch all this stuff at uktvnow

Mike Macrie
2 weeks 1 day ago

The people who voted elected him, the people who were too lazy to vote this is what you get. You can’t help people who don’t want to help themselves. They have no one to blame but themselves.

Advertisement

The latest from america

President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on Nov. 26. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
A recent disruption of the balance of power between a chief executive and the Fourth Estate was the Trump administration’s revocation of CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s White House “hard pass.” The action was met by unanimous opposition from the press.
Ellen K. BoegelDecember 10, 2018
How should Christians interpret and implement the Gospel mandate to bring the good news to all peoples and nations?
James T. KeaneDecember 10, 2018
I for one have never known a mind more brilliant, more beautiful, more serious, more playful. The energy behind it was immeasurable, and the capacity for love.
Mark Van DorenDecember 10, 2018
Our deepest desires are God’s desires dwelling within us: desires for peace, for love, for hope, and, most of all for God. So this Advent, this season of desire, ask God to reveal to you your deepest desires.
James Martin, S.J.December 10, 2018