Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Catholic News ServiceOctober 17, 2018
U.S. Vice President Mike Pence delivers the keynote address at a solidarity dinner Oct. 25 during the annual In Defense of Christians Summit in Washington. (CNS photo/Jaclyn Lippelmann, Catholic Standard) 

INDIANAPOLIS (CNS) -- Indiana's attorney general Oct. 15 petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review and reverse a ruling by a lower court declaring unconstitutional an Indiana law that makes it illegal for women in the state to have an abortion solely based on the race, gender or disability of a fetus.

"Nothing in the Constitution prohibits states from requiring health facilities to provide an element of basic human dignity in disposing of fetuses," Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill Jr. said.

Signed in March 2016 by then-Gov. Mike Pence, the Dignity for the Unborn law also requires clinics and/or other health care facilities in possession of aborted or miscarried fetuses to dispose of them either by cremation or interment.

The law was to have gone into effect July 1, 2016, but the day before, a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction on enforcement of the law. The ruling was upheld by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, or PPINK, had filed the request for the injunction.

"Nothing in the Constitution prohibits states from requiring health facilities to provide an element of basic human dignity in disposing of fetuses," Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill Jr. said in a statement. "These tiny bodies, after all, are in fact human remains.

"Further, states have every reason and right to prohibit abortions from being performed simply as a means of selecting the race, sex, or physical condition of a child," he continued. "The right to abortion declared by our Supreme Court protects only the decision not to bear a child at all, not a right to decide which child to bear. Our nation knows only too well the bitter fruits of such discrimination."

According to Hill, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has found "a virtually identical provision in Minnesota to pass constitutional muster."

Before Hill petitioned the Supreme Court for its review of the injunction on the law, the 7th Circuit had initially approved a request by the attorney general for an "en banc" review of the matter, that is a hearing before all 11 of the court's active judges, rather than a three-judge panel.

After that approval, however, one judge recused himself from the case, resulting in the court vacating its order for the "en banc" review, Hill's office said.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

Frank Turnbull, S.J., a longtime editor at 'America' who died earlier this week, is remembered as a humble, quiet and yet forceful presence to those who knew him during his 85 years of life.
James T. KeaneJuly 18, 2025
A Reflection for Saturday of the Fifteenth Week in Ordinary Time, by Zac Davis
Zac DavisJuly 18, 2025
Trauma-informed spirituality knows better than to promise that prayer will take away all the pain. But it can offer the hope that, even in the midst of pain, there can be moments of feeling whole.
Nicole KirpalaniJuly 18, 2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu telephoned Pope Leo XIV, who urged Israel’s leader to revive negotiations and enact a ceasefire.