The Editors: The decline of data under Trump is hurting Puerto Rico

Residents wait for soldiers in helicopters to deliver food and water Oct. 13 during recovery efforts following Hurricane Maria in San Lorenzo, Puerto Rico. (CNS photo/Lucas Jackson, Reuters)Residents wait for soldiers in helicopters to deliver food and water Oct. 13 during recovery efforts following Hurricane Maria in San Lorenzo, Puerto Rico. (CNS photo/Lucas Jackson, Reuters)

The official death toll from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico stood at 58 on Dec. 6, more than two months after the storm, but few on the ground took the number from the commonwealth’s Department of Public Safety seriously. Two demographers, one from the U.S. Department of Defense, heightened this skepticism with a report suggesting that the government’s estimate of fatalities was off by a factor of 10. The researchers found that 455 more deaths than average were reported in Puerto Rico in September. This matched a CNN survey of funeral home directors, many of whom also questioned the accuracy of the official data.

Puerto Rico is obviously overwhelmed dealing with the aftermath of the storm, but it is bizarre to imagine future historians writing that they have no idea how many people perished in one of the worst storms in U.S. history, as if it happened in a pre-modern era instead of in the 21st century. Then again, there seems to be an epidemic of vanishing data in a political environment where unpleasant facts are wished away.

Advertisement

The Trump administration has scrubbed data on climate change from federal agency websites, and the Republican leadership in Congress has dismissed attempts to measure accurately the effects of its health care and tax cut legislation. The Census Bureau is being starved of funds, and even the F.B.I. has inexplicably cut back on its publicly available crime statistics. It is time to reverse this trend and restore transparency in government. Getting an accurate picture of what Hurricane Maria wrought would be an appropriate first step. 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
10 months ago

The lack of data and/or transparency goes with the banning of commonly-used words and phrases in government budgets. "Evidence-based" and science-based" are no longer allowed. This fits perfectly with a president who ignores or twists every piece of data that displeases him. Our country is in danger from this misinformation.

Advertisement

The latest from america

The tête-à-tête between Paul Krugman and Nancy Pelosi in Manhattan was like a documentary about a once-popular rock band. (Rod Morata/Michael Priest Photography)
Speaking in a deep blue stronghold, the Democratic leader of the House calls for “civility” and cautiously hopes that she will again wield the speaker’s gavel in January.
Brandon SanchezOctober 16, 2018
The lecture provoked no hostile reaction from the students who heard it. But a media firestorm erupted.
John J. ConleyOctober 16, 2018
Though the current synod appears to lack the sort of drama and high-stakes debates of the previous two, the role of conscience appears to be a common thread.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 16, 2018
When Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists on the Olympic podium, their act drew widespread criticism. Now Colin Kaepernick is the face of Nike.
Michael McKinleyOctober 16, 2018