Top New York court rules against physician-assisted suicide

New York State Court of Appeals hears a case. (Wikipedia Commons, via Tracy Collins/Flickr). New York State Court of Appeals hears a case. (Wikipedia Commons, via Tracy Collins/Flickr). 

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York's ban on assisted suicide will stand after the state's highest court on Thursday rejected arguments from terminally ill patients who say they should have the right to seek life-ending drugs from a doctor.

The Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that state lawmakers had a rational reason for passing a ban on assisted suicide and that the ban doesn't violate the state constitution.

Advertisement

The case was brought by three people with terminal illnesses. Two have since died. The plaintiffs had argued that the state's existing ban on assisting a suicide shouldn't apply to those seeking merciful ends to incurable illnesses.

The court disagreed, noting that while state law allows terminally ill patients to decline life-sustaining medical assistance, it does not allow anyone to assist in ending patients' lives.

"The assisted suicide statutes apply to anyone who assists an attempted or completed suicide," the court wrote in its unanimous decision. "There are no exceptions."

The decision disappointed groups that have long pushed, unsuccessfully, for legislation that would permit physician-assisted suicide as an option for the terminally ill. They'll try again in January when lawmakers reconvene in Albany.

"We will continue to fight to establish the right to aid in dying in the New York State legislature," said Laurie Leonard, executive director of the group End of Life Choices New York. "So that we can join the six other states and the District of Columbia in which aid in dying is legal."

Critics of proposals to allow physician-assisted suicide were pleased with the ruling.

"The decision is a significant victory for those who would be most at risk of abuse and most susceptible to pressure to take their own lives, including the isolated elderly, persons with disabilities and those who are depressed and overcome with hopelessness," said Kathleen Gallagher of the New York State Catholic Conference.

The bill before lawmakers would allow someone with a terminal illness to request life-ending medication from a physician. Two physicians would have to certify that the patient has a terminal condition and is mentally competent to make the decision. It did not receive a vote last session.

Colorado, Washington, Vermont, California, Oregon and the District of Columbia have laws allowing people to request life-ending medication from physicians. In Montana, a 2009 state Supreme Court decision shielded doctors from prosecution if they help terminally ill patients die.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

The tête-à-tête between Paul Krugman and Nancy Pelosi in Manhattan was like a documentary about a once-popular rock band. (Rod Morata/Michael Priest Photography)
Speaking in a deep blue stronghold, the Democratic leader of the House calls for “civility” and cautiously hopes that she will again wield the speaker’s gavel in January.
Brandon SanchezOctober 16, 2018
The lecture provoked no hostile reaction from the students who heard it. But a media firestorm erupted.
John J. ConleyOctober 16, 2018
Though the current synod appears to lack the sort of drama and high-stakes debates of the previous two, the role of conscience appears to be a common thread.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 16, 2018
When Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists on the Olympic podium, their act drew widespread criticism. Now Colin Kaepernick is the face of Nike.
Michael McKinleyOctober 16, 2018