Who's afraid of Donald Trump? In Mexico, a lot of people

A series of recent polls show the extent of fear and pessimism emerging in Mexico as the inauguration of Donald J. Trump becomes imminent. Sixty-five percent of Mexicans fear a Trump administration will be somewhat to very harmful to U.S.-Mexico relations (36 percent “very”; 29 percent “somewhat”). Another poll shows 72 percent of all Mexicans 18 and older believe Mexico will face harder times after Mr. Trump’s inauguration.

Behind such perceptions of future U.S.-Mexico relations are echoes of Mr. Trump’s speeches bashing Mexico during his campaign for the Republican nomination and as a GOP presidential candidate. His comments in Mexico City at the Los Pinos presidential manor during his impromptu meet-and-greet in August with President Enrique Peña Nieto did not help.


Servando Ortoll, a professor at the Baja California Autonomous University at Mexicali (and a graduate of New York’s Columbia University), believes much of Mr. Trump’s rhetoric is just that. However, he is worried all the same about the impact of Trump talk on the attitudes of U.S. citizens of the border region.

He sees a risk of people there becoming more aggressive toward non-residents. “I expect life to become more difficult for migrants in terms of their daily lives,” he said. “For Mexicans, [a Trump administration] will mean a constant fear of worsening economic and political conditions.”

The gloom has only been deepened by some of Mr. Trump’s cabinet appointments and by the sense that, however Mr. Trump may affect conditions in Mexico, the Mexican government already lacks the ability to address the country’s main issues. Most polls on Mr. Peña Nieto’s performance give him less than 30 percent approval ratings, the lowest of his term and the lowest since the late 1980s.

Ethel Betancourt, a licensed psychologist with a private practice in Mexico City, reports that her patients are already talking about the financial implications of Mr. Trump’s victory. The Mexican peso has lost almost a quarter of its value since September, with no sign of relief in the horizon. Her clients and students “talk about their fears, their worries about Trump; some of my clients think Trump is a madman, spreading fear and distrust in us Mexicans.” Although she declares herself unable to figure out where the character created by the campaign’s political marketing ends and the real person begins, she dismisses Mr. Trump as an “arrogant, conceited, impulsive showman.”
“I do not think he is good for the U.S.-Mexico relations because he is more of an entrepreneur and a product of commercial TV than a politician.”

In Mexico Mr. Peña Nieto’s promises of economic improvement have been shattered by the abrupt fall of oil prices. Now the foundational tenets of Mexico’s economic reforms, pushed since the late 1980s, are being challenged by frustrated Mexicans. Since the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994, Mexico has signed 11 other free trade agreements. Some improvements over the last 22 years, such as suppressing most monopolies, have been accomplished, but poverty rates remain stubbornly high since the 1990s. Violence throughout the country is rampant and shows no signs of letting up, while two out of three Mexicans work outside the formal economy in the gray or black markets.

Moreover, perception of corruption runs deep. Transparency International ranks Mexico a seven out of a possible 10 in their 2011 Bribe Payers Index, and even if most Mexicans still favor NAFTA and friendly relations with the United States, another recent poll found that 31 percent of Mexicans think NAFTA has hurt the average Mexican, while 68 percent think U.S. consumers have benefited from the agreement. Forty-eight percent of Mexicans think NAFTA should be reformed—as does Mr. Trump. Of course he believes NAFTA has been unfair to U.S. workers. 

Aurora Loyo, a sociologist and researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico sees in Mr. Trump a hatred of Mexican people “reminiscent of Hitler’s hatred of Jews” and “an attempt to humiliate Mexico.” On her Twitter account on Nov. 10, she wrote: “my non-exclusive but very emotional nationalism is coming alive again thanks to Trump.” As many in Mexico note, Dr. Loyo believes the frailty of the Mexican peso in the aftermath of Mr. Trump’s victory indicates “how weak and dependent Mexico is.”

One measure of that economic dependency on the United States can be tracked to a staple of the Mexican diet: corn tortilla. The average Mexican eats almost 200 pounds of corn tortilla each year. Now almost half of the corn used in Mexico in the last five years comes from the United States. In 1990, before the North American Free Trade Agreement came into effect, Mexico imported less than than 10 percent of its corn from the United States.   

The perception of the potential damage that Mexico will face from a Trump presidency is shared across Latin America. Alicia Bárcena, the United Nations’ Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, was quick to point out at a press conference in Santiago, Chile, on Dec. 14 that Mexico is at risk of falling in an economic depression if Mr. Trump follows through on his campaign threats to scrap NAFTA. Two days later, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, similarly noting the potential impact of the Trump administration, adjusted its forecast of Mexican GDP growth for 2017 from 2.6 to 2.2 percent. Absorbing thousands of deported former residents and losing critical remittances from workers in the United States to family back home in Mexico are also significant economic worries.

Manuel Gómez Granados, the former head of Cáritas México, sees Mr. Trump’s presidency as a challenge and an opportunity: “On the one hand, Mexico must reaffirm its sovereignty in the face of Mr. Trump’s threats.” But the incoming administration could lead Mexico “to rethink the role of the local markets.”

He also finds challenges and opportunities for the Catholic Church. “It needs to find new ways to help and defend the human rights of migrants on both sides of the Rio Grande,” he says.

Rodolfo Soriano-Núñezis a sociologist and journalist living in Mexico City. Follow him on Twitter: @rsnunez.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cosgrove
1 year 5 months ago
Right now there is renewed confidence in the future in the US because of the Trump election (I know the news is all about the despair of many on the left but that is not the general attitude.) People are expecting better times. There is no guarantee that this will happen but economic and regulatory reforms are a major piece of what the first 100 days are about. This hopefully will produce increased economic growth. But we will see. If the economic growth in fact happens, then this will have an effect on many other countries of which Mexico and Canada are the closest to the US. They will share in this growth. The one problem is that Trump has backed protectionist policies in trade during his campaign. This has a tendency to lower economic growth as other countries retaliate. I have a personal story which is relevant to Mexico. We used to go to Mexico every other year to a time share we purchased. About 6 years ago just after we left, there was a story of a bus of Americans that were kidnapped for money. We haven't gone back since. Our image of Mexico whether real or not is that it has become unsafer. It was a fun place to go and we enjoyed each visit but we are a little unsure just how safe it is now. The people were great. It is especially cheap now that the Peso is about 20 to the dollar. When we first went it was 11 to the dollar. Just one final thought. Why are Mexicans coming to the US? It is for better wages. This should point the Mexicans towards policies that would encourage economic growth in their own country and not have hundreds of thousands of them risking their lives to get here. What are the gringos doing right that Mexico is not?
Beth Cioffoletti
1 year 5 months ago
Being a fairly typical liberal, within the liberal bubble, I tend to resonate with this article. But I also see a lot of optimism for Trump from his supporters. The stock market is up. Running America like a business is supposed to be a good idea, generating profits for the 1%, jobs for the middle class. Though I am wary of a society built primarily around the quest for "profits", I'm in a wait and see mode. Much of Trump's banter and style - picking Cabinet members and advisors based on "looks" - is unfamiliar and disconcerting. America has been milking the world for "profits" for years. The most distressing paragraph in this article is the one about 90% of the corn for the Mexican tortilla coming from the USA. Even before Trump, the cards were stacked against the Mexicans in favor of U.S. profit. Trump exaggerates this wrong many times over. Make America Great Again (now #MAGA) and America First, is America with a big stick, the world's bully. When the world is such a place that there is dominance and opportunity in one area, and oppression and desolation in another, it is only natural that people will move to where they can survive. The notion that America is somehow smarter at business/government than Mexico is absurd.


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

“Hereditary” is a tense and deeply sad horror film that asks incisive questions—and then makes the mistake of giving answers.
Eve TushnetJune 15, 2018
This week, we talk to Catholic comedian, Jeremy McLellan.
Olga SeguraJune 15, 2018
A 1940 photo shows indigenous students and a nun in a girls' classroom at Cross Lake Indian Residential School in Manitoba. (CNS photo/Library and Archives Canada, Reuters) 
Canada has begun truth-seeking and reconciliation, and the Sisters of Charity in Nova Scotia are confronting their order’s role in a racist educational system.
Eileen MarkeyJune 14, 2018