Jesus was not white. Here’s why we should stop pretending he was.

Photos: Unsplash/Collage: Angelo Jesus Canta

Many have asked me in the last few days what I think about the (legitimate) critiques of the ubiquity of White Jesus representations, like the famous painting, “Head of Christ,” by Warner Sallman.

The first thing to say is that Jesus did not look like that. We don’t know what he looked like (the Gospels are silent about that), but we know that he wasn't white. He's known as “Jesus of Nazareth,” after all, which means he came from a small (200-400 person) town in Galilee.

Advertisement

As the Rev. John Meier says in his magisterial series of books, A Marginal Jew, about the historical Jesus, were we to see Jesus today we might be shocked, given the European images we're used to. Just look at men in Galilee today to begin to understand what he might have looked like.

That’s a photo of two friends of mine from Galilee, two cousins, both named Maher. When I pray these days, I imagine Jesus looking much more like them. They’re both great guys, too, which makes it easier to see them as images of Jesus.

Maher
Maher and Maher

[Explore all of Father James Martin, SJ’s articles]

So I think that today Jesus should be portrayed more like he (probably) looked, which is why I use images for my Daily Gospel tweets from innovative sites like “Lumo,” which depict Jesus closer to what he (again, probably) looked like.

[Don’t miss more stories like this one. Sign up for our newsletter.]

Also, images of White Jesus have obviously been used to promote the idea that white is best. And in many representations of Jesus, especially in stained glass, he is not only white, but the purest white—whiter than anyone else. It’s terrible catechesis.

And that has the most terrible effects on people who do not look like that. I'm reminded of Toni Morrison's magnificent novel “The Bluest Eye,” where the young girl believes that whiteness is beautiful.

If Jesus is white and you're not, what does that say about your relationship with him? What does it mean that Christ came for “all,” if you feel left out? Representations of the saints are often just as bad. They're almost always white—even, say, St. Augustine, who hailed from North Africa

That's why I prefer images like those of John Nava, who completed a remarkable series of tapestries for the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels in Los Angeles, where the models for many of the saints were based on people in the neighborhood.

We see the same pattern recurring for Mary. So many images, even contemporary ones, make her look like a suburban American housewife. Which is, frankly, inaccurate. She was Miriam of Nazareth, after all. A poor Galilean woman. (Also, baby Jesus did not have blond hair.)

This pattern is so strong that when I worked with refugees in East Africa, an Ethiopian refugee artist kept bringing me paintings of White Jesus and White Mary, because that's what he had been taught. When I suggested painting Jesus and Mary as black people, he initially balked.

Eventually he brought me beautiful images of Jesus and Mary as Ethiopians. This was all the more surprising since there is a long tradition of exactly those kinds of paintings in his country. But White Jesus was what he had been taught by white priests.

In Jesus, God became human, which means that we have to take Jesus's humanity seriously: he was a first-century Galilean carpenter. What did that look like? Not Warner Sallman's idea. (I'll leave aside what his glorified body looked like after the Resurrection, but it was him.)

Thus, it's essential to remember where Jesus of Nazareth came from and what people from that area look like today and also what they (probably) looked like in the first century. He wasn't white. Neither was Mary nor were the apostles. (Also, they were Jewish.)

But I say more: Images of Jesus need to be inculturated into every culture. Because God came not simply as a Galilean but as a human being. That's why I love seeing images of Jesus in every culture and in every hue. Like the beautiful “Jesus Mafa” series.

Or Janet McKenzie's well known “Jesus of the People.”

Or one of my favorite images, the Crucifixion scene at Hekima College in Nairobi, Kenya, by Englebert Mveng, S.J., before which I prayed many times.

Do I think we should “cancel” White Jesus? If that means destroy images, no. I don't like the idea of destroying images of Christ. Instead, we should promote images of Jesus as inculturated into the cultures in which he now lives. After all, he is risen and is found everywhere.

That also means that we should have Black Jesus in white churches, as a reminder of who Jesus was, and is, today. Because Jesus is best found in people that are outside your comfort zone. Remember: In Jesus's Parable of the Good Samaritan, it's the “other guy” that helps out.

But even more important than the pictorial images of Jesus we use (which are important to be sure) is seeing Christ alive in every person. Especially those who are on the margins, those who are persecuted or those who are victimized in any way. Christ lives in them.

So in short, I would argue for more accurate images of Jesus as he probably appeared and more images of Jesus in every culture. But, more importantly, more efforts to find Christ in every person. Because each of us is an image of him.

As Gerard Manley Hopkins, S.J., wrote,

For Christ plays in ten thousand places,
Lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his.”

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Due to his unrelenting defense of the indigenous population and peasants struggling for land ownership, Bishop Casaldaliga was seen as an enemy by land barons, miners and loggers.
These would be the “first priests of the pandemic generation,” Archbishop Jose H. Gomez of Los Angeles said during a socially distanced gathering outside the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels.
A protester holds a sign outside the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27, 2019, after the court ruled against adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census. (CNS photo/Carlos Barria, Reuters) 
The Covid-19 pandemic and skepticism of the federal government are forcing Latino leaders to get creative in promoting this year's census, reports J.D. Long-García.
J.D. Long-GarcíaAugust 10, 2020
(iStock/SDI Productions)
A federal court recently ruled that access to a “foundational level of literacy” is a basic right. That could spur new reforms to public education, as well as new school-choice options.
Joseph J. DunnAugust 10, 2020