Bishops welcome restoration of federal funding to faith-based adoption agencies

In this 2015 file photo, supporters for same-sex marriage wave a flag outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- The Trump administration Nov. 1 announced a proposed rule to allow faith-based adoption and foster care agencies to follow their deeply held religious beliefs and not place children with same-sex couples.

Under the proposal, announced by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, these agencies would not be excluded from certain federally funded programs for adhering to their belief in traditional marriage.

Advertisement

The chairmen of the U.S. bishops' committees on domestic policy, defense of marriage and religious liberty welcomed the move that would overturn an Obama administration rule.

"We commend the administration for acting to change a 2016 regulation that threatened to shut out faith-based social service providers, namely adoption and foster care agencies that respect a child's right to a mother and a father," the bishops said in a Nov. 1 statement.

[Don’t miss the latest news from the church and the world. Sign up for our daily newsletter.]

"To restrict faith-based organizations' work by infringing on religious freedom -- as the 2016 rule threatened to do -- is unfair and serves no one, especially the children in need of these services," they said.

The joined statement was issued by Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Florida, chairman of the Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development; Bishop James D. Conley of Lincoln, Nebraska, chairman of the Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage; and Bishop Robert J. McManus of Worcester, Massachusetts, chairman of the Committee for Religious Liberty.

"We are alarmed and saddened that state and local government agencies in multiple jurisdictions have already succeeded in shutting down Catholic adoption and foster care agencies as a result of their Catholic beliefs," the bishops said.

"At a time when over 400,000 children are in foster care, we need to take steps to increase -- not decrease -- their opportunities to be placed with safe and loving families," they added. "We welcome today's proposed rule modifications and look forward to reviewing and commenting on them further."

The proposed rule comes at a time that the U.S. Supreme Court is considering taking the Fulton v. Philadelphia case, which centers on the city of Philadelphia's decision of March 2018 to stop using the foster program of Catholic Social Services of the Philadelphia Archdiocese because the agency does not place children with same-sex couples.

At issue is whether Philadelphia discriminated against Catholic Social Services by preventing the agency from serving children and families consistent with the agency's religious beliefs.

Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union said the new proposed rule from the Trump administration is outright discrimination against the LGBT community, but in a statement released with the proposal, HHS said it is "committed to fully enforcing the civil rights laws passed by Congress."

"The proposed rule would better align its grants regulations with federal statutes, eliminating regulatory burden, including burden on the free exercise of religion. HHS is affirming that it will comply with all applicable Supreme Court decisions in administering its grants programs," the statement said.

HHS added that the proposal represents the administration's "strong commitment to the rule of law -- the Constitution, federal statutes and Supreme Court decisions. These require that the federal government not infringe on religious freedom in its operation of HHS grant programs and address the impact of regulatory actions on small entities."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Republicans were expecting President Donald Trump to announce Saturday that he is nominating Judge Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Over the past two years, 31 people from the municipality of Tocoa, on the lush north shore of Honduras, have faced criminal prosecution as a result of their opposition to an iron ore mining project in the Botaderos Mount “Carlos Escaleras” National Park.
Jackie McVicarSeptember 25, 2020
This nomination battle will be as contentious as any in history because it is the final payoff of the gamble large parts of the pro-life movement made in supporting Mr. Trump.
The EditorsSeptember 25, 2020
The toxic relationship between the F.B.I. and Martin Luther King Jr. is the subject of the highly-anticipated documentary “MLK/FBI.”
Ryan Di CorpoSeptember 25, 2020