The editors on Marian Anderson’s exclusion from Constitution Hall

Marian Anderson performing at the Lincoln Memorial on April 9, 1939 (Wikimedia Commons).

Eighty years ago yesterday, April 9, 1939, Marian Anderson performed on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. That year, organizers at nearby Howard University who hosted her for an annual concert had tried to rent Constitution Hall, which was the largest auditorium in the area at the time. The Daughters of the American Revolution, a women’s group of descendants of Revolutionary War participants, owned the hall, and the all-white group refused to rent the facility to the concert organizers. 

First lady Eleanor Roosevelt resigned her membership in the Daughters of the American Revolution, and arranged for Marian Anderson to sing at the Lincoln Memorial instead. An audience of 75,000 showed up, with millions more listening on the radio.


When it was first announced that Marian Anderson would not be allowed to perform at Constitution Hall, the editors of America weighed in with this “Current Comment” from the March 11, 1939, issue.

By many competent authorities Marian Anderson is judged the greatest of all living concert singers. Rising tides of protest from individuals and organizations against the action of the Daughters of the American Revolution in excluding her, on purely racial grounds, from Constitution Hall in Washington, D.C., should be seriously considered by those who have the cause of true Americanism at heart.

The question at issue is not the legal matter of whether the D.A.R., as a private corporation, possess a right before the existing law to practise such an exclusion. It is much deeper, touching the consistency of such action with the actual profession of the Daughters and of the patriotic groups who naturally look to them for leadership. American democracy is based upon the conviction that each individual in our Republic is to be judged, for better or worse, as an individual and not as a member of a group. Any contrary philosophy leads logically to collectivism and to the ultimate subversion of democratic institutions. It makes no difference whether the exception is made in the name of race, or of national origins, or of religious adherence or of class affiliation. The result is inevitably the same, and in every instance flatly contradicts those principles for which the D.A.R. are supposed to stand.

The first blood shed in the American Revolution was that of a Negro; and if descent from Revolutionary heroes stands for patriotism, it should stand for those principles upon which patriotism is founded. True patriotism rests not on words and lineage but on deeds.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.


The latest from america

A Honduran asylum seeker released from detention holds her son while waiting at a bus depot in McAllen, Texas, on May 19. (CNS photo/Loren Elliott, Reuters)
Federal officials are releasing thousands of asylum seekers in Texas. A Catholic Charities facility is taking up the challenge of providing temporary food and shelter after grueling journeys.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 24, 2019
Mena Massoud and Naomi Scott in ‘Aladdin.’ (CNS photo/Disney)
There was a moment during “Aladdin” when I thought, “This would have made a terrific animated movie.”
John AndersonMay 24, 2019
Responses to 10 of the principal objections that are commonly raised against the Catholic Church's teaching on the ordination of women.
Avery DullesMay 24, 2019
Part of embracing resurrection and new life is embracing it not only in Jesus, not only in yourself, but in those around you.
James Martin, S.J.May 24, 2019