Federal appeals court now says Florida Latin cross can stay

A federal appeals court ruled Feb. 19, 2020, that this World War II-era cross can remain standing in Pensacola, Fla. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the 34- foot Latin cross does not violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, based on a similar ruling last year by the Supreme Court on a Maryland cross. (CNS photo/Becket) 

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- Reversing its previous decision, a federal appeals court ruled Feb. 19 that a World War II-era cross can remain standing in a park in Pensacola, Florida, based on the Supreme Court's decision last year about a similar cross on public property in Maryland.

The 11th U.S.Circuit Court of Appeals said Florida's 34-foot Latin cross does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.


Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, writing for the three-judge panel, said the cross "has evolved into a neutral" symbol.

Becket, a nonprofit religious liberty law firm that represented Pensacola in this case, argued that the cross, built in 1941, had become "a significant symbol for the Pensacola community."

[Don’t miss the latest news from the church and the world. Sign up for our daily newsletter.]

In 2018, the same appeals court upheld a lower court ruling that said the cross in the city's Bayview Park had to be removed because it violated the Establishment Clause.

The city took the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was considering a similar dispute involving a peace cross in Bladensburg, Maryland. Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that the Maryland cross did not violate the Establishment Clause. After that ruling, it vacated the appeals-court ruling in the Pensacola case and sent it back for reconsideration.

"The Supreme Court has now made clear that religious symbols are an important part of our nation's history and culture," Luke Goodrich, vice president and senior counsel at Becket, said in a statement.

[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]

The Pensacola cross was built as the U.S. prepared to enter World War II and the park was meant to be a place for the community to unite. The cross, which was initially wooden, was replaced by a concrete version in 1969. The surrounding park has been used for Easter sunrise services, Veteran's Day and Memorial Day programs and other gatherings.

"Pensacola is a city with a rich and diverse history. The Bayview Cross is an important part of that history as a symbol of our community's coming together during a national crisis," said Grover Robinson, mayor of Pensacola. "We are pleased by the court's ruling in this case, and today we celebrate our long-awaited victory and the preservation of the Bayview Cross."

In the Supreme Court's decision last year on the Maryland cross, Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court's ruling that although the cross "has long been a preeminent Christian symbol, its use in the Bladensburg memorial has a special significance" paying tribute to soldiers who died in World War I.

He said this cross should be seen in the same "historical context" as the white crosses marking the overseas graves of soldiers who had lost their lives in that war and that removing the memorial "would be seen by many not as a neutral act but as the manifestation of a hostility toward religion that has no place in our Establishment Clause traditions."

Charlie Russo, director of the University of Dayton's doctoral program in educational leadership and research and a law professor at the University of Dayton School of Law in Ohio, told Catholic News Service at the time that the decision "shakes the Establishment Clause jurisprudence to its very foundation."

"Of course, it remains to be seen what happens in later litigation, but religious symbols may well be OK in public education and elsewhere," saying this ruling could have "an impact on the many cases in schools where religious symbols such as the cross, a creche and student-painted religious murals have been banned."

And just two months after the Supreme Court's decision on the peace cross was issued, a federal appeals court said a Pennsylvania county could keep the image of a cross on its official seal because it was not an endorsement of religion.

The unanimous ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said it was following a precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court with the Maryland cross.

"Courts are not to focus solely on the religious component in challenged government displays; they should consider the overall message conveyed and the broader context in which the display appears," the ruling said.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.


The latest from america

Peter Seewald described Pope Benedict as “extremely frail,” and as saying that while he is mentally sharp, his voice is barely audible.
Italian journalist Eugenio Scalfari, co-founder and former editor of La Repubblica, speaks on Italian television Feb. 1, 2015 (CNS photo/Cristiano Minichiello, AFG). 
The only reports of Mr. Scalfari’s long conversations with Francis have come from the elderly journalist, who does not record or take notes.
Gerard O’ConnellAugust 02, 2020
For young Catholics, puberty can feel like a minefield where one wrong sexually-charged step could have everlasting consequences.
John DoughertyJuly 31, 2020
Brendon Busse, S.J., center, celebrates a Mass at Dolores Mission Church in Los Angeles on June 20 for hospitality workers to view online. (Courtesy Unite Here Local 11)
For many in the hospitality industry, writes J.D. Long-García, the lingering pandemic means no job, unpaid bills and even imminent homelessness.
J.D. Long-GarcíaJuly 31, 2020