Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Catholic News ServiceJanuary 10, 2020
The emblem of India's Supreme Court is seen on a gate of the court in New Delhi Sept. 28, 2018. (CNS photo/Anushree Fadnavis, Reuters)

NEW DELHI (CNS) -- India's Supreme Court has allowed the government to control the appointment of teachers in educational institutions run by religious minorities, a ruling church leaders say violates their right to manage such institutions.

Ucanews.org reported the country's top court upheld a West Bengal state law that allowed a government commission to screen candidates to be appointed as teachers in government-funded madrassas, Muslim religious schools.

"The order definitely will have a bearing in the administration of church-run education institutions, too," said Salesian Father Joseph Manipadam, secretary to the Indian Catholic bishops' office for education and culture.

The Jan. 6 verdict came while deciding on an appeal challenging a provision in the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act 2008, which said the government panel could screen teachers to be appointed to state-aided madrassas. The schools were declared minority education institutions in West Bengal state, just as thousands of Christian schools in the country.

The Indian Constitution allows religious and linguistic minorities to establish and manage educational institutions of their choice to help with the social advancement of their people.

The Catholic Church runs some 54,000 educational institutions in the country, and at least half of them get financial aid from the state.

With this order, "our right to administer our institution is curtailed. Freedom to appoint teachers is also part of the administration," Father Manipadam told ucanews.org Jan. 9.

The provisions were challenged in 2013 before the West Bengal state's Calcutta High Court on the grounds that they violated the rights of minority institutions. The single-judge bench of the High Court allowed the challenge and found the provisions to be unconstitutional.

However, some candidates, selected by the government panel for appointment in madrassas, challenged the order before a higher bench of the state court. It also upheld the single bench's order. The appeal was subsequently filed before the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court said government screening, including the appointment of teachers, is permissible if it is intended to ensure the quality of the minority institution, without interfering with its minority status.

However, the verdict "is a direct interference in the administration of minority aided-education institutions," Father Maria Stephen, a former principal and public relations officer of the Archdiocese of Bhopal, told ucanews.org.

"It will only create problems. The government appoints one or two teachers at such institutions, thereby indirectly taking control of the administration. It will affect the freedom of the minority institutions to enforce discipline and impart quality education," he said.

He said the quality of public schools is not good, so people send their children to minority educational institutions, including state-aided ones.

"Minority education institutions maintain their high standards due to noninterference of the government in their administration," he added.

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

City and state/province, or if outside Canada or the U.S., city and country. 
When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

As we grapple with fragmentation, political polarization and rising distrust in institutions, a national embrace of volunteerism could go a long way toward healing what ails us as a society.
Kerry A. RobinsonApril 18, 2024
I forget—did God make death?
Renee EmersonApril 18, 2024
you discovered heaven spread to the edges of a max lucado picture book
Brooke StanishApril 18, 2024
The joys and challenges of a new child stretched me in ways I couldn’t have imagined.
Jessica Mannen KimmetApril 18, 2024