Bishop Vasquez: Migrant children will suffer most under new Trump detention rule

Asylum-seekers in Hidalgo, Texas, turn themselves over to U.S. Border Patrol officers Aug. 23, 2019. (CNS photo/Loren Elliott, Reuters)

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' migration committee said Aug. 23 sees "heartbreaking consequences for immigrant children" in a final rule issued by the Trump administration that allows the federal government to hold immigrant children in family detention indefinitely.

The new rule was issued jointly by the Departments of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services that will end a long-standing legal agreement put in place in 1997-- known as the Flores Settlement Agreement -- to ensure the safety and care of children in immigration detention settings.

Advertisement

Pope Francis has deemed immigrant children "the most vulnerable group' among migrants," and they will be most affected by this new rule, said Bishop Joe S. Vasquez of Austin, Texas, who is chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Migration.

(This) is an attempt by the administration to circumvent existing obligations and undermine critical protections for these children," the bishop said in a statement. "This rule will jeopardize the well-being and humane treatment of immigrant children in federal custody and will result in children suffering long-lasting consequences of being held for prolonged periods in family detention."

[Don’t miss the latest news from the church and the world. Sign up for our daily newsletter.]

"We oppose this rule that we believe is unlawful and inhumane. Countless children will be harmed by this new rule and this is simply not acceptable," he said.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops also opposed this rule when it was initially proposed by DHS and HHS by submitting comments Oct. 23, 2018, detailing concerns with the rule and urging it be rescinded. The government received more than 98,000 comments in response to the proposed rule-making.

The Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc. said it likewise submitted comments, calling the proposed rule "unlawful and immoral" as it negates "the child-friendly provisions in the Flores agreement."

Said Anna Gallagher, CLINIC's executive director: "This rule would destroy long-term child protection standards created by our government and the courts. There is no justification to keep families and children in immigration jails longer. Separation of children from their parents is inherently wrong. The same is true for keeping children in detention."

[Want to discuss politics with other America readers? Join our Facebook discussion group, moderated by America’s writers and editors.]

"Once again, the Trump administration is using children as pawns in its attack on immigrants," said Lawrence E. Couch, Director of the National Advocacy Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd.

Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan of the Department of Homeland Security said the new guidelines would help the government maintain the "integrity of the immigration system."

"The facilities that we will be using to temporarily house families under this rule are appropriately, fundamentally different than the facilities where migrants are processed following apprehension or encounter at the border," McAleenan said in announcing the rule.

Currently, there are only three family immigration detention facilities in the U.S., one in Karnes City, Texas, one in Dilley, Texas, and another in Leesport, Pennsylvania, which together have 3,335 beds, according to the USCCB's Migration and Refugee Services.

The Flores Settlement Agreement has protected children in immigration custody by guaranteeing them the least restrictive setting. Courts have interpreted this rule to limit family detention to a maximum of 20 days in facilities that are not state licensed to provide child care. Opponents of the Trump administration's rule say it will allow the government to keep families in detention indefinitely.

According to a CLINIC news release, Flores "not only spells out the time period children can be kept in detention, but also mandates the type of conditions facilities must provide, including sanitary, temperature-controlled conditions, as well as access to water, food, medical assistance, ventilation, adequate supervision and contact with family members.

The rule must be approved by the Flores court before the settlement can be dissolved and the rule implemented, CLINIC said.

Judge Dolly Gee, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, oversees the Flores case. The plaintiffs in the Flores case have one week following publication of the final regulations to brief the court on whether the regulations comply with the Flores settlement. If the judge rules in the government’s favor, the new rules would go into effect in 60 days.

Among others who condemned the administration's new rule were Sisters of Mercy of the Americas, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service and Franciscan Action Network, whose executive director, Patrick Carolan, said: "The Trump administration continues its war against migrant children and families. ... This latest attack is cruel, inhumane, and un-American."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
JR Cosgrove
10 months 2 weeks ago

I believe they can leave at any time. They just cannot leave and enter the United States. So the ones encouraging them to stay are to blame. It’s like someone knocking on your door and demanding to live in your house and then after you agree to feed and shelter them, they start complaining about the accommodations.

If anyone in the Church really wants to eliminate poverty and what can possibly do that, they are going about it in the wrong way.

arthur mccaffrey
10 months 2 weeks ago

not a word about the responsibility of the parents of these children who bring them on a long hazardous journey without a guarantee of success. Not to mention that RCC has encouraged these peasants to have very large families which they cannot support-- I call that irresponsible!

Jeri Graham
10 months 2 weeks ago

Seems like a good time to donate to CLINIC. Catholics (and others) need to understand that these people are coming to this country out of fear for their and their children's lives. Let us have some compassion.

Alan Johnstone
10 months 2 weeks ago

Prove your assertion.
This is economic migration, not fleeing danger or persecution; those who really are in danger are assessed as such and allowed entry.

Real charity would motivate people to send money to organisations that look after real refugees who are predominantly in Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

Lisa Weber
10 months 2 weeks ago

Jeri - I agree with you. In addition, I am astonished at the heartlessness of so many Americans who claim to be Christian, but their words would never suggest such a belief.

Advertisement

The latest from america

The coronavirus pandemic has both increased the frequency of deaths and constrained our ability to accompany the dying.
Valerie SchultzJuly 07, 2020
A man holds a Confederate flag outside the Statehouse in Columbia, S.C., on July 9, 2015, hours before Gov. Nikki Haley signed a bill to remove the flag from Statehouse grounds. (CNS photo/Jason Miczek, Reuters)
In an-all white suburb of Detroit, waving the Confederate flag at football games was a tradition during the 1970s. Looking back, William Collins Donahue realizes that the practice was not so innocent.
A Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol honor guard folds the retired Mississippi state flag after it was raised over the Capitol grounds one final time in Jackson, Miss., on July 1. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)
As Mississippi puts away the Confederate stars-and-bars, native son Jeremy Zipple, S.J., reflects on the heavy silence around racism that prevailed during his childhood.
Jeremy ZippleJuly 07, 2020
America Media won top awards for best essay, best feature article and best multimedia package series.
America StaffJuly 06, 2020