Iowa House passes measure to ban abortions after 20 weeks

The Iowa House passed a measure to ban abortions after 20 weeks. (Photo via Wikipedia Commons)The Iowa House passed a measure to ban abortions after 20 weeks. (Photo via Wikipedia Commons)

Pro-life supporters are praising the Iowa House of Representatives on passing legislation that bans almost all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

By a vote of 55-41, the ban passed the House on April 5. The legislation also enacted a 72-hour waiting period before an abortion could be performed.

Advertisement

The bill now goes to the GOP-controlled Senate, which earlier approved a similar—but not identical—20-week ban. Once approved by the Iowa Senate, the bill would go to Republican Gov. Terry Branstad, who is expected to sign it.

If it becomes law, Iowa would join 17 other states in banning almost all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. The Iowa bill allows an exemption for the life and health of the mother.

Specifically, the Iowa measure prohibits abortions at 20 weeks post-fertilization. Before an abortion can be performed, it also requires: a 72-hour wait period; an ultrasound; a description of the unborn child; an option for hearing the heartbeat; information on the abortion and options for adoption; information on the child's development; and risk factors related to an abortion. However, the requirements would not be applied to cases of medical emergency.

Republican Rep. Shannon Lundgren, who managed the bill on the House floor, called it an "honor" to be part of the legislation that saves the lives of unborn babies.

"This bill saves babies lives while protecting the life and health of the mother," she said. "I want to thank everyone for their messages of support, prayers and kind words while we passed the most historic piece of pro-life legislation in Iowa's history."

Jenifer Bowen, executive director of Iowa Right to Life, said the vote, after originally receiving bipartisan support in the Senate, was passed along party lines.

"Over the previous two days, debate raged on this bill in the House," she reported. "Republicans stood strong against immense pressure and, frankly, countless personal attacks and insults."

Tom Chapman, executive director of the Iowa Catholic Conference, the public policy arm of the state's Catholic bishops, pointed out one purpose of the bill is to update Iowa state code to reflect advances made in saving the lives of infants.

"Unborn children at 20 weeks post-fertilization—once considered too young to survive—are now doing so at an increasing rate," he said. "An abortion would no longer be performed at or beyond that point unless there is a serious threat to the long-term health or life of the mother."

Chapman expressed concern that Iowa might become a destination for late-term abortion providers without this legislation.

"This session presents a rare opportunity to make changes to abortion law in Iowa," he said, and the newly passed bill "will represent a meaningful gain for women and children."

Bishop R. Walker Nickless of Sioux City called the legislation a "positive step" in the ongoing battle against abortion.

"This is certainly cause for joy in the defense of human life in the womb," he said. "However, we must continue to pray that the scourge of abortion is ultimately lifted from our nation."

The bishop cautioned that despite the victory, abortion—even in the early stages of a pregnancy—remains "the greatest moral evil of our day."

"Without our pro-life witness and efforts, and most especially, our constant, devout prayers, we cannot expect to change the hearts of those who support abortion," he said. "None of us can simply stand silently on this issue. We must continue to speak out in defense of the sanctity of all human life from conception to natural death."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018