Three states will decide whether to continue the momentum against the death penalty

A member of the Abolition Action Committee hangs a sign in front of the Supreme Court in Washington during a 2008 vigil to abolish the death penalty. (CNS photo/Shawn Thew, EPA)

Support for the death penalty has slipped to just below 50 percent, its lowest level in 40 years, according to a recent poll by the Pew Research Center. Further evidence of public attitudes can be expected on Election Day. Archbishop José Gomez of Los Angeles is urging California voters to abolish capital punishment, writing that it deprives the condemned of “the chance to change his heart and make amends.” In Nebraska, voters will decide whether to reinstate the death penalty after it was repealed earlier this year by the legislature; in Oklahoma the question is whether to enshrine its capital punishment law in the state constitution.

Eight states have repealed the death penalty since 2000, but none by popular vote. The last time the death penalty lost at the ballot box was in Arizona in 1916, and it was reinstated two years later. This may be one reason why few national political leaders have joined the movement for repeal. Donald J. Trump notoriously took out newspaper ads in 1989 saying “Bring Back the Death Penalty” to New York after the arrest of five teenagers for the rape of a jogger in Central Park. (They were later exonerated.) Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton continues to support the death penalty, and her running mate, Tim Kaine, answered a question about “balancing” his Catholic faith with public policy by saying he had allowed executions to continue when he was governor of Virginia. Sadly, Mr. Kaine gave no indication that he would work to abolish the death penalty at any level of government.

Advertisement

It is heartening that younger voters in particular are increasingly skeptical that the state has the right to execute human beings. But abolishing the death penalty at the federal level and in the 31 states where it remains is a daunting process that will require continued passion and commitment. The courts and the leaders of the two major political parties cannot be relied upon to advance this cause.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Leonard Villa
1 year 9 months ago
Opposition to the use of the death penalty does not necessarily mean that the person also contests the right of the State to execute guilty human beings after a fair trial, who have committed serious crimes against society. It is not a general right to execute human beings as you assert. Pro-abortion proponents claim a general right to take the lives of pre-born human beings declaring them to be without value, not human, up to the moment of birth. This should engender more angst and horror than the use of the death penalty. Vatican II calls it an "unspeakable crime" along with infanticide. Traditional Catholic teaching asserts and upholds the right of the State to engage in capital punishment.Catechism of the Catholic Church #2267 . However it is without doubt true that papal and recent ecclesiastical statements about the death penalty are against its use. If one were to assert that it is Catholic teaching that the State does not have the right to execute a person guilty of a capital offense as a general principle, this would not be true. That is not Catholic teaching. You need to be more precise in your opposition to the use of the death penalty.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 A photo panel shows Pennsylvania Bishops Ronald W. Gainer of Harrisburg, David A. Zubik of Pittsburgh, Joseph C. Bambera of Scranton, Alfred A. Schlert of Allentown, Edward C. Malesic of Greensburg and Lawrence T. Persico of Erie. The Pennsylvania attorney general released a grand jury report Aug. 14 on a months-long investigation into abuse claims spanning a 70-year period in the six dioceses. (CNS photo/courtesy of the dioceses)
The state’s attorney general said that his office’s two-year investigation identified 301 priests who abused children and more than 1,000 victims.
One of the leading novelists of our age on faith, fiction and his distrust of religious institutions.
James T. KeaneAugust 14, 2018
Panel members Ivor Frank and Alexis Jay at a public hearing of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (courtesy of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse)
The new report finds evidence of appalling sexual and physical mistreatment of students as young as 7, as well as a culture of secrecy, at two abbey schools.
David StewartAugust 14, 2018
The Gospel calls on all of us to get past “analysis paralysis,” where direct action is always put off in favor of more research and discernment.
Mary M. McConnahaAugust 14, 2018