Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Jim McDermottApril 27, 2009

The Audit Bureau of Circulations released its spring figures on newspaper circulation for the six months ending March 31, 2009.  And they are scary, particularly for some of the newspapers that are already in trouble.  The Boston Globe daily dropped 13.6%, to 302,638; its Sunday decreased 11.2% to 466, 665.  The Chicago Tribune lost 7.4% of its daily circulation, to 501, 202, while its Sunday circ dropped 4.5% to 858,256.  The San Francisco Chronicle showed a lost of 15.7% in its daily, to 312,118; the Philadelphia Inquirer shed 13.7%, to 288,298; and the daily Atlanta Journal-Constitution fell nearly 20%, to 261,828.  The overall average for the 395 newspapers reporting was 7%.  

Speaking last week about the Boston Globe at the New York Times Company shareholders' meeting, chairman Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., expressed his hope that the Globe will not be shut down, as has been promised if the papers' union does not find $20 million in concessions in the next few weeks.  Sulzberger did not go on to expand on this.  

Sulzberger and the future of the Times are also the subject of an in-depth Vanity Fair piece this month.  As much as Sulzberger insists that his job is to "keep the Times on course," author Mark Bowden wonders whether he understands that today "staying on course means turning the ship around."

In the circulations audit, while the Daily News and the New York Post both posted huge losses, 14% and 16% respectively, the New York Times did better than the average, showing a better-than-average 3.5% drop to 1,039,031 for the daily and a mere 1.7% drop in Sunday circ, to 1,451,233. Crosstown rival The Wall Street Journal actually showed a small increase of 0.6% in its daily circ, to 2,082,189.  

Jim McDermott, SJ

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
16 years 1 month ago
It would be a shame to lose any great newspapers; what would be a substitute for them? I have grave doubts that the NY Times and the Boston Globe are any longer great newspapers; in many ways they are becoming like the "National Enquirer" - full of fantasy and worse - full of agendas. My rude awakening was when the Boston Globe touted the sexual-abuse- by-priests issue; and not only claimed old news as new but published as truth untrue stories and calumnies and never made any apologies when the facts were known. And, then the NY Times promoted the war in Iraq while pretending to be objective; just like they are promoting a war with Iran right now by touting any news or source that Iran is "going nuclear" or any other negative Iran opportunity. Not only that, but they are really anti-Catholic and if you notice, any degrading story about the Catholic Church finds it's pages out of proportion to the news value of the incident; and, not only that but any opportunity to oppose the morals of Orthodox Catholicism are seized upon by editors and opinion makers. It is a shame, but Sulzberger has made a bit of a sham of what his great grandfather built.

The latest from america

On June 9, America Media's team of experts hosted an exclusive, subscriber-only event to answer your specific questions about Pope Leo XIV, the conclave and this historic time in our church.
America StaffJune 10, 2025
Walter Brueggemann's influence in the academy reached across denominations and traditions.
James T. KeaneJune 10, 2025
With the Gaza death toll rising and entire families obliterated as Israeli forces seek to strike diminishing numbers of Hamas targets, more impassioned appeals for an end to the violence have come from ecclesial and political leaders from around the world.
Kevin ClarkeJune 10, 2025
Every papal diplomat around the world must let people know that the Catholic Church is always on the side of the marginalized and is ready to face everything “out of love,” Pope Leo XIV said.