Boston Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley worries about Trump catalyzing divisiveness, scapegoating

Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley, seen here addressing a crowd in Poland during World Youth Day, expressed concern about Donald Trump's fiery rhetoric (CNS photo/Jaclyn Lippelmann, Catholic Standard)

While most U.S. bishops have not publicly addressed comments from Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump regarding immigration, a popular U.S. cardinal and adviser to the pope said he is worried about such rhetoric.

Boston Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley directly addressed the issue July 17 when he answered a question by Irish media: "Are you worried about Donald Trump's simplistic solutions at all?"

Advertisement

"I worry about his rhetoric," said the cardinal in response to the question by a reporter during an interview with Raidio Teilifis Eireann. "It's very easy to stir up resentment and to blame groups of people."

The U.S. Catholic bishops, citing the Gospel mandate to "welcome the stranger," have long supported comprehensive immigration reform and a path to citizenship, especially for those immigrants already in the country.

When announcing his candidacy for president June 16, 2015, Trump famously said that the U.S. has become "a dumping ground for everybody else's problems," while referring to immigrants.

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best," he said. "They're sending people that have lots of problems and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they tell us what we're getting."

He added that, "They're sending us, not the right people. It's coming from more than Mexico, it's coming from all over South and Latin America and it's coming probably ... from the Middle East ... and it's gotta stop and it's gotta stop fast."

Shortly after that speech, Bishop Kevin J. Farrell of Dallas, wrote in a July 2015 blog about immigrant bashing of the past, including in the form of nativism, which instills a fear of losing "American values and traditions … by immigrants who were considered inferior mentally and culturally." The Irish-born bishop said that in the past "anti-immigration laws were enacted against the Chinese, Irish, German, Italian and Eastern European immigrants," who "were vilified as sub-human, ne'er-do-wells and drunkards incapable of productive citizenship."

In his recent interview, Cardinal O'Malley, too, recalled how the Irish in the United States were the ones blamed for the economic problems of the country at one point. But the cardinal said that instead of looking and finding blame for a country's problems, "we need to take care of one another."

"We need to be able to work together as a community of nations to deal with the reasons that all of this movement of people takes place," he said. "Very often, wars or economic injustice or oppression, causes people to make the life-changing decision to abandon everything that is familiar to them and go off to another country."

This year, most bishops, while refraining from addressing Trump's words directly, have focused on recognizing the contributions of immigrants or emphasizing Bible teaching about welcoming the stranger.

In Los Angeles, Archbishop Jose H. Gomez celebrated a July 17 Mass for immigrants.

"We pray for immigration reform in our country, for our elected officials and for people all over the world that they open their hearts to the immigrants who come to their countries," Archbishop Gomez said.

Cardinal O'Malley affirmed the call of other bishops in the U.S. to work for "just immigration laws and a way of dealing with immigration that would not dehumanize people."

Immigrants, he said, need to be seen as a resource and not as a burden.

"Countries have to learn to see them that way," he told Irish media.

And in that sense, the U.S. has an easier task before it than Europe. Europe, he said, has a greater challenge because often people's identity has been a shared history, a shared ethnicity, a shared religion.

"We've never had that in the United States. We've always had a collection of people from all over, every language, every religion, every race. But this is what the mission of the church must be: to bring people together to help recognize that we are all brothers and sisters in the Lord."

In the document "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship," the U.S. bishops say that "the Gospel mandate to 'welcome the stranger' requires Catholics to care for and stand with newcomers, authorized and unauthorized, including unaccompanied immigrant children, refugees and asylum-seekers, those unnecessarily detained, and victims of human trafficking."

It says that while nations have a right to control their borders and maintain rule of law, that must be "pursued in a just and humane manner."

"Comprehensive reform is urgently necessary to fix a broken immigration system," the document says "and should include a broad and fair legalization program with a path to citizenship; a work program with worker protections and just wages; family reunification policies; access to legal protections, which include due process procedures; refuge for those fleeing persecution and violence; and policies to address the root causes of migration."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Kathryn Holland
1 year 9 months ago
It is disappointing to read Cdl O'Malley's comments on one candidate, one issue, with so much misinformation, which may lead to the promotion of the opponent and her pro-abortion agenda. I will pray for his Holy and Immortal soul as he stands on the wrong side of the border praying for desperate people crossing the border. When he does make a statement on the saving of children, I look forward to reading it here. Until then, I look forward to your editorial on Hillary Clinton's declaration to preserve abortion and her Planned Parenthood driven agenda. With all respect, Katie Holland Silver Spring, Maryland
Vincent Gaglione
1 year 9 months ago
I would ask Ms. Holland this simple question: “Are you anti-abortion or pro-life?” If you are anti-abortion, that does not make you pro-life. Pro-life is a much more difficult position to assume. It means that in every kind of instance where lives are threatened, abused, persecuted, abandoned, mentally or physically challenged, etc., you are willing to advocate for positions that attempt to rectify the situations of those lives. And that means an expenditure of both heart and pockets. Heart?... because there is much effort required – time, energy, advocacy - to persuade fellow citizens that all life – no matter who - is to be respected, honored and supported. Pockets?...because that means a willingness to provide or advocate for the provision of the money – yes, lots of money - and materiel to make sure that every life achieves a respected, honored, and supported situation in which to live. Oh yes, even the undeserving and unwashed poor! I think that’s what Cardinal O’Malley is referring to when he speaks to the issue of immigration reform and care for refugees. I find that to be a very pro-life position. In fact, I do find his rhetoric rather lackluster and weak. I am just pleased that someone in a prominent position in the US Catholic hierarchy had the temerity to address the heinous anti-life Trump rhetoric on this subject. Regarding the rest of the US’s cardinals and archbishops…. well, better left unsaid is that opinion of mine. When you examine Trump’s rhetoric about Muslims, immigrants from the south across the Mexican border, immigrants in general, refugees, and whatever other groups that he has slandered, it adds up to billions of human beings. Is that really a pro-life record for you to vote for… huh?
Chuck Kotlarz
1 year 9 months ago
“Immigrants", he (Cardinal O’Malley) said, "need to be seen as a resource and not as a burden.” Demographics show a correlation between a higher immigrant population and higher median income (over $10,000 higher). http://politicsthatwork.com/graphs/foreign-born-population-median-income
David Begley
1 year 9 months ago
The Irish came here legally. We have millions of here illegally. Big difference. And America has no legal or moral duty to let everyone in the world to move here. And when did we vote on this?
Vincent Gaglione
1 year 9 months ago
Come to any bar, pub, or restaurant on McLean Avenue in Yonkers, NY and you can meet more illegal Irish immigrants than you could ever imagine. Substitute "Irish Catholic" for "Syrian" or "Iraqi" refugees and would you be so quick with rejecting them or booting them out?

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

The news from Ireland and the United States reminds us of Herod, of Pharaoh. What culture betrays its children?
The EditorsMay 26, 2018
A woman religious casts her ballot May 25 in Dublin as Ireland holds a referendum on its law on abortion. Voters went to the polls May 25 to decide whether to liberalize the country's abortion laws. (CNS photo/Alex Fraser, Reuters)
The repeal of Ireland's Eighth Amendment, which guarantees the right to life of the unborn, is passing by a 2-1 margin with most of the votes counted.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies at a House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Tuesday, May 22, 2018, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
The Secretary of Education stirred up controversy when she said it was up to schools to decide if an undocumented student should be reported to authorities.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 25, 2018
Thousands gathered in Dublin May 12 to say "Love Both" and "Vote No" to abortion on demand. They were protesting abortion on demand in the forthcoming referendum May 25. (CNS photo/John McElroy)
“Priests and bishops get verbal abuse by being told, ‘How can you speak for women? You don’t know what it’s like!’”
America StaffMay 25, 2018