Pope would 'never close the door' on talks with Islamic State

Pope Francis said he would "never close the door" on dialogue with the Islamic State in an effort to bring peace to a region of the world suffering from violence and persecution.

He also said that "terrorism" could describe not only the actions of such extremist groups but also those of some national governments using military force unilaterally.

Advertisement

Meeting reporters on Nov. 25 on his return flight from Strasbourg where he addressed the European Parliament and the Council of Europe, Pope Francis said terrorism is a threat the world must take seriously.

Specifically asked if he thought there was even the most remote possibility of dialoguing with terrorists like those from the Islamic State, Pope Francis said, "I never count anything as lost. Never. Never close the door. It's difficult, you could say almost impossible, but the door is always open."

But Pope Francis also told journalists that the threat of terrorism is not the only horror weighing on the world.

"Slavery is a reality inserted in the social fabric today, and has been for some time: slave labor, the trafficking of persons, the sale of children—it's a drama. Let's not close our eyes to this. Slavery is a reality today, the exploitation of persons," he explained.

"But there is another threat, too," he said, the threat of "state terrorism," when tensions rise and an individual nation decides on its own to strike, feeling it has "the right to massacre terrorists and with the terrorists many innocent people fall."

Nations have a right and duty to stop "unjust aggressors," he said, but they must act in concert and in accordance with international law.

A Spanish reporter asked Pope Francis about a man from Granada, Spain, who wrote to the pope about a priest who sexually abused him. The correspondence set off a widespread police investigation, the arrest of three priests and a layman, and the suspension of several priests by the Archdiocese of Granada in November.

The pope said he received the letter. "I read it and I phoned the person and I told him, 'Go to the bishop tomorrow,' and I wrote to the bishop and told him to get to work, conduct an investigation," he said.

Pope Francis said he had read the letter "with great pain, the greatest pain, but the truth is the truth and we must not hide it."

Another journalist asked the pope about his remarks at the Council of Europe that in audiences at the Vatican he has noticed differences between young politicians and their older peers. "They speak with a different music," the pope told reporters. No matter what countries or which political parties they belong, the young seem "to not have fear of going out of their own group to dialogue. They are courageous. And we must imitate this."

"This going out in order to find and dialogue with others—Europe needs this today," he added.

Another reporter told the pope that his remarks at the European Parliament on employment, the dignity of human life and the role of the state in helping citizens made it seem like the pope could be a card-carrying member of the Social Democrat Party.

"I don't want to label myself on one side or another," the pope said, and, besides, "this is the Gospel."

While many reporters and pundits have tried to pigeon-hole the pope's politics, he said, "I have never distanced myself from the social teaching of the church."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Bob Baker
3 years 11 months ago
"He also said that "terrorism" could describe not only the actions of such extremist groups but also those of some national governments using military force unilaterally." It almost seems the pope doesn't want to say anything about ISIS and the Christians they have killed. Why? Because you don't talk about it, doesn't mean it isn't happening.
Robert Lewis
3 years 11 months ago
ISIS calls itself a "state" and, therefore, talking about "state terrorism" is taking them at their word, and talking about them. Do you want him actually to NAME the "state terrorists"? If so, he'll have to call out both Israel and the United States of America.
Bob Baker
3 years 11 months ago
ISIS can call itself whatever it wants but the world knows it for what it is - a terrorist group that was originally funded by the US and others in an attempt to overthrow Syria but who weren't "clever" enough to properly understand who these groups were (not that they understand the region at all). Hamas is heavily sponsored by Qatar and is responsible for the many who died recently. Islamic terrorists across the globe are emboldened by ISIS (to the point that they openly proclaim their allegiance to it). If the US hadn't reacted to what ISIS was doing many more Christians (and others) would have died. The UN still sits on the sideline doing nothing, but there are some countries who have joined the US' effort.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018