Papal Decrees Seek Faster Annulments

INDISSOLUBLE. The sacrament of marriage depicted in St. Isabel Church in Sanibel, Fla.

Pope Francis’ reformed rules for marriage annulment cases, making the process simpler, quicker and less expensive, respond to calls that bishops from around the world have been making since before the 1980 meeting of the Synod of Bishops on the family convoked by St. John Paul II. With the new rules released on Sept. 8, Pope Francis has made important changes to the annulment process, but he did not make it easier for couples to prove a union was not a marriage.

“I think these decrees are another indication of Pope Francis’ pastoral concern and fleshing out that concern with a practical and viable strategy,” the Rev. Kevin McKenna, a canon lawyer who is pastor of the Sacred Heart Cathedral Community in Rochester, N.Y.. told America. “He has not changed the dogmatic and theological principles which underlie the annulment process. He has instead worked to make it less cumbersome and less expensive.”


In two apostolic letters—one for the Latin church and one for eastern-rite churches—Pope Francis removed the requirement that all decrees of nullity must be confirmed by a second panel of judges; he urged dioceses around the world to make the process free or as close to free as possible; and he established a “brief process” by which diocesan bishops can recognize the nullity of a union when both parties agree and have overwhelming proof that their union did not meet at least one of the Catholic Church’s requirements for a sacramental marriage.

“Hopefully tribunal personnel will be reinvigorated in the upcoming Year of Mercy to work with applicants with compassion and to utilize the new procedures as a form of ministry to those who come to them from a difficult domestic situation,” Father McKenna said.

Catholic marriage tribunals do not dissolve marriages, but assess whether or not a valid sacramental marriage was present from the beginning. Catholics whose first unions are declared null—meaning there never was a sacramental marriage—are free to marry in the church and receive the sacraments, including reconciliation and Communion.

The need to reform the annulment process and cut its costs was supported by an overwhelming majority of bishops—about 90 percent—at last year’s meeting of the Synod of Bishops. The U.S. bishops report that most tribunals charge between $200 and $1,000, and the process can take 12 to 18 months. Some go on for years.

James Conn, S.J., professor of the practice of canon law at Boston College, suggested that the pope’s decision to respond to calls to reform the annulment process now has moved the subject off the table for the upcoming synod on family life in October. That should allow synod participants to focus on other problematic challenges related to divorced and remarried Catholics. Although the new rules respond to most bishops’ sense that the annulment process was too cumbersome, they do not resolve the cases of Catholics who want to return to the sacraments after they are divorced and civilly remarried without having received an annulment.

When Cardinal Walter Kasper of Germany, a well-known theologian, former diocesan bishop and Vatican official, suggested to the College of Cardinals in February 2014 the possibility of a “penitential process” that could lead some divorced and civilly remarried Catholics back to the sacraments without an annulment, he insisted it would respond to the needs only of a small portion of divorced and remarried Catholics. Most should seek an annulment, he said.

For those who have little or no chance of proving their initial union was not a sacramental marriage and cannot leave their current partner, the penitential path would—in a reflection of God’s mercy—tolerate their second union and allow them to receive Communion, Cardinal Kasper said. It would not entail denying that their sacramental marriage was indissoluble, and it would not permit them to marry again in the church.

That “penitential path” option is expected to be debated at the world synod of bishops in October.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Mike Evans
3 years 6 months ago
I have advised and advocated on at least two hundred annulments in my ministry in a small parish. The major key to success is to perceive and demonstrate that the marriage "was not made in heaven" from the very earliest stage. This is not so hard as it may seem. The evidence almost leaps out at you when you do an in-depth interview with the applicant. It is the later processing that causes the nail-biting delays at the Tribunal level. I've found it best to not only submit the application and required documents, but to also compose a strong cover letter that outlines clearly the grounds and evidence that will surely help carry the case to completion. The other helpful part of the process is to have an oral discussion with diocesan tribunal folk about the case as soon as they receive it. Unfortunately, our tribunal has not been quite so friendly or solicitous and often corresponds with both the parish and applicant in archaic "churchese". Just changing some of the terms from "criminal" to pastoral ones would help a lot. Of particular concern is the word "sentence" when the annulment is completed. Finally, in a large geographic diocese like ours, it would help immediately for the Tribunal to establish "branch offices" for the convenience and use by applicants. Too many of our foreign born priests do not understand nor support the seeking of annulments. Their reactions to initial applicants can be very chilling.


The latest from america

Sister Bibiana Emenaha
A combination of a rapidly growing population, extreme poverty, unemployment and armed conflict push people to cross Nigeria’s porous borders in search of a better life.
Linus UnahMarch 22, 2019
As we come to grips with a national history of violence, greed and racialized privilege, this fable of noblesse oblige rings hollow.
Brandon SanchezMarch 22, 2019
In "Miracle Workers" Simon Rich balances the surreal with the mundane and anchors fantasy with practicality, providing the perfect stakes for dramatic and comedic tension.
Jake Kring-SchreifelsMarch 22, 2019
Sharon Hogan and Rob Delaney (photo: IMDB)
The hit Amazon show asks: Can we really just be unapologetically ourselves?
Jim McDermottMarch 22, 2019