New Hope After Renewed Ties?

HOMECOMING. After five years of captivity in Cuba, Alan Gross returned on Dec. 17.

Watching a Vatican-brokered diplomatic breakthrough in De-cember that may lead to the normalization of relations between the United States and the island nation of Cuba, Eusebio Mujal-León was hardly a disinterested bystander. A professor at Georgetown University, Mujal-León is the director of a Georgetown research initiative called the Cuba XXI Project. But Mujal-León is also Cuban born; as a child he fled with his family to the United States from Cuba in 1960.

“It is a historic agreement,” he said, “but behind it are deeper problems and issues” that will require much more time and effort to resolve.

Advertisement

The successful conclusion of 18 months of secret negotiations between Cubans and Americans—facilitated by Vatican and Canadian diplomats and spurred on by the dramatic intervention of Pope Francis, who wrote letters to both presidents, Barack Obama and Raúl Castro, encouraging the dialogue—left Mujal-León with “mixed feelings.” The breakthrough was “dramatic, but not as productive as it could have been,” he argues. “I think it’s good news, but I’m a little concerned about whether or not the lives of ordinary Cubans will improve.”

Mujal-León believes President Obama should have pressed harder for a better deal from President Castro, although he notes that the declining health of Alan Gross, an American who was imprisoned for five years in Cuba, may have compelled the conclusion of the negotiation. “The agreement is fundamentally a prisoner swap, with an opening of embassies then a series of executive orders that will make tourism, traveling, investment and the movement of money easier,” Mujal-León said. “All of those things have taken place without any explicit statement by the Cuban government that there will be expanded economic reforms or any kind of political reform.”

“According to Mujal-León, the central hope of the new approach to Cuba is that “increased commerce and trade and tourism will open up Cuba” and that the rising economic tide that should result will improve the living standards of all Cubans. He harbors some concern that hope may be misplaced.

“It underemphasizes the political will and political capacity of the ruling elite in Cuba; I don’t think they are interested in going down that route” toward greater civil expression. Cuba remains “a highly centralized, personalized dictatorship,” even under the relatively more humane oversight of Raúl Castro. Fidel’s younger brother has “muted” some of the most authoritarian impulses of Cuba’s one party, socialist system, and there are now “more spaces for openness, but even under Raúl, Cuba is a place where there are sharply limited political rights.”

Cuba’s political elite “are going to want to try to retain control.” The question that only the future can answer is, will they be successful?

Mujal-León describes himself as unsurprised by the activist role taken by Pope Francis in fostering the dialogue between the United States and Cuba. It is, to him, typical of the greater engagement with world affairs that Francis seems willing to risk.

“He’s a very political pope, and he played a stronger hand than other recent pontiffs might have,” he said. He believes Pope Francis may similarly be willing to take on other vexing challenges in the region, particularly on issues where the Holy See’s intervention can lead to concrete results, like assisting with the final disposition of detainees at Guantánamo Bay.

Other problems where a Vatican role would be welcome, but more problematic for Pope Francis, he suggests, might be in assisting in final talks toward the peaceful resolution of the decades-long civil war in Colombia. Here “deeper levels of distrust and violence” make a papal intervention more hazardous for Pope Francis. One acute problem in Latin America, Mujal-León adds, is also one that would prove the most significant challenge to Pope Francis: addressing Latin America’s spiraling rate of violent crime.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

The U.S. bishops initiated the Encuentro, which means “Encounter,” to better serve the growing Latin American community.
J.D. Long-GarcíaSeptember 21, 2018
The mission’s founder, an energetic Italian Jesuit named Eusebio Francisco Kino, established several missionary locations in what is now Sonora, Mexico, and southern Arizona, including San Xavier del Bac in 1692, near the village of Wa:k.
Gina FrancoSeptember 21, 2018
Pope John Paul II in Poland for World Youth Day 1991. (Wikimedia)
We have been told we are too gay or too female or too mentally ill or too divorced to serve in the church.
Greer HannanSeptember 21, 2018
A second-grade Spanish class at Holy Name of Jesus Catholic School in Henderson, Ky., in March 2018. The school has 33 students registered as Hispanic for the 2018-19 academic year, up three from last year. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
Only about 8 percent of teachers in Catholic schools are Hispanic, compared with 17 percent of students. Low salaries and a weak professional pipeline make it difficult to diversify the teaching staff.
Brandon SanchezSeptember 21, 2018