A Fantasy Ends: Obama’s presidency in Hollywood

Last month saw the debut of “White House Down,” the second “bad guys somehow manage to successfully invade the White House” film of recent months (along with March’s Olympus Has Fallen”). Racking in poor reviews and limited box office, “White House Down” was not what one might call a buena vista—unsurprising, given the fact that the film proposes that eight rejects from “Duck Dynasty” can take the Oval Office. In “Olympus” we’re at least given the benefit of a ground invasion by ticked-off Koreans.

What’s intriguing about both films, however, and a number of other recent efforts, is the rather direct and critical parallels being made to President Obama. Only the George W. Bush era offers a similar sustained analysis of a sitting president, and surprisingly these most recent efforts are far more critical.


Mr. President Goes to Hollywood

Despite standouts like “All the President’s Men,” “Dr. Strangelove” and “The Manchurian Candidate,” our fascination with the president as a film and television character is relatively recent. During the Reagan and Bush I years, beyond a few historical pieces like “The Right Stuff” (1983) and “North and South” (1985, 86), one has to turn to B-films like “The Adventures of Buckaroo Bonzai in the 8th Dimension” just to find mention of a president.  

Then, in 1991, Oliver Stone released his Kennedy-conspiracy thriller “JFK”; a year later Bill Clinton won the White House, and suddenly the genre of presidential stories exploded. Over the course of his eight years there were historical films (“Jefferson in Paris,” “Nixon,” “Amistad,” “Thirteen Days”); science fiction (“Deep Impact,” “Independence Day”); suspense thrillers (“In the Line of Fire,” “Air Force One”); comedy (“Mars Attacks!”, “Dick”); satire (“Primary Colors,” “Wag the Dog”); and above all, idealistic political fairy tales (“Dave,” “The American President,” “The West Wing”).

With its whip-smart president surrounded by the nation’s best and brightest, “The West Wing” was clearly influenced by early perceptions of the Clinton White House. But the show began in 1999, not long after the bloom was off the Clinton rose. And while certain characters—particularly press secretary C. J. Cregg (Allison Janney)—were said to have been drawn from real life figures, Martin Sheen’s Irish Catholic uber-liberal President Jed Bartlet clearly was not.

Bush II: Hollywood (Does Not) Strike Back

It is no secret that the George W. Bush administration was often under fire for the choices he made. Yet much of that critique came via journalists, columnists and politicians. Few Hollywood stories took on Bush directly, with one major exception: for the entirety of George W. Bush’s presidency FOX’s paranoid “24” told nightmarish campfire tales inspired by the attacks on September 11. And from its inception until its end, the show always provided a forum for conversation about (and usually promotion of) the Bush administration’s post-9/11 policies and worldview. Presidents were almost always main characters; indeed, “24” was the first modern program to present an African-American president. As David Palmer, Dennis Haysbert played the straight man to Kiefer Sutherland’s lunatic Groucho, a sober statesman wrestling deeply with the moral dilemmas posed by these new political realities.

Other presidents followed, like Charles Logan, a Shakespeare-lite villain, or Allison Taylor, an anti-torture Republican. None ever functioned as a stand in for Bush himself, and the show never truly critiqued the choices of the Bush Administration.  Time and again, the idealists were brought to admit that in the current state of the world, compromise was inevitable.

The Obama Era

In 2008, Barack Obama was elected on a platform of restoring those very ideals, of insisting that fundamental change was possible. And for most of Obama’s first term Hollywood more or less left the office of the presidency alone. 

But suddenly now the genre has exploded again, with presidents galore (and even a-gore): “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter,” “Lincoln,” “Hyde Park on the Hudson,” “The Dark Knight Rises,” “Iron Man 3,” “Scandal,” “1600 Penn,” “Olympus Has Fallen” and “White House Down” were all released since the start of 2012.

And unlike seemingly any previous era, many of these stories directly reference the sitting president. “Lincoln” is the story of a president from Illinois who struggles to bring together radically opposed points of view to pass the 13th Amendment. ABC’s hit show “Scandal” features a president who is a Rhodes Scholar and a graduate of Harvard Law School. The president in “White House Down” is an African-American academic who believes he can achieve total peace in the Middle East and a complete pullout of U.S. military. “The Dark Knight Rises” involves a violent Occupy Wall Street-type movement that the president is unable to put down. And in “Olympus Has Fallenthe thoughtful African-American Speaker of the House must take the reins after the president is taken hostage.

Even more striking, with the exception of “Lincoln,” these films almost universally present their presidents as ineffectual, naïve, often little more than a patsy. Foxx’s President Sawyer handles a gun as though Foxx is still playing Ray Charles. Morgan Freeman—Hollywood’s go-to actor for gravitas, wisdom and class—likewise is forced to spend “Olympus” wringing his hands, indecisive. You can see Freeman chafing against the script at times, searching for some way of bringing depth or backbone to his character.

Meanwhile on television, ABC’s red-hot “Scandal” stars Tony Goldwyn as President Fitzgerald Thomas Grant III, a romantic idealist so disconnected from political realities he isn’t aware that the election was bought for him by his political-animal staff. (“Scandal” has become known for audacious shark-jumping twists, but its greatest trick is to make audiences ignore the fact that its forceful, smart protagonist is in love with a whiny teenager of a president. I daresay there has never been a characterization of a president as wholeheartedly weak and pathetic as Grant.)

At the end of “White House Down,” Jamie Foxx wins the day and the Middle Eastern countries agree to sign his treaty. But we never really believe that ending, any more than we believed he had a legitimate plan in the first place. Nor do we believe in “Scandal” that Grant is right to stay an idealist, no matter how many times the pragmatic, luminescent Olivia Pope tells us so, or that Morgan Freeman should be president, or that minor character presidents like William Devane in “Dark Knight Rises” or William Sadler in “Iron Man III” have any real idea how to solve the problems of the world. If someone said “Yes we can,” we’d laugh them off the stage.

How many times did Obama allow himself to be outmaneuvered by Republicans uninterested in playing the game by his standards? How well has his political idealism served the nation? For as charismatic and inspirational a figure as he is, it may very well be that his real political legacy will be to convince people that Hillary was right, that spending time trying to overcome our differences with this Congress is nothing but a sucker’s game. Maybe that’s the real story of the NSA scandal, too—that President Obama has learned his lesson. 

When Obama was elected, many hoped for the country of Sorkin and Jimmy Stewart. But the truth is, Sorkin knew he was telling a fairy tale. Perhaps Hollywood has finally realized the same.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Virginia Edman
5 years 8 months ago
President Obama was elected with great optimism and hope. That his presidency failed to achieve all the things he promised is not due to his lack of ability. I have seen the President humiliated and treated with such disrespect that I wondered how he could endure it.. He has been out maneuvered by Republicans whose only goal was to bring him down. One of his Republican opponents, I think it was Senator Mitch McConnell, said as much, and has been working every day to thwart him. I think he is looking a lot like President Lincoln, exhausted by the uphill battle.. I believe that history will show President Obama to be a great president. His foreign policy and his understanding of the world, that came from his unusual background, make him an amazing president. I have watched him closely since he took office, and quite frankly, he has never said or done anything that disappointed me. I know he is trying to bring change, and he will have many achievements behind him when he leaves the White House.
Tim O'Leary
5 years 8 months ago
But, Virginia - Obama has proven to be singularly incompetent in getting things done. He promised his administration would be the most transparent in history and we have a huge NSA and IRS scandal (where his administration targets his political enemies, and spies on his allies); he promised to close Guantanamo day one of his first term (how naïve); he promised to halve the deficit, yet even his own budgets do not get majority democrat support (and the national debt is over 17 Trillion; he vowed to win the "good" Afghan war but will likely pull out after a stalemate; he said he would defend religious freedom and that marriage meant one man and one women, but he reversed himself on both; he lied about the Benghazi murders that resulted in 4 good men dead and he has not pursued the murderers. Since he has been elected, five Al Queda terrorist plots have got to their targets, and his first reaction each time was it was some home-grown libertarian-type group. The Middle-East is a worse basket case than when he took office and he is hated in Egypt even more than the former President. See the July 7 Wash Post article - http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/in-egypt-gripes-about-us-government-are-a-common-theme/2013/07/09/6cf7e44e-e8e6-11e2-818e-aa29e855f3ab_story.html The only legislative achievement that he will be remembered for will be Obamacare (he is on the sidelines on the Immigration discussions) and the major provisions of that law have had to be delayed because they are unworkable. What a mess!
Thomas Farrelly
5 years 8 months ago
The true fantasy was that this obscure nonentity, with a talent for self-promotion and the services of a great speechwriter, would somehow transform the nation into something better. 51% of voters drank this kool-aid, and some of them persist in the fantasy, despite all contrary evidence; notably yellow-dog Democrats, blacks, radical Leftists, a fawning press, and Jesuit editors. He has broken most of his promises, accomplished nothing in foreign policy, and domestically has backed a health-care bill that was written and passed in Congress in the most egregiously partisan way. While it has some appealing features, its future is uncertain, remaining unpopular and mired in implementation difficulties. Obama meantime has proved to be the most bitterly partisan of recent presidents – aloof from Congress,and constantly assailing the motives and character of his critics. His lack of credentials for the White House reflects an unfortunate norm - the election of Presidents with no significant experience to qualify them for the job. He joins Clinton and George W. Bush in that regard.
Vincent Gaitley
5 years 8 months ago
Well, snap! Yes, Obama is an empty suit, more cynical and shallow than the Wizard of Oz. There hasn't been a real president since Ronald Reagan.
Richard Salvucci
5 years 8 months ago
This is all journalism. It's not history and can't be. Like Mao said about the French Revolution, "Too soon to tell." A lot of us expected far too much from this guy. And a lot of Democrats pegged him as some kind of Great Liberal, but it was pretty clear the Left of the Party was going to give him trouble after it got over itself. If we had a Congress in which there was actually some interest in governing (a la Dodd-Frank, where the Republicans played a role even though they never offered an alternative bill), Obama may have gotten more done. As it is, he hasn't done badly--because sooner or later, the Affordable Care Act will begin to operate, no matter how much the Neanderthal coalition wants to kill it, or delay it. The big loss was in not getting the Grand Bargain on the Budget: that would have put us on a sustainable fiscal path, where we are still not--forgive the syntax. I don't know who blew that: Boehner, Obama, or some combination of the above. You can't fix the budget without compromise, and one guy can only compromise so much. Another good financial crash will probably get it done. Tough.
Jim MacGregor
5 years 8 months ago
O-who? We have a president?


The latest from america

“Walk together, work together, love each other.” That is how Pope Francis described the journey of building Christian unity in the 21st century. Michael Rudzena is walking that path as part of the John 17 Movement, an ecumenical group dedicated to responding to the prayer of Jesus that “all who
Ashley McKinlessMarch 22, 2019
For the first time, the inside story of the election of Pope Francis, excerpted from a new book by America's Vatican correspondent.
Gerard O’ConnellMarch 22, 2019
Protracted and opaque processes only reinforce the fear that the church is still more invested in protecting itself than in protecting those who suffer from abuse, the editors write.
The EditorsMarch 21, 2019
Untold hours of dialogue, by both the underground and the registered church have left the church in a better position to navigate the challenges to come.
John A. WorthleyMarch 21, 2019