Bishops Say, Protect the Poor

UNKINDEST CUTS. Budget proposals out of Congress have proposed reductions in spending on social services like this Baltimore Catholic Charities Head Start program in Edgewood, Md.

Catholic advocates are pressing Congress to make the needs of poor and vulnerable people a priority as legislators hammer out a federal spending plan for 2016. They want to prevent trillions of dollars in social services spending from disappearing over the next decade as Congress seeks to balance the federal budget and reduce the nation’s growing debt.

“There are millions of people at stake in these decisions,” said Brian Corbin, senior vice president for social policy at Catholic Charities USA, which has joined with Catholic Relief Services and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in meetings on Capitol Hill. “They all have a name and a face and based on our principle of human dignity, that name and that face and that family, those really are important to making issues of poverty real.”

Advertisement

The legislative push began in February as advocates learned of Republican plans to remake the way social services like Medicaid and food stamps are funded. In meetings with individual members of Congress, Catholic advocates have stressed that the needs of hungry, homeless and unemployed people must be the country’s highest priority.

In a letter to Congress on Feb. 27, the chairmen of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development and the Committee on International Justice and Peace reiterated that a budget is a moral document and that the needs of poor people are utmost despite the economic pressures posed by “future unsustainable deficits.”

The federal budget “cannot rely on disproportionate cuts in essential services to poor persons,” wrote Archbishop Thomas G. Wenski of Miami and Bishop Oscar Cantú of Las Cruces, N.M. “It requires shared sacrifice by all, including raising adequate revenues, eliminating unnecessary military and other spending, and addressing the long-term costs of health insurance and retirement programs fairly.”

As the bishops’ letter was circulating, Representative Tom Price, of Georgia, and Senator Mike Enzi, of Wyoming, both Republican chairpersons of Congress’s respective budget committees, were crafting spending plans that called for balancing the federal budget within a decade, with the goal of tackling the country’s $18 trillion debt.

The House budget, called “A Balanced Budget for a Stronger America,” cuts nearly $5.5 trillion in spending from current projections over the next decade. Specific spending reductions include Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program ($913 billion); Medicare ($148 billion); food stamps ($140 billion); housing, nutrition, job training, elderly services and other discretionary programs ($759 billion); and the repeal of the Affordable Care Act ($2.1 trillion). The Senate plan was less specific, but identified only nonmilitary programs for reductions.

Both budgets call for increases in military spending over the decade, while immediately adding tens of billions of dollars for overseas contingency operations for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Sister Marge Clark, a domestic issues lobbyist at Network, said the needs of poor and vulnerable people were being pushed aside in the budget plans.

“We’re really frustrated because the House leadership is talking about doing good things for the middle class, and yet everything we see them doing is bad for the middle class and particularly bad for those struggling at the margins,” said Sister Clark, a Sister of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Jim Lein
3 years 6 months ago
How can Catholics and other religious people, especially Christians, be for cuts for the needy?
Mike Evans
3 years 6 months ago
Pushed aside? How about deliberately denounced in word and fact? The voices of our bishops and priests are very meek and mild. Are they afraid of scaring away their big (rich, Republican, conservative) donors?

Advertisement

The latest from america

The tête-à-tête between Paul Krugman and Nancy Pelosi in Manhattan was like a documentary about a once-popular rock band. (Rod Morata/Michael Priest Photography)
Speaking in a deep blue stronghold, the Democratic leader of the House calls for “civility” and cautiously hopes that she will again wield the speaker’s gavel in January.
Brandon SanchezOctober 16, 2018
The lecture provoked no hostile reaction from the students who heard it. But a media firestorm erupted.
John J. ConleyOctober 16, 2018
Though the current synod appears to lack the sort of drama and high-stakes debates of the previous two, the role of conscience appears to be a common thread.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 16, 2018
When Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists on the Olympic podium, their act drew widespread criticism. Now Colin Kaepernick is the face of Nike.
Michael McKinleyOctober 16, 2018