Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Maurice Timothy ReidySeptember 10, 2013

One hundred and fifty years ago, the great American artist Winslow Homer traveled with the Army of the Potomac to document a key military campaign in the Civil War. Some of his paintings were recently featured in the exhibit “Civil War and American Art” at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York (see “The Real War,” an online review by Leo J. O’Donovan, S.J.). One struck me not so much for the craftsmanship of the portrait but the quotation that accompanies it.

In “Sharpshooter,” Homer focuses on a lone Union gunman perched in a tree. He is balanced precariously, aiming carefully through the crosshairs of his rifle. His target, presumably a Confederate soldier, is not pictured. The painting, which resides permanently at the Portland Museum of Art, captures in miniature a notable military innovation of the Civil War.

Reflecting later on the picture, Homer expressed horror at the grim duty of the sharpshooter. It “struck me as being as near murder as anything I could think of in connection with the army & I always had a horror of that branch of the service,” he wrote to a friend.

I am sure I am not the only visitor to the Met who thought of predator drones, today’s controversial weapon of choice. In fact, I would bet the curators had drones in mind when they chose that quote from Homer. Drones, too, allow soldiers to execute their targets from a safe distance. The distance, of course, is much greater, measuring in miles, not feet, but the anonymity of the sharpshooter strikes me as very much like the mystery surrounding drone pilots. Both are unknown to their victims, and both bring sudden death.

Today sharpshooters, or snipers, are a mainstay of modern warfare. And the reasons for their ubiquity are clear—aren’t they? Better to kill a dangerous enemy from afar than risk the lives of a platoon of soldiers. The battles of the Civil War saw heavy casualties precisely because men fought the enemy face to face. Modern artillery used in traditional military engagements proved to be a lethal combination. Executing the enemy while hiding in a tree may not have been honorable, but it was better than the alternative.

And yet Homer’s objection lingers. Even with the distance of time, one cannot dismiss his argument. There is something unfair, unnatural about the sharpshooter’s trade. Homer’s art helps clinch his case. In the picture, the sharpshooter sits in an evergreen tree. The contrast between the tranquility of the backdrop and the bringer of death is jarring. Homer captures his subject just before he pulls the trigger. The beauty of nature is evident, but one wonders how long it can survive in a country wrecked by war.

Leaving the Met, I wondered what kind of art drones have inspired. A quick Google search discovered the work of the Pakistani folk artist Mahwish Chisty. Over the last few years she has composed a series of paintings of drones in the Pakistani “truck art” style. (In Pakistan trucks and other vehicles are richly decorated by their owners.) They are disturbingly beautiful, an intricate patchwork of colors and patterns. In “MQ-9/Guardian,” the belly of the drone is decorated in blues and reds, with two haunting eyes at the center. It looks like a god hovering above, mulling the fate of those below.

Critics have called Chisty’s paintings an exercise in re-appropriation. Drones are widely feared in Pakistan, and she makes them more familiar. A foreign agent of death is given a uniquely Pakistani makeover. “I wanted people to think maybe what would happen if these drones were friendlier looking, instead of such hard-edged, metallic war machines,” Chisty said in an interview.

Yet as gorgeous as these paintings are, one cannot easily forget why these drones were created. Beauty and death stand side by side, just as they do in Homer’s painting of the sharpshooter.

In the years of after the Civil War, artists found inspiration in the American West. The wide-open spaces and untouched beauty of places like Yosemite gave people hope that perhaps the United States could experience a rebirth following war’s devastation. A century and a half later, we are at war again, following the first attack on American soil since the Civil War. Yet the chances of another American renewal seem faint. The question posed by Homer persists: Can beauty survive in the midst of calculated destruction?

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
10 years 5 months ago
It “struck me as being as near murder as anything I could think of in connection with the army & I always had a horror of that branch of the service,” wrote Winslow Homer to a friend. This is the essence of all the Armed Forces. The military trains warriors. Warriors intimidate, incapacitate or eradicate enemy warriors. (There may be "collateral damage.") The leaders and commanders may talk of strategies, missions and actions, but whatever the goal, the military can only threaten or provide armed conflict as a response and solution. Jesus said, "Stop, no more of this!" (Lk. 22:51) "The question posed by Homer persists: Can beauty survive in the midst of calculated destruction?" Paz y Bien, Rolando, OFS.
Marie Rehbein
10 years 5 months ago
The drone is the equivalent of the sharp shooter's rifle, perhaps, but the use of the drone to kill a person is only one of many uses it has, while the rifle's only use is to kill. The drone allows for precise targeting -- similar to a sharp shooter in that way -- but the greater precision means less destruction than other methods of attack, the assumption being that something along those lines is necessary. It would be wonderful if these things were not necessary, but it would be foolish to avoid using them in favor of less discriminatory weapons. To answer the concluding question in this article: of course beauty can survive in the midst of calculated destruction; we know this because we have seen that it does this throughout history.
franklin ohlin
10 years 5 months ago
I do not want to appear flippant, but if you want to get down to what is fair, and what is unfair, consider land mines and booby traps, unknown in Homer's time. As Phil Sheridan said, "War is Hell."

The latest from america

Pope Francis gives his blessing at the end of the recitation of the Angelus in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican Feb. 11, 2024. On March 3, he renewed his call for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza while while speaking to the crowd in St. Peter’s Square. (CNS photo/Lola Gomez)
At the noon prayer on Sunday, Pope Francis called for a cease-fire and for “the continuation of negotiations” to bring about the release of hostages taken by Hamas and the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza.
Gerard O’ConnellMarch 03, 2024
Thanks to Jack Serio’s direction and playwright Ruby Thomas’s script, “The Animal Kingdom” falls into the category of a difficult but necessary watch, and the questions we are left with inspire us to think more critically about our mental health and relationships.
Michael O’BrienMarch 01, 2024
A letter criticizing Pope Francis for promoting “ambiguities in matters of faith” and at the same time ruling the Catholic Church with an iron fist, is circulating in the Vatican.
In an exclusive interview with Gerard O’Connell, Archbishop Jorge Ignacio García Cuerva explains why his first three Masses in Buenos Aires were celebrated in a shanty town, prison and cemetery.
Gerard O’ConnellMarch 01, 2024