Of Many Things

Four issues ago (4/11) Rabbi Daniel Polish contributed a heartfelt piece to these pages on Jewish attachment to Israel (“A Spiritual Home: What Christians Should Know About Jewish Identity”). “When Jews visit Israel, its landscape and historical sites speak in more intimate terms,” he wrote. “It is the embodiment of the Jews’ collective past, situating us in our history and evoking its meaning.” Rabbi Polish was eager to explain “Jews’ spiritual attachment to Israel” to America readers because, as he wrote, “To me as a Jew, Christian discussion of Israel seems to exist in the realm of social issues and foreign policy deprived of spiritual significance.”

It is true, as Rabbi Polish wrote, “The two communities stub their toes on a single issue, the State of Israel.” But the problem, I would argue, is not the State of Israel but the policies at certain times of particular governments of Israel as they affect the native Christian communities in the Holy Land. Some of those policies are the same policies that pain Rabbi Polish and many other American Jews. But differences over government policy, when they do exist, should not obscure the spiritual attachment Catholics too have for Israel.


Catholic attachment to the Holy Land, including Israel, differs from that of Jews, for in Christ all lands are holy. All the same, Israel has a special place in the Christian tradition. Christian attachment to the Holy Land, including Israel, it begins with reverence for Jews’ roots in the land together with a commitment to Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people. All the same, we hold a spiritual attachment to the land and its people, both Christian and Jewish. And sadly, Catholic attachment to the native Arab Christians is a stumbling block in our relations with many Jews. Let me begin, at least, to explain those ties.

Like all Christians, through baptism Arab Christians belong to the one body of Christ. We share a profound sacramental bond with them deeper than our distinctive national identities. When something affects them, it affects us. So just as Paul pleaded for the diaspora communities to contribute to the impoverished church in Jerusalem, we are ready to stand by Arab Christians in their need today. The church of Jerusalem, moreover, is the mother church from which the disciples, including Peter, went forth to found new churches around the world. So the churches outside Israel and Palestine owe the Christians of the Holy Land a historical religious debt as well.

As for Jews, so for Christians, the land of Israel is a kind of sacrament. It is, in a phrase, “the Fifth Gospel,” which brings the four written Gospels to life. Blessed John Paul II wrote, it is “that special land...in which the redemption of the human race was accomplished ‘once and for all’...the earthly homeland of Christ who walked about it ‘preaching the gospel of the kingdom and healing every disease and infirmity,’” the land “in which more than any other place the word of God was brought to men” (“Redemptionis Anno,” 1984).

We believe, as Pope John Paul II wrote, that the Holy Land “contains communities of believers full of life, whose presence the peoples of the whole world regard as a sign and source of hope.”

Not just the preservation of the Christian presence in the Holy Land, therefore, but its flourishing is something we long for. For us, the Christian presence must never be reduced to historical traces and empty museums. It is built of living stones, which are the people themselves. Policies that adversely affect the Arab and other Christians in the Holy Land hurt the church as the one body of Christ. When Catholics address issues of Israeli policy, then, it is to keep the Christian presence alive in the land of our redemption.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Albert Hazbun
7 years 5 months ago
Father Drew Christiansen presents a very thoughtful and correct opinion regarding the strong attachment of Catholics to the Holy Land as well as their support to the few remaining descendants of the Original Christians still hanging on in spite of Israel's ethnic cleansing.
As a member of this Christian community, who has emigrated to the US, I would like to point to the good father that we are proud of our Palestinian ethnicity, which he avoids mentioning, but we do acknowledge our Arab heritage.

Albert E Hazbun

7 years 5 months ago
I am grateful to Fr. Christiansen for describing our Catholic stake in the Holy Land historically and spiritually.  My experience trying to bring this awareness to the parish communities I am part of is most often met with hasty silencing on grounds of political correctness and fear of controversy. Tragically, with our country's strong support of Israeli policy and positions most Catholics seem unaware of the grave injustices inflicted on the Palestinians as a whole and the Christian Palestinians most particularly, whose numbers have now been reduced to less than 2% of the population of the land where Jesus walked. I wish that Father's article had added our Catholic tie to the Holy Land where the crucified people of the occupation and the apartheid cry out for our help.  


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018