Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Terrance KleinJanuary 20, 2021
Photo by Zach Vessels on Unsplash

A Reflection for the Third Sunday in Ordinary Time

Readings: Jonah 3:1-5, 10   1 Corinthians 7:29-31   Mark 1:14-20

Ideas are fine, but faces are better. Most of the time you will want a mixture of the two, but if you must prioritize, go with faces. To illustrate, compare two vocation stories. One is driven by a notion. The other comes from an encounter with a face.  

The Prophet Jonah plans to preach conversion to the great city of Nineveh. Scripture tells us that this is a command of God. Accept the notion’s divine origin, but do not neglect its human dimension. We do not know how this perception came to the prophet. Did it arise naturally in Jonah’s thoughts, or did it arrive miraculously?  

Whatever the mode of revelation, while on his way to the city, Jonah could not reconcile his understanding of God’s will with his own convictions about the people of Nineveh. An idea alone, God-sent though it was, seemed feeble in the face of the prophet’s well-established prejudice: The people of Nineveh were not going to listen. They never had. Jonah would need to make his way through a whale before he could surrender his opinions and perceptions to God.  

What is the difference between the disciples and the prophet? Simply, the power of the human face.

Now, a vocation story with a face. St. Mark opens his gospel by telling us that Jesus is the Son of God (1:1). What he does not tell us is how Simon and Andrew—and then James and John—knew that it was the Son of God saying to them, “Come after me, and I will make you fishers of men” (1:17). The evangelist does not clothe the call in anything that we would consider miraculous.  

Indeed, St. Mark will insist that the disciples never fully understand Jesus. They are often confused, even mistaken. Yet they never face a crisis of faith until the arrest and crucifixion of their leader. What is the difference between the disciples and the prophet? Simply, the power of the human face.  

Perhaps the apostles and the Hebrew prophet began in the same spot. A simple notion entered their minds: God stands before me. Or, perhaps better put, God must be within me because I can now see what I could not see before. But here is where they divide: Jonah sees a plan, but the disciples look upon a face.

The disciples were attracted to the very face of Jesus. The more they followed it, the more they trusted it. They were not pursuing ideas, not so much learning notions as they were coming to love and to understand a person.  

The disciples were not pursuing ideas, not so much learning notions as they were coming to love and to understand a person.  

The next time you wonder about the will of God for your life or for our society, try to match your fancies with a face. Ideas alone are sterile. They may be good or bad, fruitful or folly, but they arise within us. They are part of us. They cannot call to us, befriend us or ask us to trust them. Ideas do not expand our own humanity. Only another person can do that. You can befriend a face. You can come to love or even surrender to a person.  

In trying to discern the will of God, always favor faces over your fancies. Ideas are something we impose upon the world. Faces are the way the world calls out to us. God comes to us in the faces of others. 

More from America

More: Scripture

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

City and state/province, or if outside Canada or the U.S., city and country. 
When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.

The latest from america

The Rev. S. J. Adamo wrote over 130 columns for America on "The Press," and seemingly had plenty of fun along the way.
James T. KeaneOctober 03, 2023
The devil will no doubt be a participant in the Synod on Synodality, even if as a non-voting member. Why? Because the synod presents a ripe field for the devil’s mischief. And because the stakes are so high.
Louis J. CameliOctober 03, 2023
Pope Francis’ “yes, and” message to cardinals critical of his papacy is reflective of the synod as a whole.
Colleen DulleOctober 03, 2023
A Reflection for Tuesday of the Twenty-sixth Week in Ordinary Time, by Valerie Schultz
Valerie SchultzOctober 03, 2023