Do school vouchers serve the common good?

(Photo by NeONBRAND on Unsplash)

In answer to the above question, 65 percent of respondents said that school vouchers did not serve the common good. Many of these respondents noted that school vouchers could deprive public schools of funding and resources. “While school vouchers benefit the better students and more affluent students who have parents able to broach the financial gap between the voucher amount and the cost of private school, what becomes of the students with learning problems or who have a history of poor grades, the very students most in need of quality educators?” wrote Maggie Flynn of Florissant, Mo.

“They are left behind in districts that have been summarily stripped of resources and are, in effect, being shut out of education,” said Ms. Flynn. “Tax credits for middle- and low-income parents who choose private schools are fine. But taking away resources from the already sinfully underfunded public school to benefit private schools is wrong on every level.”

Advertisement

Ann Garry of  Bremerton, Wash., said that she worried that the voucher system allowed some students, such as those with learning disabilities, to fall through the cracks. “Non-public schools don’t have to accept any student that comes to them. They are able to take ‘the cream of the crop,’ leaving students who need more help to the public schools. This creates more financial burden on public schools who must accept every child, regardless of ability or behavior, and provide instruction and services on reduced funding but are expected to meet ever-expanding academic expectations.”

Thirty-five percent of respondents said they thought school vouchers served the common good. “I feel parents should be able, no matter their income, to send their children to the school they feel is best,” said Beth Cornelson of Madison, Wis.

Many said that school vouchers promoted choice for families. “Parents can choose the best schools from a range of options, benefiting students and forcing all schools to be more competitive. Those on the margins of affording private school in a bad district won’t have to choose between a home and their children's future,” wrote Brendan Anderson of Hicksville, N.Y.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Andrew Strada
2 months 1 week ago

If vouchers are a bad thing, will Jesuit high schools stop accepting them? Or will they find a jesuitical rationale for having their cake and eating it too?

Peter Schwimer
2 months ago

I would posit that vouchers are in fact a cheap way of pacifying the masses. In most instances of which I am aware they provide insufficient funds to make attendance at private schools "free". And they hide the fact that public education is being decimated. The only folks who actually win is the school district itself. Those who are unable to bridge the gap are left out of the educational system being forced to attend inferior schools with inappropriate resources. The only folks who lose are the kids.
Maybe Jesuits should (God forbid) compromise and accept vouchers as full payment for tuition and fees.

Vince Killoran
2 months ago

School vouchers are corrosive to public education, one of the few remaining civic institutions in our privatized, neoliberal nation.

Advertisement
More: Education

The latest from america

Archbishop Charles Scicluna of Malta arrives in Osorno, Chile, on June 14, beginning a pastoral mission to promote healing in the wake of a clerical sexual abuse crisis. (CNS photo/courtesy of Archdiocese of Santiago)
The pope’s decision gives the Maltese archbishop the lead role in the fight against abuse in the church and in the protection of minors.
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 13, 2018
How do you pray? Do you kneel? Sit? Lie down?
James Martin, S.J.November 12, 2018
“This hypothesis—that the reality of personal sexual misconduct by bishops...was a factor which inclined some bishops not to vigorously pursue allegations of abuse among their clergy—I believe that this is a valid hypothesis.”
Kevin ClarkeNovember 12, 2018
Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, center, leads the opening prayer Nov. 12 during the fall general assembly of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Baltimore. Also pictured are Archbishop Jose H. Gomez of Los Angeles, vice president of the USCCB, and Msgr. J. Brian Bransfield, general secretary. (CNS photo/Bob Roller)
U.S. bishops tell the authors of a groundbreaking new book that they feel a duty to speak out on issues of the day, but they must tread carefully with a secular press and fallout from the sexual abuse crisis.