Do school vouchers serve the common good?

(Photo by NeONBRAND on Unsplash)

In answer to the above question, 65 percent of respondents said that school vouchers did not serve the common good. Many of these respondents noted that school vouchers could deprive public schools of funding and resources. “While school vouchers benefit the better students and more affluent students who have parents able to broach the financial gap between the voucher amount and the cost of private school, what becomes of the students with learning problems or who have a history of poor grades, the very students most in need of quality educators?” wrote Maggie Flynn of Florissant, Mo.

“They are left behind in districts that have been summarily stripped of resources and are, in effect, being shut out of education,” said Ms. Flynn. “Tax credits for middle- and low-income parents who choose private schools are fine. But taking away resources from the already sinfully underfunded public school to benefit private schools is wrong on every level.”

Advertisement

Ann Garry of  Bremerton, Wash., said that she worried that the voucher system allowed some students, such as those with learning disabilities, to fall through the cracks. “Non-public schools don’t have to accept any student that comes to them. They are able to take ‘the cream of the crop,’ leaving students who need more help to the public schools. This creates more financial burden on public schools who must accept every child, regardless of ability or behavior, and provide instruction and services on reduced funding but are expected to meet ever-expanding academic expectations.”

Thirty-five percent of respondents said they thought school vouchers served the common good. “I feel parents should be able, no matter their income, to send their children to the school they feel is best,” said Beth Cornelson of Madison, Wis.

Many said that school vouchers promoted choice for families. “Parents can choose the best schools from a range of options, benefiting students and forcing all schools to be more competitive. Those on the margins of affording private school in a bad district won’t have to choose between a home and their children's future,” wrote Brendan Anderson of Hicksville, N.Y.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Andrew Strada
7 months 1 week ago

If vouchers are a bad thing, will Jesuit high schools stop accepting them? Or will they find a jesuitical rationale for having their cake and eating it too?

Peter Schwimer
7 months 1 week ago

I would posit that vouchers are in fact a cheap way of pacifying the masses. In most instances of which I am aware they provide insufficient funds to make attendance at private schools "free". And they hide the fact that public education is being decimated. The only folks who actually win is the school district itself. Those who are unable to bridge the gap are left out of the educational system being forced to attend inferior schools with inappropriate resources. The only folks who lose are the kids.
Maybe Jesuits should (God forbid) compromise and accept vouchers as full payment for tuition and fees.

Floyd Richardson
7 months 1 week ago

Schools can do a better job and that's a fact. Everyone can improve and we can help them. Maybe if they will teach kids how to write a cv letter at http://kingcameranfoundation.ning.com/profiles/blogs/blogging-with-a-keyword-rich-domain then maybe it will help them to become a better person. Trust me, it will help them.

Vince Killoran
7 months 1 week ago

School vouchers are corrosive to public education, one of the few remaining civic institutions in our privatized, neoliberal nation.

Advertisement
More: Education

The latest from america

Join Kirsten Powers, CNN analyst and USA Today columnist, and Rev. James Martin, S.J., Editor at Large of America Media and New York Times best-selling author, for a live show celebrating the 100th episode of Jesuitical.
America Media EventsApril 24, 2019

Some three months before Neil Armstrong stepped off the ladder of the lunar module and left his footprints upon the surface of the moon in July, 1969, and uttered those immortal words about it being but “one small step for man” and yet “a giant leap for mankind,” a young, brown-haired, freckle-

Joseph McAuleyApril 18, 2019
You give us hope when we’re reporting on challenging issues in the church.
James Cappabianca April 18, 2019
For decades, Lopez has sought to re-establish our ethical relationships with the land and the other creatures who dwell on it. But Lopez, like many authors, struggles against labels.
Vincent J. MillerApril 18, 2019