Gospel: “My kingdom is not from this world”

The political context in which Pope Pius XI, by the encyclical “Quas Primas,” established the feast of Christ the King in 1925 was the still unresolved Roman Question, which concerned the papacy and the Kingdom of Italy regarding the temporal authority of the popes and the Papal States. For those of us who have grown up with the separation of church and state, the Papal States are a distant historical oddity.

Yet, even if these political issues no longer resonate for us today, “Quas Primas” commemorated these same issues and problems by taking the view that marks the church off as a unique society, one that is eternal, whose king’s authority transcends all political divisions and historical epochs. The church exists in the messiness of history and responds to events that emerge from that same messiness but claims a king who transcends it all.

Advertisement

Already in the Book of Daniel and in earlier prophetic books, the hope for the true king, the one who would establish God’s kingdom, emerged in the language and imagery of ancient Near Eastern myth, when the prophet sees “one like a Son of man coming, on the clouds of heaven.” While scholars dispute the identification of the Son of Man as the messiah in Daniel, the earliest Christians understood that the one to whom “was given dominion and glory and kingship, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him” was Jesus, whose “dominion is an everlasting dominion that shall not pass away” and whose “kingship is one that shall never be destroyed.” This was the king of all.

When would this king of all peoples, nations and languages arrive? When would God’s kingdom, the everlasting dominion, be established? The Book of Revelation, written in opposition to the Caesars of Rome and their Empire, declared that Jesus was already “the ruler of the kings of the earth,” who “made us to be a kingdom, priests serving his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever.” And Revelation promised, evoking the language of Daniel, that Jesus’ first coming will be followed by a second coming with the clouds when “every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and on his account all the tribes of the earth will wail.”

Even Jesus’ disciples, though, who followed him faithfully if unsurely to Jerusalem, must have wondered about the answer when they heard the Roman procurator Pilate ask their teacher, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus answered: “My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.” It is a true answer, of course, but also elusive, for though Jesus’ kingdom is “not from this world” and does not involve peace treaties, concordats, armies and diplomatic corps, it includes all of this world and all that is in it.

It is a point Pope Pius XI makes in “Quas Primas” (No. 13), citing Cyril of Alexandria, who wrote that “Christ has dominion over all creatures, a dominion not seized by violence nor usurped, but his by essence and by nature.” Pius XI also writes that though Jesus’ “kingship is founded upon the ineffable hypostatic union,” Christ is also our King “by acquired, as well as by natural right, for he is our Redeemer.” Jesus’ kingship is unlike any other by nature and by behavior.

But there is another consideration as to why Jesus declared that his kingdom was “not from this world.” Pius XI states that all people can enter this kingdom, whoever they are and from wherever they are since “this kingdom is opposed to none other than to that of Satan and to the power of darkness” (No. 15). This kingdom welcomes all kingdoms and all people.

If we see only the messiness of history and politics, we are missing the true story of eternity and the true king of all, who is already “the ruler of the kings of the earth.” If we believe it to be true, we must never despair of the politics of our age, for he came as king, is now king and is coming again in glory.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Richard Booth
2 years 8 months ago
As I reflect on the hierarchical nature of kingship, my mind tends to look upward. To my mind, and to paraphrase the author of a book I recently read, a central key to understanding the work of Jesus was, despite custom and law, inclusion. This insistence on inclusion, called "commensality" by the author, is egalitarian rather than hierarchical. Interestingly, the ecclesiastical architecture of the West tends to spiral upward, while in the East it tends toward horizontalism. The latter seems more reflective of equity and oneness than the former.
Bruce Snowden
2 years 8 months ago
St, Paul said, for those who love God, “all things” not (somethings) work “together” not (separately) unto “good” (godliness.) This is true because God is the “maker of meaning.” Because we are made in the image of God, “Man (also) is a maker of meaning.” What does this mean? It means that through Baptism which makes us kin of and to God, we become with Jesus, priestly, kingly, (queenly) prophetic, the later meaning not so much a foreseer of the future, (that too) but also a teacher, proclaiming the Kingdom of God here and now, as well as the Kingdom yet to come. What a job! I think that’s what the feast of Christ the King is all about.

Advertisement

The latest from america

The task of redemption is Christ’s, not ours. His grace will fulfill the work.
Michael SimoneJuly 13, 2018
The crowd confused the symbol with the reality
Michael SimoneJuly 13, 2018
The feeling Jesus experiences is similar to that of a mother responding to an infant’s hunger or to her child’s cry.
Michael SimoneJune 29, 2018
We recognize unclean spirits today not through the illnesses they cause, but through the minds they enrapture.
Michael SimoneJune 29, 2018