Stephen Colbert, Master Teacher?

A fake news anchor on a channel known for comedy is a greater source of (true) information than news channels with real reporters? Apparently.

For the last few years, many have claimed to get their news from "The Daily Show" and "The Colbert Report," and now there's more evidence to support it.

Advertisement

According to a study performed by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania and published in the journal Mass Communication and Society, Stephen Colbert's "The Colbert Report" might inform as much as it humors. According to Annenberg's press release:

The study, published online in Mass Communication and Society, tested “The Colbert Report” against CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and broadcast nightly news, as well as talk radio and newspapers as sources of political information. The study, “Stephen Colbert’s Civics Lesson,” was based on phone survey data from 1,232 adults 18 years or older who were interviewed between Dec. 13, 2012 and Dec. 23, 2012.
 

Watching “The Colbert Report” served as “an extended civics lesson,” the researchers said. The show not only increased people’s perceptions that they knew more about political financing, but significantly increased their actual knowledge, and did so at a greater rate than other news sources. Other activities that increased knowledge about super PACs and 501(c)(4)s to a lesser degree included reading a daily newspaper, listening to talk radio, and watching Fox News.

I should add that I don't know enough about this study to draw too many conclusions about the superiority of "The Colbert Report" relative to, say, NPR, the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal. I think it's fair to say that, however helpful the "Report" is in educating audiences, a person who watched only Colbert's show to learn about world news wouldn't know as much, or as much in depth, as the reader of the Times or the Journal (assuming the latter reader reads more than a few articles and opinion pieces). Colbert is brilliant, but he is an entertainer first. The satire and the comedy dilute the purity of the information. His show does not provide (and, in fairness to him, does not intend to provide) an objective, varied look at issues. 

However, Colbert finds creative ways to illuminate subjects that people otherwise wouldn't know about or would likely find too boring to spend time on. And Colbert gives air time to people who possess all kinds of perspectives, whether religious, political, philosophical and otherwise. His interviews veer into substantive discussions and highlight important social, cultural, and religious divisions. Put simply, and unlike all other late night talk shows, Colbert engages issues that matter.

Theology teachers, particularly Catholic theology teachers, have known this for some time. A few years ago, in what is still probably my most widely read essay (a piece titled "Colbert's Cloak and Dagger Catechesis," at Patheos.com), I documented the numerous ways that Colbert effectively talks about and teaches major Catholic themes -- everything from Adam and Eve, to the debate over faith and evolution, to the existence of Jesus. (For a more recent treatment of the subject, see Patrick R. Manning's article in America, "Truth and Truthiness.") When it comes to religion in popular media, few resources are as simultaneously edifying and funny as Colbert's show.

Now, with this latest study from Annenberg, it appears Colbert is not simply a talented catechist, but more broadly, a talented teacher. Through skits, interviews, and commentary, and through the filters of humor and satire, people learn -- at least with some subjects. Campaign finance, government, theology . . . but what about Calculus or some other area of advanced mathematics? Forget "Better Know a District"; how about "Better Know a Proof"? Think of the possibilities...

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018