Ends and Beginnings

Since 2007 I have blogged at America Magazine’s “The Good Word” and have enjoyed the practice and habit of blogging immensely. “The Good Word” gave me the freedom to write on the topics and passages on which I saw fit and, significantly, gave me a built in audience, since America Magazine in print has been with us for over a century now. It is this readership which I will miss the most, since I enjoyed the comments, ideas, and good will which was generated at the site by readers. It made “The Good Word” a civilized site, which it remains, and which is sometimes too rare on the web, but which mirrors the purposes of the Bible, to transcend ephemeral differences amongst people and get to the true heart of matters.

At the heart of my interests, naturally, is the Bible. “The Good Word” gave me the occasion to interpret the Bible in connection with the daily and weekly Lectionary readings and in the context of popular culture, music and movies especially, and current Church news and events. I am immensely grateful to Tim Reidy, the online editor, for offering me this opportunity to write for the magazine and I hope that, in some form or another, I will continue to contribute to America Magazine in the future, as Tim and I have discussed. It has come time, though, for me to move on with other projects and these are motivated by my desire to write more directly about my scholarly interests and my personal interests, which intersect in a number of ways. I will be blogging now at www.biblejunkies.com and I would invite you all to come and read my posts there, after you have finished with “The Good Word,” naturally. I think it would be wrong, though, to end my last post with a post simply saying goodbye, without any biblical content or reflection.


Throughout this semester my students, both graduate and undergraduate, and I have been reading Jewish and Christian apocalyptic texts, some of which are canonical and some of which are not. The apocalyptic genre concerns what have been traditionally known as “the last things” and on surface are simply oriented to the future. It is the case, though, that apocalyptic texts have an integral relationship to the time in which they are written and often concern the religious, political and social situations of those Jews and Christians who were suffering persecution, physical or religious, under the thumb of foreign rulers such as Antiochus Epiphanes or Domitian. Apocalyptic texts, then, often consider the past, history to us, which was, of course, the present day experience of the authors of apocalyptic texts and their first hearers and readers, as they hoped and yearned for future salvation.

Christian apocalyptic hopes were transformed in a subtle way, though, by the first coming of Jesus in the incarnation. It is not that these first followers of Jesus did not share the same sort of future yearnings as in other Jewish apocalypses – they certainly did – or that the Christian apocalyptic hopes were not interpreted in light of the present day situation of the authors and first readers, for instance, of the  Apocalypse of John. It is just in the Jewish apocalypses, such as Daniel, 1 Enoch, and 4 Ezra, for example, the hope for the Messiah was not grounded in a historical reality, but in the promises of the age to come and the sufferings of the present age. These hopes and promises are not insignificant, but Christian apocalyptic hopes were grounded additionally in the concrete reality of Jesus’ birth, life, death and resurrection.

This did not mean that ancient Christians were awaiting the “Second Coming” of the Messiah, the Christ, since he had already come once in the incarnation, but more that because of his death, resurrection and ascension he was with them even in the midst of their earthly lives, not only as a hope, but as Lord. This is not past tense, however, as if something experienced only by ancient Christians and apocalyptic seers, but a present reality for Jesus’ followers today. In prayer, in worship, in liturgy, in text, in community, Jesus comes to each of us even now. We share, that is, in the humble triumph of good over evil now, we participate in the heavenly liturgy now, we live in community with the saints now, we dine at the Messianic banquet now. There is good reason, then, to see Jesus’ return, or Parousia, not even as the “Second Coming,” but as the “Third Coming,” following his Incarnation, just celebrated, and his constant communion with and life together with the saints now. This future is present now and because of it we wait with such hope for its fulfillment.

Here is an example. Years ago when I was a teenager, my Great Aunt, who was then in her 90’s, hugged me and said something to me during a rare visit to see her. Rare because old relatives lose their luster to hipster teenagers. Yet, when she spoke to me tears started to stream down my cheeks, which was remarkable because I did not understand what she had said to me. She was one of my “Tantens,” who had come to Canada from the Mennonite communities in Russia late in life, and who had never learned to speak English. My German was in remission in those years, so I asked my Mother what her Aunt had said. My Mom said, “She said, ‘if I don’t see you here on earth again, I’ll see you in heaven.’” I did not see her here on earth again, but I look forward to seeing her again in heaven. I look forward to seeing all of you again, too, here at America, at my new blog, or in heaven. Now, please do not misunderstand: only one of the sites I have just mentioned is most excellent, perfect even, and I do not mean to compare the other sites to it. It's only that even though these earthly sites are less than perfect, all we can do is keep trying and they are the only places you can find me now. See you around.

John W. Martens

Follow me on Twitter @johnwmartens

Join me at my website: http://www.biblejunkies.com/

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Chris Sullivan
6 years 9 months ago
Thanks John for your wonderful scripture blog.

“The Good Word” is a civilized site, no doubt facilitated by your kind, charitable and thoughful input.

May God richly bless you and yours in your future endeavours.

6 years 9 months ago
John, may I third the comments of Chris and Bill.  Your blogs have been a source of learning and inspiration for me.  I know you will be missed by "America" readers, but we can still follow your writings on your own site, and that is a gift, indeed.  Blessings to you and your family.
Bill Collier
6 years 9 months ago
I second Mr. (Ms.?) Sullivan's comments. I've enjoyed your many insights, Prof. Martens, and good luck in your future endeavors. I hope you won't be a stranger to this blog.  
6 years 9 months ago
And may I add my fourth.  Thanks you so much Prof Martens.  I learned a lot from you.
Good Luck on your new venture...projects.  God bless.
C Walter Mattingly
6 years 9 months ago
Best to you. Your students are fortunate to have you.


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018