Los Angeles Increases Its Minimum Wage, But Do We Really Care?

International Workers' Day supporters gather in downtown Los Angeles May 1 to raise awareness about minimum wage and immigration issues.

On Tuesday the city council of Los Angeles voted 14-1 to almost double the minimum wage in the city, from $9 to $15, over the next five years. It’s a decision that will have huge effects on the city, where almost 50 percent of the city’s work force earns less than that amount. Over 800,00 Angelinos could see their salaries go up.

In fighting for the raise, groups like the Economic Roundtable have noted that Los Angeles both has a higher cost of living that Chicago, Dallas, Philadelphia or Seattle; and its median earnings—the midpoint of all salaries—is also far less than those cities.


The Roundtable also notes that 80 percent of low-wage jobs are face to face. The point being, their jobs are not easily cut. (One of the main arguments of the small business community has been that raising the minimum wage means they will have to fire workers.) 

The LA Chamber of Commerce, which opposed the bill, thinks many small businesses will be forced to move outside the city limits or close down completely. Said Ruben Gonzales of the Organization to the LA Times, "It's simple math," Gonzalez said. "There is simply not enough room, enough margin in these businesses to absorb a 50-plus percent increase in labor costs over a short period of time."

It's an interesting dilemma—if businesses do close or move, nobody wins. And at the same time, the idea that any business should be allowed to pay less than a living wage is not right, either. 

And it's not as though minimum wage earners are now set. Someone working full time at the new minimum would earn $600/week, $30,000 a year before taxes. That’s about $6,600 above the federal poverty level—but again, Los Angeles has a higher cost of living than almost anywhere in the country.

Also, according to a 2014 Pew Research Center study 64 percent of Americans who make the minimum wage receive only part time work to begin with. 

Still, there is a way of making this work without small businesses closing or moving or firing employees. Namely, we who live in Los Angeles could agree to pay more for those services.

No business owner in his right mind wants to suggest that, because hey, there's always another Italian restaurant. Every day as consumers, we put value for us far above most things, including the cost of the labor that went into it. Society encourages that way of thinking; it even hides the losers of that game, placing out of view the people who cook our meals, clean our dishes or make these cool products we want, allowing us to isolate our decisions from any sense of consequence.

Where I choose to shop or eat, that doesn't affect anyone. We live, quite happily, in a vacuum. (Which by the way is a fantastic position from which to judge the responsibilities of others. It's the Maui of moral superiority.)

It's great that so many Angelinos are cheering this massive minimum wage increase. It definitely has the potential to help a lot of people. But if we really want that to happen, it's not going to be just because small business owners agree to suck it up. It's not like their profit margins are massive to begin with.

No, at some point we're almost certainly going to have to agree to pay more. 

The possibility of that conversion of heart remains to be seen.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
ed gleason
3 years 8 months ago
The idea that there will be massive layoffs and small businesses will move is ludicrous. Where will all the low paying service industries move? To the Mohave desert? Hotels and McDonald's will build in the Mohave? San Francisco is booming with a quicker $15 minimum wage. A two bedroom in SF is now $4000 a month and these GOP pundents tell us a 25-50 cent increase in a Mac hamburger will destroy western civilization...
Joseph J Dunn
3 years 8 months ago
The Los Angeles city council has launched an experiment--a social and economic experiment. As Jim McDermott notes, there are various possible outcomes. I hope this has the intended favorable outcomes for low-wage workers. Local action is preferable to national laws that cannot adjust to significant differences in local costs of living, labor pools, etc. Local governments can make adjustments as results of the experiment become visible. For one analysis of the new Los Angeles law, and its impact: http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/las-new-minimum-wage-isnt-worth-anywhere-close-to-15/
Martin Eble
3 years 8 months ago
Ann Phillips
3 years 7 months ago
Thank you, Martin Eble. The numbers point to the hard truth.
John Walton
3 years 7 months ago
Welcome the new tax payers with open arms. I wonder if City Council figured this -- as a full time minimum wage worker goes from $18k to $30k their California marginal tax rate doubles from 2% to 4%, their Federal marginal tax rate goes from 10% to 15% -- a "high class problem". They probably no longer qualify for Medi-CAL under the earned income thresh-hold...means that they get to purchase one of those Bronze Obamacare health plans with the $5,000 deductible. I hope they figure out what to do with the guys and gals making $18/hour


The latest from america

Screengrab from a viral video showcasing a confrontation between a Native American drummer and a group of Catholic high school students in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 18, 2019. Screenshot via YouTube.
Several clips of the encounter circulating on social media show a small group of Native American drummers, who were in Washington for the Indigenous People’s March, being surrounded by a much larger band of teenagers.
Pope Francis has suppressed the Ecclesia Dei Commission, a significant decision with consequences for the Holy See’s relations with the priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X.
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 19, 2019
Photo: IMDB
A new Netflix miniseries brings out the story’s aspects of adventure and conflict, with occasionally pulse-pounding results.
Rob Weinert-KendtJanuary 19, 2019
Protestors march to support a U.N. anti-corruption commission in Guatemala City on Jan. 6. Photo by Jackie McVicar.
“What they are doing not only puts Guatemala at risk but the entire region. Bit by bit, for more than a year, they have been trying to divide us. The elections are at risk. We are six months away.”
Jackie McVicarJanuary 18, 2019