The Pope's Popularity in Latin America

Before the popes, both the Venerable Paul VI and the Blessed John Paul II, began to travel, it was possible to debate the pope’s popularity among the Latin American people. Distant, situated on another continent, object of insufficient catechesis that produced myths and religious prejudice, Catholics in Latin America did not seem to have strong ties to Rome. In the Americas, one could ask whether Peter’s successor was not simply an object of indifference.

The recent visit of Pope Francis to Rio de Janeiro to celebrate World Youth Day, where he was acclaimed by more than three million participants, offers a very different picture, one consistent with papal visits by Paul VI and Benedict XVI. Each one of the traveling popes had very different personalities, yet the people of Latin America have come out to welcome them with enthusiasm and admiration.

Advertisement

Paul VI’s trip to Colombia (1968), although quite brief, was the first papal visit to Latin America. The people put on their best clothes, filled the streets and the country stopped everything for four days. During John Paul II’s first trip to Mexico, the country came to a standstill, and the state-run TV had to cover every aspect of the visit. Possibly half of the people of Mexico saw and heard the pope directly. This required tiring walks on foot and, at times, all-night vigils. The papal trip from Mexico City to Puebla took three times as long as normal because the highway seemed to snake between two walls of human beings. Even in Monterrey, in the Northern desert, which is not a megalopolis, the pope gathered an estimated two million people.

The case of Mexico has been repeated with almost the same exact characteristics in each Latin American country the pope has visited. No other foreign visitor in history—no local politician since the day of independence, no sporting event, political concentration or national holiday of any kind—has achieved such power of convocation. Sociologists ask themselves why, just as do public relations experts and, above all, the political leaders in government. Even some theologians are perplexed. There have been cases (in Mexico, for instance) where political scientists and sociologists have called for a meeting with priests, in an effort to understand the phenomenon.

To attribute the pope’s popularity among the Latin American people to the Polish pope’s charisma is insufficient. With Paul VI the same thing occurred. There is little evidence for the argument that the people adhere to one pope over another, or that one pleases them more than another. Experience shows us that the Latin American people—everyday Christians—have little interest in evaluating their popes. That subject is left to the elite in Latin America, who also gather in the street to receive the current pope. It is a question of the pope’s popularity, simply because he is the pope.

How are we to respond to these perplexed sociologists and political scientists?

The answer is complex, involving several social and psychological factors, but the key factor is religious. The main cause of the experts’ perplexity is the forgotten fact of the power of the religious to convoke. Latin American people are more or less Christian, and all Christians are interested in meeting the pope, seeing such a meeting as something extraordinary, once in a lifetime, which they dare not miss. Add to this the characteristics of Latin American popular Catholicism, which is an expressive faith, happy to participate in community and multitudinous gatherings. It is a Catholicism of the tangible and the symbolic. And the pope is a living religious symbol of the first magnitude. A theologian would call it a symbol of the church’s unity, and of apostolic succession; the people see it in other terms. In their religious intuition, the pope is the “man of God,” God’s representative, a symbol of the religious and sacred. “To go see the pope” is sacramental; it is also in keeping with the itinerant tendency of their religious practice.

Other factors, of course, play a part. We should not dismiss the element of novelty and collective enthusiasm that is produced by the visits of Peter’s successors. But there are other, more profound, forces at work as well. The pope is a religious leader who speaks to the people not only of God, but also concerning their life and their human, social and even political problems. In the contemporary scene (especially in the Third World) where the public and political discourse has lost credibility, where demagoguery and popular manipulation are routine, and where corruption is notorious among the powerful, the presence and the word of the pope becomes a breath of fresh air that brings truth, authenticity and hope. It verifies the Gospel saying, “The sheep know their shepherd, and recognize his voice,” distinguishing the pope from false prophets and others who seek to take advantage of the flock.

In short, the multitudes that gather to see the pope (many of whom are poor, marginalized and oppressed) are indirectly protesting against their political and financial leaders, and are giving expression to a desire of liberty and dignity to which they aspire.

Do the people understand what the pope says? Not everything. But people are intuitive and understand with their heart. Their approach to the Holy Father is not so much a search for teaching as for religious inspiration and human freedom and, above all, a strong experience of God, the kind they cherish throughout their life, and which justifies the significant sacrifices involved.

Mario J. Paredes is the Roman Catholic liaison for the American Bible Society.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Bill Mazzella
5 years 2 months ago
How about "hero worship?" Francis is different in that he lives the gospel rather than "appear" to live it. Yet people's penchant for adoration is forever. The same who adored on Palm Sunday clamored for his crucifixion. Germany took to JFK because they long to escape their past wanted absolution. And so on. Popularity is ephemeral and passing. "Sic transit gloria mundi." Yet adoration goes on except when a true leader leads by example asks for sacrifices.
David Smith
5 years 2 months ago
Yes. Human beings respond enthusiastically and gratefully to something in religion far beyond theology.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018