Pope Benedict's headache: the Maciel millions, and the rot in Rome

The first of two parts of a new Jason Berry investigation into the way the Legionaries of Christ oiled the Roman Curia through money and gifts is posted at NCR. It makes for shocking reading.

The Pope emerges unscathed; indeed, is singled out for refusing an envelope of cash. And it was Benedict XVI, of course, who suspended Legion founder Maciel against the wishes of the cardinals he had over the years bought off -- chief among them Sodano and Martinex Somalo.

Advertisement

But it is Benedict XVI who now has the reports of the official Vatican investigation into the Legion which, if it contains even some of what Berry has discovered in the course of a journalistic investigation, is a live grenade in his hands.

It is the dovetailing of corruption and the cover-up of sex abuse which is most toxic. Maciel's millions, spread around the Curia in the style of mafiosi throughout the ages, were designed to deflect scrutiny from his life as a drug addict and paedophile. And for most of John Paul II's pontificate, it succeeded.

That's why this is bigger than just the future of the Legion. It is about the ease with which Maciel got away with it because of his powerful backers in Rome -- and the way that support could be bought. What Benedict XVI does with and in consequence of these revelations could well define the rest of his pontificate.

This is rot. And it goes deep.

Austen Ivereigh

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Robert Mickens
7 years 7 months ago
If ever there was a monster that should have been chucked out of the priesthood, it was Marcial Maciel.
Why did Cardinal Levada and Pope Benedict XVI merely ''invite'' him to a secluded life of prayer and penance on 19 May 2006 and not dismiss him from the clerical state?
While flying to the United States on 15 April 2008 the pope said: “We will absolutely exclude paedophiles from the sacred ministry; it is absolutely incompatible, and whoever is really guilty of being a paedophile cannot be a priest.” 
Sadly, Maciel remained one until the day he died and was buried in his priestly vestments.
Ginger Jones
7 years 7 months ago
Berry also has written a very interesting article on Levada's chequered history in handling the sex abuse crisis:
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/07/cardinal-levada-point-man-in-risky-vatican-strategy-against-the/
Carolyn Disco
7 years 7 months ago
Will the minor seminarians sexually abused by Maciel and ripped apart for decades by the Legion's PR machine get an invitation to the Vatican with full apology from Benedict?
 
They were completely excluded from mention in Benedict's decision to ''invite'' Maciel to a life of prayer and penance. Their painful decades-long struggle for justice never even got a verdict of guilty for Maciel out of the Vatican.
 
The actor who played Christ in Gibson's movie was invited by JPII, why not the victims JPII ignored?
 
See www.vowsofsilence.com for the full story. Jason Berry and Gerald Renner's work is the essential reason the Maciel case was reopened after being shut down by Ratzinger, under pressure from that paragon of financial integrity, Angelo Sodano. Yet Sodano gets a prime slot to spout off during Holy Week about attacks on Benedict.
 
Jason Berry is the dean of Catholic journalists who has been writing for 26 years against incredible odds to get out the truth. Come to think of it, Jason should be invited for a lengthy consultation with Benedict, along with the survivors, his close friends - if Benedict really wants to understand the rotten landscape in his own backyard. But how could he not know after being there since 1981?
 
 
Jim McCrea
7 years 7 months ago
Jason Berry:  Santo Subito!
Craig McKee
7 years 7 months ago
This is 54 year old rot!http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/31208?eng=yOne anxiously awaits the findings of Archbishop Chaput et al. as well as the decision ofBenedict XVI.http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1001126.htm
 
Carolyn Disco
7 years 7 months ago
Craig,
 
Re: http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/31208?eng=y
 
It is fascinating to see that 2005 piece by Sandro Magister in light of later revelations. I wonder if the seminarian who withdrew his accusation and the three who said they were in effect encouraged to lie would like to change their testimony. The pressure and fear of speaking out against Maciel, and the ways he could take revenge (and did) were no doubt severe, but how gratifying the truth has finally come out for those who did have the courage to come forward, no matter what.
 
The endnote about the Vatican putting out a press release saying there is no canonical case being pursued against Maciel was the dishonest, clever handiwork of Angelo Sodano. He who was on the receiving end of Maciel's generous gifts (ahem, bribes?) as follows per Jason Berry:
 
“Sodano came over with his entire family, 200 of them, for a big meal when he was named cardinal,” recalled Favreau. “And we fed them all. When he became secretary of state there was another celebration. He’d come over for special events, like the groundbreaking with a golden shovel for the House of Higher Studies. And a dinner after that.”
 
“Cardinal Sodano was the cheerleader for the Legion,” said one of the ex-Legionaries. “He’d come give a talk at Christmas and they’d give him $10,000.” Another priest recalled a $5,000 donation to Sodano.
 
What is left out is the $10,000 Maciel gave to a Cardinal Micara in post-war Italy, a huge sum at the time. Micara being the one who later ''reinstated'' Maciel during the interregnum between John 23 and Paul 6, but who had no authority to do so. The supposed document from the appropriate congregation has never surfaced.
 
Also, after the seminarians' accusations, the exonerating letter the Legion issued from the bishop who was part of that investigation is a forgery by all accounts. Maciel stopped at nothing.
 
Jim McCrea
7 years 7 months ago
Why people are shocked (shocked, I say:  shocked!!) that money talks at the Vatican is beyond me.
 
Who do you think gets easy access to your pastor' ear?  Your bishop's ear?
 
So why would/should the Vatican be any different - except the amounts are most likely higher than at the parish/diocesan level.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

“What we need to do is just continue to live out the challenge of ‘Laudato Si’,’ which is to examine our relationship with the earth, with God and with each other to see how we can become better stewards of this gift of the earth.”
Kevin ClarkeNovember 17, 2017
Hipsters love the authentic, the craft and the obscure—which is exactly why Catholicism, in its practices and its aesthetic, is perfectly suited for them.
Zac DavisNovember 17, 2017
In response to a query from America, Steve Bannon said, “The daily examen has become a tool for me to lead a better, more fulfilled life.”
James T. KeaneNovember 17, 2017

America asked readers through our email newsletter and social media platforms what they do for their loved ones who have died. Seventy-eight percent of readers described how they memorialize loved ones with photos and other objects.

Our readersNovember 17, 2017