Lambeth: the reckoning

The Archbishop of Canterbury’s press people will be smiling this morning: ‘How Williams kept his flock together’ is the Guardian’s headline; ‘Way ahead found in Church gay row’, is the BBC’s; while the London Times’s runs: ‘Bishops back Archbishop Rowan Williams’.

Hence the Daily Telegraph’s story: ‘Archbishop of Canterbury upbeat after Lambeth Conference’.


None of this could have been predicted three weeks ago, when all the talk as the Lambeth Conference opened was of a pointless and expensive (it cost $9m) exercise that was likely to leave the world’s Anglican bishops more divided than ever.

Press headlines have almost universally focussed on the divisions over homosexuality, so the media have also been pointing out that the bishops have not actually reached agreement on the issue. But that was never the purpose of the Lambeth Conference, which was to try to find ways of living with the differences while moving towards greater internal communion. In this aim, Dr Williams’s strategy of avoiding divisive resolutions and of getting the bishops to listen to each other and understand each other has been a triumph.

"Anglicans to seek pact to prevent schism" is how the New York Times neatly sums it up. The bishops have, in essence, backed  Dr Williams’s “Covenant” strategy, first laid out in the 2004 Windsor Report. In my America piece in the current issue,  I said that this report had been “largely ignored” at the time – which is true. So I was taken by surprise when Dr Williams suddenly – or so it seemed o me – revived it at this Conference and secured consensus from the bishops for implementing it.

The “Covenant” strategy means forging an agreed set of principles and beliefs, and backing these up with a tighter juridical framework. The implementation of these “instruments of communion” will be a lengthy process  -- a meeting of the Primates is scheduled for January, and there will be a series of further meetings next year – which probably won’t see fruit for many years. Dr Williams told reporters that he hoped Anglican leaders could agree on a draft covenant within a year, but said that winning approval for it among the 44 national and regional churches of the Anglican Communion could take until 2013. But a commitment to it is far more than could have been predicted a few weeks ago.

The question is whether this process will be enough to bring back into the fold the 280-odd Gafcon evangelical bishops from the developing world who boycotted the Conference in protest at Dr Williams’s failure to expel the North-American Anglicans (TEC). And, indeed, whether the TEC can consent to keeping in place the moratoria on consecrating actively gay bishops and blessings of same-sex couples—that is the price of the TEC remaining part of the Communion, and it may prove too high.

Gene Robinson, the Bishop of New Hampshire whose 2003 consecration sparked the row, does not like this one bit. “It’s a very odd thing for a Church that was founded as a resistance to any kind of centralised authority would now be trying to set up a centralised authority, that would decide what was right, what was orthodox, what was permissible”, he told the BBC’s Sunday programme. But Robinson does not speak for the TEC, and today he looks a lot less influential.

There are predictions that there will be, in effect, a two-tier Communion: one with those Churches that wish to be part of the new Covenant process led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, and those that do not. The eventual loss of the North-American Episcopalians and some of the developing-world evangelicals may turn out to be the price of a firmer, stronger, Anglican Communion, that agrees on the basics in order to get on with its mission.

Throughout these posts I have argued that at the heart of the crisis has been a very ancient Anglican tension between incompatible ecclesiologies – one essentially Protestant (whether conservative or liberal), the other more Catholic. The first leads to balkanisation whenever there are serious doctrinal differences. The second is the only serious way of remaining together.

The Archbishop of Canterbury has led his divided flock down a route marked ‘Catholic’, and not everyone will be able to follow him there. But most will. And that means embarking on a historical process that will lead the Anglican Church closer to Rome.

For Roman Catholics, perhaps the most exciting and satisfying result of this Lambeth Conference is to see just how much Rome has been a partner in this process, encouraging Dr Williams along this historically unprecedented route. Gene Robinson is right: it does seem a “very odd thing” for a Church which began by rejecting Catholic ecclesiology to end up, 450 years later, turning back to it.

Historians will no doubt see the transformations of the Second Vatican Council, and the intense Anglican-Catholic dialogue that resulted, as one of the prime reasons for this.  Others may say it is inevitable: as Cardinal Newman noted more than a hundred years ago of the ‘Via Media’, those who stand in the middle of the road tend to get run over. Others may point to Dr Williams, who exemplifies Keats’s "negative capability" -- a rare capacity to live in tension and uncertainty. Certainly, no one else in the Anglican hierarchy could have pulled this off: cometh the hour, cometh the man.  

But let’s not leave out the Holy Spirit, which has a consistently nice habit of running ahead where humans and their institutions recoil from treading.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
10 years 5 months ago
Thank you America and Ivan Ivereigh for the original article and this follow-up commentary. For one like myself who has not paid attention to any of these Anglican matters(outside of a few headlines) until this week, your articles appear to far outdo the news reports. One thing missing does seem to be almost any commentary on the question of women priests and how it enters into these discussions; the emphasis seems to be on the ''gay'' question. As I read Walter Kasper's address to the Lambeth Conference I saw the question of women priests as a major issue also. Again, Thank You!
10 years 5 months ago
Thank you Austen Ivereigh for the reference to your blog writings of 7/7/08 -7/10/08 in America. I read these and also some of the other blogs you made and find them most informative and interesting. To tell you the truth, I only got interested in the Anglican situation after reading your article in the America print edition which we receive. This led me to some news stories including in the various ''Catholic'' press and also the secular press which I ''googled''. I believe that from what you have written I see some of the complications and other aspects that make this whole subject pretty much beyond my being able to grasp; however, I thank you for helping me to realize this! Please excuse me for getting your first name wrong in my original post. Again, thank you for all your interesting writings and I hope to continue to follow your blogging.
10 years 5 months ago
John, thank you for your nice comments. On women priests, this was not an issue that came up at the Lambeth Conference because it does not divide the Anglican Communion as such, only the Church of England in a significant way -- because of the strongish presence of Anglo-Catholics, offspring of the nineteenth-century Oxford Movement. I blogged on the Church of England Synod which preceded the Lambeth Conference, in which the decision was made to proceed with the consecration of women bishops, and the possible consequences for Anglo-Catholic objectors to the move. If you click on my name above, you can find them by scrolling down. Between 7 and 10 July I posted: 'Whither the Anglo-Catholics?', 'Anglo-Catholics squeezed out', 'The long Anglican goodbye to Rome' and 'The real obstacle for Anglo-Catholics'.


The latest from america

The study found Latina immigrant women in Arizona who were pregnant during the contentious S.B. 1070 passage had babies with lower birthweight compared with those in prior years. Average birth weights did not decrease among U.S.-born white, black or Latina women during the same time.
J.D. Long-GarcíaJanuary 18, 2019
This week's guest is Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, founder of New Wave Feminists, a pro-life feminist organization dedicated to changing the divisive language surrounding the abortion debate.
Olga SeguraJanuary 18, 2019
Psychedelics can blur the line between science and spirituality—but Christian mysticism cannot be studied.
Terrance KleinJanuary 17, 2019