A Demand for Action: Protestors in NYC React to Eric Garner Verdict

On Dec. 3 a Staten Island grand jury decided not to indict New York City police officer, Daniel Pantaleo, in the death of Eric Garner on July 17. The decision arrives less than two weeks after a grand jury on Nov. 24 reached a similar decision in the case of Ferguson, Mo., police officer, Darren Wilson, who shot and killed 18-year-old Michael Brown on Aug. 9.

On Nov. 25, a day after the Ferguson decision, I marched along with my fellow New Yorkers. The march began on 17th and Broadway and made its way toward Times Square. Following the Dec. 3 grand jury decision in the Garner case, I once again took to the streets with protestors; this march began in Times Square and headed toward Rockefeller Center. While many of the protestors shouted many of the same chants heard during the Nov. 25 march (“NYPD! KKK!”; “Send all killer cops to jail!”; “Hands up! Don’t shoot!”), the vibe in the Garner protest was visibly different.

Advertisement

These individuals were not just protesting a death that occurred miles away in another state; they were chanting against a homicide that occurred in their own backyard, in one of New York City’s boroughs.

As I weaved my way through protestors and cops, I tried to comprehend how each side was feeling. I was unable to get answers from any of the police officers; they politely ignored me and continued marching alongside the protestors, determined to keep them safe despite the rage hurled their way.

When I asked protestors why they marched, one stated, “We march to let the world know being black is not a crime.” Another said the protests were necessary because it was the only way to stop these deaths, stating, “as long as we stand idly by, this will still happen. As long as we keep silent, this will still happen.”

A female protestor gave what was perhaps the most emotional reason for marching: “I don’t ever want to wake up and see my brother’s face on one of these posters.”

One thing was clear: protestors want more than just dialogue. They want action. They want to see changes to a system they see as deeply flawed, broken and prejudiced. Many of the protestors I met with admitted that while much anger was being rightly directed toward individual members of police forces, cops themselves were victims of a broken system. As one protestor eloquently stated, attacking one police officer will not be the solution because “It’s not one…singular cop, it’s the system!”

Olga Segura is an assistant editor at America.

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Chris NUNEZ
3 years 8 months ago
Good to see America covering these events, the times they reflect. It would also be illuminating to have somebody from America interview Professor Thomas R. Tyler who has researched the nature of 'encounters' between citizens and law enforcement over more than 30 years. His work (and the work of others in this area), is finally being explored and incorporated into the training and practices of police departments in different places throughout the nation. His book (1990) 'Why do people obey the law?' looks at the dynamics of trust and legitimacy of 'the law' and the society that creates 'the law' as they are established, or destroyed based upon the initial encounters between citizens and law enforcement officers (or any agent of government). As thoughtful citizens of this nation, we need to know what our options are, and what opportunities we have to change our badly broken system. Hope somebody interviews Professor Tyler and his cohorts soon.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Bishop Lawrence T. Persico of Erie, Pa., speaks during a meeting in late January at the headquarters of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
“I think we need complete transparency if we’re going to get the trust of the people back,” said Erie Bishop Lawrence T. Persico.
Mélanie Thierry as Marguerite Duras in “Memoir of War.” © Music Box Films
The film tells the story of a woman who worked for the German-controlled Vichy government but secretly joined the Resistance movement.
A. W. Richard Sipe (photo: Facebook)
Sipe's research into celibacy and priestly sexual behavior helped guide the work of church leaders and others responding to the clergy sexual abuse crisis.
Catholic News ServiceAugust 17, 2018
Did Pope Francis depart from Scripture and tradition in declaring the death penalty "inadmissible"? Or was his declaration rooted deeply in both?
Tobias WinrightAugust 17, 2018