The Art of the Tutored Physicality of Surprise: Lil Buck and Jookin (with an assist from Yo-Yo Ma)

In this weekend's New York Times, dance critic Alastair Macaulay introduces readers to jookin. If you are not familiar with this form of urban dancing/performance art, it is well worth checking out.

Macaulay's article is here. And here is jookin master Lil Buck with Yo-Yo Ma performing "The Swan":

Advertisement

 

And here is Lil Buck "versus" another remarkable jookin performer, G-Nerd (caveat: you will hear a typical selection of hip hop lyrics, some of which are going to be, or "should" be, off-putting or offensive to some listeners; the misogyny of hip-hop is well-documented and increasingly up for critical analysis in research about the genre; that said, don't let that take away from the dancing -- or watch with the volume down)... 

I am quite inadequate to the task of thinking theologically about dance -- or, for that matter, thinking danceishly about theology. But I am captivated by the cocktail of poise, strength, dexterity, improvisation, vulnerability, self-assertion, and sheer athleticism, as if jookin were the art of the tutored physicality of surprise -- notice the reactions evoked by the audience in both videos -- as a way into the fundamental possibilities of all bodily habitation.

This surprise through hips, toes, knees, elbows, and knuckles makes the body's own power the site of an event, of a "No way did that just happen!" The capacity for such events and the delight spectators take in them are theologically important. They point to a "more" to existence within existence.

How and why do they do so? Is it because they offer a way to unhinge the normally staid character of our everyday, undramatic movements, and to see those movements as variations on jookin? Is it because they offer an unattainable corporeal ideal that induces awe at the undiscovered potential of the human body?

Whether these or other paths of analysis are taken, jookin seems to open a path wherein the "more" that is always already "here," in calves, torsos, and the elegant potential of bodily wherewithals -- wherein this "more" is consented to, and where something heretofore unknown opens up, joyfully. The body, and by "extension" all our material world, is more gorgeously strange than we thought. And so comes the reaction: "No way did that just happen!" Or phrases even more colorful.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Beth Cioffoletti
5 years 11 months ago
... and the magic is that we can lose (or give) ourselves to this "more" and the totally unexpected happens and we are all taken up in it together ....  loved the videos.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018